Grade

Type of questions

English Senior High

英語です、 7⃣の答えは③です どうしてなのか読んでも読んでも分かりませんでした よろしくお願いします😥 ちなみに③の老婆についての文は 本文の9行目にあります

次の英文を読み。 あとの設問に For any Engiishman, there Can never est Shak at Wam 5 @- js he world's greatest pogP and gre8 人 nsell to hm igd9e. however 1 name can possibly (」) su999S Every Englishman he8 some KT oi us 059 words, 8 greateSt writer ys win95 that have @ neke9PP iah-sPeaKin9 people. ce of the Cc Spa「@. s siight of the work OPT _quotation8. from ry 9 mon prop9 re 9f 9 sourt nawal Ce Jiho 99 1aken to Se6 Der- paned Wel 6) as fulLo waに phrases and pecome part of the Com Most of the time We ae words we use, father like the 0 0 femance of Jaref and com kmown proves and duo Shakespeare, "TO「@ perhal use fthe great resources Of he any other writer, made full hn langUa96. Most of US use r normal employmert of Englishi twenty-five tnousandl (or an Englishman" (There js probablby no 57 reciate the richneSS and variety of the English 【andguaoe jn Shakespeare uSeS than by studying the various WayS4n whicl orlh the effort (t is not。of courSe, 6COm- Such a well W 20 mended 10 eginnerS), gen thoudh some aSDeCctS /Of English since 6 and the meaning 0f many words/ have changed SDeare'S 08y. 8 It is (5) paradoxical that 昌明 ニーーーーーー We Ti 央eo 4 know comparatively Ne ー 了 nglish 1 na auior / However/whet >iS not itS incident i al details し 9( | tan products, he 同SD , the plays andh, po IDM.MackenzeaL」 本 6 Ckground fo Brital

Resolved Answers: 1
English Senior High

長文どなたか教えてほしいです。 不安なんで…

ロ には 唱】 火のスピーチ放入を読んで、下紀の癌に和えなさい。 なおの人た家 本文の後に注があります。 As an old science reporter Tnd myselfin a diHfenlt position todai 0 Tighrtech executives on the topic of artifcial inteligence or AI Fnn surecoll 際。 far more about AI than 1 do. Stil. 1 think I can contribute some historical perspectHVe. Thave been writing science columns since many cf you were kids ( Z ) Hmrote my frst column on AT back in 1963。 Tm( イ ) because when T say *artifcial intelhgence"Tm talking about something that Tm not sure really exists. Those of you who have read my articlealand books on the subject know that Tbehieve in what we call imealk AT' and that 1 aminotieal onvineed by what we call srongALy oto Whats the difference? Lets say we program a computer to say Rhank youl in situations where real people would feel grateful. 1 think we could make eally sound like a thankful person。 Tm sure that such a machine and tuned so well that it could fool me were blindfolded But here's the question: Did the program actually feel thankf me? Or did the team who wrote the program thank me? Was According to the strong AL approach, the computer really couldibe ex According to weak AI, iCs just a machine making sounds。 Tim reminded of an old classic comedyy routine imagined a future world in which computers made 。 people really worried about that in the 1960s. In this ima handled every decision that humans didmt like making. One fmring other computers. So the comedy routine consists of a conm ose computer ecplaine to worker computer why itmust be fred The reason this comedy routine is interesting js not just bec because it expresses fears about strong AI。 ICs int 50 years ago- That's right。 a halfrcentury ago。 people uman decisions.They thoughtit might happ8mi the future.( ウ ).the predicted robotdominant、 Im my opinion, no matter how impressed none of us realiy believes that truly selfraware di exist. Tknow youre ll experts on AI but ileEs rogram, no matter how sophisticeted,( 王 ) marmyi jn or reject God. or say “Tlove you and mean it W cperatipg the machine-or who wrote the Dio As a real. thinking person who has obaerved tk research for many yearsu Tbelieve there will alaya bela efieve that no matter how sophisticated ATbeoon as a thinking person。T also know that 1 can be wi the future of science. Perhaps momeday those of yo

Unresolved Answers: 1
117/166