Grade

Type of questions

English Senior High

文脈について教えて頂けないでしょうか?🙇‍♂️🙇‍♂️🙇‍♂️ この文章のは3/14に出発すること予定していて、予定が一週間前倒しになりそうだと言っています。 しかし、同僚達は都合が悪いから行けないといっています。しかし3/7(前倒しした日)に再予約するといっているので... Read More

Questions 172-175 refer to the following online chat discussion. GO@②づ @⑨ Melyin Arocho (1:39 PM) > 后. Brenda and Vince. Brenda, have you made flight arrangementsfor us Yet7 @ Brenda Koster (1:40 PM) Yes.We Denmarkon 本[具訴0BIM. Any problems? @ Melvin Arocho (1:42 PM.) Em Yes、actually.(The meeting/with our Dinisf DaftGryhas been one weckto 酸琴 Wednesday. we just fidjout that wi RI its new laptppy WeWeaW And werllneed to the developmnent of our own new model. @ Vince Gayle (1:43 PIM. Realy?Tm camping/with my familyんiR人WSK @ Brenda Koster (1:44 PM.) lsig68Wpfor a three-day amateur tennis tournament. My first m地ch iDOn WWeGInesday計 @ Melvin Arocho (1:45 EMI.) 開 02 And 』 have ticketyfor a one-time-only perfoffhanceby (he BalletC6mpany that same day. IFS Gu6OPGME and 環RW Brnd、 rcbDOk ulor Mi訟 @ Brenda Koster (1:46 PM) sue.Ji there yr liehNivailable @ Brenda Koster (1:52 PM.) There'$ a flightAt 旧用人BIM * that time OKAwith both of you? @ IMelvin Arocho (1:54 PM) Sure. eidentally、 sajd she realizes onus. She will We gel coniPei ⑥@ Brenda Koster (1:SS PEM.) TharS very cOnSid6人ie ofher. ④ Brenda Koster (1:S9 PIM.) Thcre ame 蘭民four seats lcfon that flight-Vince so makeyOtKiindup fast @ Vince Gayle (2:01 PLML Sorry、I had to my desk. SUPPOSC- @⑤ Melyin Arocho (2: M Good. Brenda、 those arrangementS nOW- hat this lasLmimute chanae iS an imB6Sition cd s6WRTO 賠題172-175は次のオンラインチャットの話し合いに関するものです。 Melvin Arocho (午後1時39分) こんにちほは、BrendaとVince。Brenda、私たちの牧行機の手配はもうしましたか。 Brenda Koster (午後1時40分) はい。 私たちは環調補還午後2時20分にデンマークに向けて出発します。何か問題がありますか。 Melvin Arocho (午後1時42分) 実は、 あるんです。デンマークの提携先との会議が 1週間早まって、今度の水曜日になりました。Arownetic社が失年早々に新しいノー トバソコンを発売すると今しがた分かったためです。そして、それはつまり、当社はうちの新モデルの半発のスピードを上げなければな らないということです。 Vince Gayle (生後1時43分) 本当ですか。 私は来週、家族とキャンプに行くことになっているんです。 Brenda Koster (午後1時44分) 私は、3日間のアマチュアのテニストーナメントへの参加登録をしました。 私の最初の試合が水曜日にあるのです。 Melvin Arocho (午後1時45分) そして私は、その同日のブランデンブルク・ バレエ団による 1 回限りの公演のチケットを買ってあるんです。これは私たちにはどうにも できませんね、残念ですが。Brenda、私たちを名容天予約してください。 Brenda Koster (午後1時46分) 分かりました。 予約可能な便があるかどうか確認してみます。 Brenda Koster (生後1時52分) 午後 11時35分の便があります。その時間でお2人とも大丈夫ですか。 Melvin Arocho (午後1時54分) もちろん。 ちなみにMackさんは、この土壇場での変更が私たちに無理強いをすることを認鐘していると言っていました。 彼女は必ず私 たちが何らかの方法で埋め合わせしてもらえるようにするつもりです。 Brenda Koster (生後1時55分) 彼女の思いやりはありがたいですね。 Brenda Koster (生後1時59分) その便にはあと4府しか残っていません、Vince、ですから吉やかに決断してください。 Vince Gayle (午後2時01分) すみません、庶を外さなければならなかったんです。はい、大丈夫だと思います。 Melvin Arocho (午後2時02分) 良かった。Brenda、どうぞ、すぐにその手配をしてください。

Solved Answers: 1
English Senior High

長文どなたか教えてほしいです。 不安なんで…

ロ には 唱】 火のスピーチ放入を読んで、下紀の癌に和えなさい。 なおの人た家 本文の後に注があります。 As an old science reporter Tnd myselfin a diHfenlt position todai 0 Tighrtech executives on the topic of artifcial inteligence or AI Fnn surecoll 際。 far more about AI than 1 do. Stil. 1 think I can contribute some historical perspectHVe. Thave been writing science columns since many cf you were kids ( Z ) Hmrote my frst column on AT back in 1963。 Tm( イ ) because when T say *artifcial intelhgence"Tm talking about something that Tm not sure really exists. Those of you who have read my articlealand books on the subject know that Tbehieve in what we call imealk AT' and that 1 aminotieal onvineed by what we call srongALy oto Whats the difference? Lets say we program a computer to say Rhank youl in situations where real people would feel grateful. 1 think we could make eally sound like a thankful person。 Tm sure that such a machine and tuned so well that it could fool me were blindfolded But here's the question: Did the program actually feel thankf me? Or did the team who wrote the program thank me? Was According to the strong AL approach, the computer really couldibe ex According to weak AI, iCs just a machine making sounds。 Tim reminded of an old classic comedyy routine imagined a future world in which computers made 。 people really worried about that in the 1960s. In this ima handled every decision that humans didmt like making. One fmring other computers. So the comedy routine consists of a conm ose computer ecplaine to worker computer why itmust be fred The reason this comedy routine is interesting js not just bec because it expresses fears about strong AI。 ICs int 50 years ago- That's right。 a halfrcentury ago。 people uman decisions.They thoughtit might happ8mi the future.( ウ ).the predicted robotdominant、 Im my opinion, no matter how impressed none of us realiy believes that truly selfraware di exist. Tknow youre ll experts on AI but ileEs rogram, no matter how sophisticeted,( 王 ) marmyi jn or reject God. or say “Tlove you and mean it W cperatipg the machine-or who wrote the Dio As a real. thinking person who has obaerved tk research for many yearsu Tbelieve there will alaya bela efieve that no matter how sophisticated ATbeoon as a thinking person。T also know that 1 can be wi the future of science. Perhaps momeday those of yo

Waiting Answers: 1
Mathematics Senior High

岩手大のいつかの過去問です。黄色でマーカーを引いたところの文構造と和訳を教えてほしいです。believed to beやandの使われ方が特に分かりません。 どなたか解説よろしくお願いします。

Have you hcard he welLknown claim hat onl-7 pereent ofany spoken messageia還の3 1 sherieiel us that a fuN 93 pefeent ef any message is communicared nonverbally/Tiis contcndon is 6f cours absGNute Rubbisi Thc 7-pcrccnt formula is endorscd by many professional communicaton traincrs They cell us that of hc 93 pcrcent figure refering to nonverbal Gommunicaton 53 pcrcenr is through body language and the Other 38 percent is through One GTNOice T anndcd acommunicatons workshop recendy in 《siicdh the faeiitorl uite 9 cy mphasizcd ythese seadsdcs/ wasy to put it indelicatey dumbfounded9 Tchallenged her by asking "Do you mcan that if stood jn front ofithis class and spoke yere consistent with my rp in Chinse,&s jong aymy body language and tone of rmessagey You would al understand me?9 She uecd all he communicadon Kils at her command to virtually slap me down. /She supported hcr claims by quoting the research done by the eminent psychology professor Albert Mehrabian。 The rest_of the class impresscd that this principle was being put fortn as the の7 resulr of a scientific study and not just as a myth or rumor。 nodded in agreement 1 acquiesced*。 remaining unconvinccd. 1 consulred my friend Google and did some research。 Yes。experiments were の7 conducted by Albert Mehrabian、 currcntly profcssor emeritus* of psychology at the Universiny of California at Los Angcles. But thc rcscarch in qucstion was done in 3 1967.using one word at a ime to measure [yhat thc hstcncr beliced to be the fcchng of he spcakerkndl determine iF the Istener hiked the spcaker The cxperiment was never intended to measurelhow well the jkteners understood what the spcaker was nying Q communicate. Achrabian has published his work and findimgs in thc book Sicr AMesge。(On gz his website、 Mchrabian states: “SAgr Afessgges contains a detailed discussion of my indings on inconsistent messages QP feelings and atiitudes (and the relatve importance Tam ob beginning Unformnaele 39

Waiting for Answers Answers: 0