なぜ、受け身の進行形はis been ingではなくis being p.pなのでしょうか、変な質問ですみません。

You have to handle fragile glassware with care. これって何文型ですか？

英検2級英作文 添削お願い致します🙇‍♀️

* I think so. I have two reasons. First, smoking damaged not only smoker, but also many people. If cities do this, people can be healthy and fine. It is amazing. Second, it makes safety cities. By doing so, a lot of people come and live this city. City will be famous and good. It helps city's development. Therefore, I believe that all of cities in the world have banned Smorking sidewalks and help people's health and city's improvement. on 59

答えは1番なのですが3のsupposeを入れたら文法的におかしいですか？教えて頂きたいです。よろしくお願いいたします。

5/m 9. () he listened to his mother, he might not have made such a mistake. Had D ②2 Should ③ 3 Supposed borro①If og ved >

16行目のItが何を指しているのか分からないので教えて頂きたいです。よろしくお願いいたします。

10 A certain number of people are always upset by hearing such stories. Soon after this meeting, I got a pleasant but agitated letter from an intelligent and highly trained psychologist who had heard my talk. How, she demanded, could children possibly learn unless we corrected all their mistakes? Wasn't that our responsibility, our duty? I wrote a long reply, repeating my point and telling 15 still more stories about children correcting their own mistakes. But she seems to be as far from understanding me as ever. It is almost as if she cannot hear what I am saying. This is natural enough. Anyone who makes it his life (3) work to help other people may come to believe that they cannot get along without him, and may not want to hear evidence that they can, all too often, 20 stand on their own feet. Many people seem to have built their lives around the notion that they are in some way indispensable to children, and to question (4) this is to attack the very center of their being. Still, even at the risk of

3行目から4行目にかけてorが並列されているのですが並列は,で区切って最後だけorではないのでしょうか？教えて頂きたいです。よろしくお願いいたします。

An instance of the nominal fallacy is most easily seen when the meaning or importance of a term or concept shrinks with knowledge. One example of this would 定 153 be the word "instinct." "Instinct" refers to a set of behaviors whose actual cause we Bot s Simbly. Th don't know, or simply don't understand or have access to, and therefore we call them 本能的 先天性 生得的 ・遺伝 15 instinctual, inborn, innate. Often this is ( 2 ). They are the "nature" part of the 3(442-3) 中の nature-nurture argument (a term itself likely a product of the nominal fallacy) and therefore can't be broken down or reduced any further. But experience has shown that this is rarely the truth. 潜在仮定

この文章の文構造が分からないので教えて頂きたいです。dischargedの前はthat節が省略されているのでしょうか...？

We have known incurable cases discharged from one hospital], [to which the deaths ought to 0 S V Ant ② have been accounted, and then admitted into another hospital], (to die there in a day or two 結果のto 不定詞「その結果」 自分と相良い after admission), (thereby lowering the mortality rate of the first at the expense of the second). 大金) 分詞構文 和訳: 私たちは、治療不能とされた患者がある病院から退院させられ、 死亡は本来その病院で報告されるべきであった にもかかわらず、 別の病院に入院し、入院から1日か2日で死亡するという事例を知っている。 その結果、最初の病院 の死亡率は下がり、 第二の病院の死亡率がその分上がることになる。 share (with x)ole focus •Love O with X まる!!

答えは2のshould comeなのですが1のwould comeが不可な理由が分からないので教えて頂きたいです。 よろしくお願いいたします。

5/1 A. If my mother ( while I am out, please tell her to wait. ① would come (3) ought to come 仮定法では 使用しない!! ② should come (4) will come

When we arrive at New Chitose Airport, it ( ) there. snowを使って答える問題で、was snow と書いたのですが、答えがwill be snowing でした。どこから未来形の文だと読み取れるか教えてください。

4番（赤マル）の問題の並べかえ合ってますか？

7 文法 ( )内の語句を並べかえて、 英文を完成させよう。 1. (has the train / arrived / not) yet. The train has not arrived 2. I (four/to/been/ have / Osaka) times. I have see] yet. 5. panda dvoM →教科書 p. 61 63,65 1. yet 「まだ ( いない)」 2. 「~へ行っ been to Osaka four とがある」 times. 3. dish [m] 3. I (the / washed / already / have) dishes. I have already washed the 4. Ken (become / wanted/ always / has / to) a pilot. dishes. Ken has always wanted become to a pi 5. He Lan a pilot. 4. pilot 「パイロン