Grade

Type of questions

Science Junior High

(4)が分からないんですが、 そもそもこの問題では、茎からも蒸散するのでしょうか? 茎の中に空気が入らないように水中で枝を切り、、、や 枝に水や水蒸気を通さないワセリンを用いて、と書いてあってよく分かりません。 また、何も塗らないが14なのに、何故QとRを足した数にならない... Read More

96 5 [蒸散〕 次の実験について, あとの問いに答えなさい。 [実験] 同じアジサイの株から, 葉 の枚数が同じで、葉の大きさ, 茎の太さが同じような枝を3 本選び, 茎の中に空気が入ら ないように水中で茎を切り, 枝の長さをそろえた。 右の図 -油 14- 2 水 P14 Q7 おーうー why? Ra のように水が入ったメスシリンダーP,Q,Rにそれぞれ枝を入れ, 水面を油でおおい, それぞれの枝に水や水蒸気を通さないワセリンを用 いて、下の表のような処理をした。 次に, 3本の枝を光が当たる場所に 並べて置き, メスシリンダーの目盛りを読んで, 4時間後の水の減少量 を表にまとめた。 おふ メスシリンダー アジサイの枝に行った処理 何もぬらない。 水の減少量 [cm] 14 +2 2 =8 Q R すべての葉の表側にワセリンをぬる。 すべての葉の裏側にワセリンをぬる。 おめ 12 □ (1) 実験で,下線部の操作を行ったのはなぜか。 6212 □(2) 葉の表皮に見られる, 三日月形の細胞にはさまれたすき間を何というか。 □(3)表で,メスシリンダーPとQの水の減少量の差はどこからの蒸散の量を示 しているか。 □ (4) 実験で,すべての葉の裏側からの蒸散の量は,すべての葉の表側からの蒸 散の量の何倍になるか。 (1)水量 (2) (9)

Resolved Answers: 1
English Senior High

問4の⑤の計算はどうすれば合うのですか。 教えてください🙇‍♀️ 3枚目が答えです。

次の英文を読んで,下の設問に答えなさい。 Last year, 4.2 million babies died. That is the most recent number reported by UNICEF of deaths before the age of one, worldwide. We often see lonely and emotionally charged numbers like this in the news or in the materials of activist groups or organizations. They produce a reaction. Who can even imagine 4.2 million dead babies? It is so terrible, and even worse when we know that almost all died from easily preventable diseases. And how can anyone argue that 4.2 million is anything other than a huge number? You might think that nobody would even try to argue (that, but you would be wrong. That is exactly why I mentioned this number. Because it is not huge: it is beautifully small. If we even start to think about how tragic each of these deaths is for the parents who had waited for their newborn to smile, and walk, and play, and instead had to bury their baby, then this number could keep us crying for a long time. But who would be helped by these tears? Instead let's think clearly about human suffering. The number 4.2 million is for 2016. The year before, the number was 4.4 million. The year before that, it was 4.5 million. Back in 1950, it was 14.4 million. That's almost 10 million more dead babies per year, compared with today. Suddenly this terrible number starts to look smaller. In fact (2)the number has never been lower. Of course, I am the first person to wish the number was even lower and falling even faster. But to know how to act, and how to prioritize resources, nothing can be more important than doing the cool-headed math and realizing what works and what doesn't. And this is clear: more and more deaths are being prevented. comparing the numbers. (3). We would never realize that without

Resolved Answers: 1