赤線部についてwhat toが「どう〜か」という訳になっているのはなぜですか？🙇🏻‍♀️

40 テレビの子供への影響 179 words 1 Many people are concerned about what television has done to the generation of American children who have grown up watching it. For one thing, TV deprives children of creative imagination Some teachers feel that television has taken away the child's 5 ability to form mental pictures in his own mind, resulting in children who cannot figure out a simple story without visual illustrations. For another, too much TV too early tends to cause children to turn away from real life. As a result, they grow up to be passive spectators who can only respond to action, but not take 10 the initiative in doing anything. 2 Another area for concern is that children are short of tolerance for learning. They don't know what to do with some problems if it takes them too long to solve them, because they have been conditioned to see all problems solved in 30 or 60 minutes on TV 15 3 Television violence in particular has the most serious impact on children, most of whom get used to it and become incapable of 17 sympathizing with the pains of others. Tegala Jasd edited

赤線のitというのは何を指しているのでしょうか🙇🏻‍♀️

200 words When a human infant comes into being in any community in any part of the world, it has two things in common with any other infant. First of all, newborn children are completely helpless Apart from a powerful capacity to draw attention to their 5 helplessness by using sound, there is nothing the newborn child can do to ensure his own survival, Without care from some other human being, be it mother or father, an infant is not liable to survive 2 This helplessness is characteristic of a human infant, and is in contrast with the capacity of many newborn animals to stand up 10 within minutes of birth. They don't even have difficulty running with the *herd within a few hours. Since young animals are certainly in danger, sometimes for weeks or even months after birth, compared with the human infant, they quickly develop the capacity to protect themselves. However, the human infant is in need of others for a is 15 very long time. During this long period, the human infant develops the second feature which it shares with all other human infants, the capacity to learn language. It goes without saying that language 18 specific to and indispensable to the *human race. (注) herd 「(同種の動物の) 群れ」 human race [ is

外国の方に電車で「私の席をゆずるよ」ってなんて言うの？ Shall I give give you my seat? May I give you my seat? etc. 助動詞のニュアンス分かんない😭

この黄色のマーカーが引いてある部分ですがto be retained betterは不定詞の副詞的用法でallowsにかかっているという認識であっていますか？

tends to happen (during the first half of the night, our brains exhibit 66 3. slow waves." 4. These waves help organize new memories, and scientists believe that this allows newly learned information to be retained better) 4. It's been shown that participants who do not 英文解釈 get enough sleep experience less deep sleep than normal sleepers, and find, it harder to 5 23

（2）の解き方を教えてほしいです。グラフの変化の仕方が分かりません。

26 6 酸とアルカリの反応 体積の比が1:1でちょうど中和する塩酸 Aと水酸化ナトリウム水溶液Bがある。 図の ような回路をつくり、 ステンレス電極と塩酸 A 50cm を入れ、 5V の電圧を加えたところ、 水溶液に電流が流れた。 これに、 水酸化ナト リウム水溶液Bを5cmずつ100cmまで 加えてよくかき混ぜ、 そのたびに電流が流れ 6 本誌 > P.2、10~11 (1 豆電球、 電源装置、 ステン DE 水溶液中のイオンの総数 個 2 5n 4n 3n 2n 塩 酸 ーレス n 電極 A 電流計 [個] るかどうかを調べたところ、 全ての場合で電流が流れた。 (1) 水素イオンと水酸化物イオンが結びついてできる物質は何か、 化 学式で書きなさい。 (2) 水酸化ナトリウム水溶液Bを加えていったとき、 水溶液中のイオ ンの総数はどのように変化したか。 最初に塩酸A50cmの中にあ った水素イオンの数をn個として、解答欄のグラフに表しなさい。 3 水酸化ナトリウム水溶液Bを50cm加えたとき、 水溶液は中性 になっている。このとき、水溶液に電流が流れた理由を、 水溶液中 に存在するイオンの名称を示して書きなさい。 25 50 75 100 水酸化ナトリウム水溶液Bの体積 [cm] 長野改

この文章についてなのですが二行目の元の文の形が分からなくてS pack us closely ならthe closely we are packedとなるのではないかと思ってしまいました。 それと、resentful ofのofは何にかかっているのでしょうか？each ot... Read More

eg. He attempted to cover up all the traces of his できている ~ようになる ある程度は いの Those of us who live in towns have learned to adjust ourselves to some degree to the kind of overcrowding 当然 which seems to be an inevitable consequence of city life; but, the closer we are packed, the more easily ・この単自体に resentful of éach other do we tend to become. 〈構造分析図〉下線部(1) 【対応構文】 254/6/211 "必然的 意味あいがある。 [the +&]+[the+):とうちの that those の形と同じ the kind of which より空には中身が分からない S pack us closely 【the closely we are packed 仲 なるほど which (どんな)を 待っている。

英検2級の要約とライティングの添削をお願いしたいです🙇‍♀️すごく字が読みにくいと思うんですが よろしくお願いします💦

以下の英文を読んで,その内容を英語で要約し、解答欄に記入しなさい。 ●語数の目安は45語~55語です。 解答は,解答用紙のB面にある英文要約解答欄に書きなさい。なお, 解答欄の外 に書かれたものは採点されません。 解答が英文の要約になっていないと判断された場合は, 0点と採点されることが あります。 英文をよく読んでから答えてください。 University students often plan for their future careers by attending job fairs or searching online for information about different kinds of work opportunities. There are other ways, too. Some of them choose to join short-term work programs at companies called internships. These have some good points. Students will be able to know more about companies they are interested in, such as what kind of jobs there are and what kind of people are working there. Also, internships allow students to get to know other students. These students can encourage each other both during and after the internship. On the other hand, if students choose to join very short internships, they may not be able to understand the job they are doing before the internships end. Also, students who take part in internships may find it difficult to do well in their studies. University students have their future careers. They many things about things about companies and are interested a enable students to find chances to join interships for know other students who in those too. However, they can not understand the job and they confuse their way to study if they join internships only a few days.

この文を英語にするとどう訳せますか？教えて下さい🙇‍♂️

間違うことは必ずしも悪いことではない。人は経験から多くのことを学 ぶからだ。 大事なのは同じ間違いを繰り返さないように努力することで ある。 [青山学院大 ] [状況例 ある会社の社長が, 入社式で新入社員に向かって話している。

解説お願いします。 自由英作文の採点で減点部分がなぜ間違いなのか教えてほしいです。 よろしくお願いします。

(A) デジタル化やAIの進展に伴い, 未来の教育はどのように変わるべきか。 あなたの考えを,理由を添えて, 60~80語の英語で述べよ。

以前画像3枚目の様に修飾限定予告のthatというものを習ったので今回もその形なのかと思い、それらのと入れずに訳してしまったのですがこのthoseの識別は文脈判断ということでしょうか？ 教えて頂きたいです。よろしくお願いいたします。

実理 K The starting point for today's *meritocracy, of course, is the idea that intelligence exists and can be measured, like weight or strength or fluency in French. The most obvious difference between intelligence and these other traits is that all the others are presumably changeable. If someone weighs too much, he can go on a その人 →Heyで受けるのが一般的 5 diet; if he's weak, he can lift weights; if he wants to learn French, he can take a course. But in principle he can't change his intelligence. There is another important difference 原則として MV between intelligence and other traits. Height and weight and speed and strength and サフィス体例 関係性が強い文がくる even conversational fluency are real things; there's no doubt about what's being 間違いなん measured. Intelligence is a much murkier concept. Some people are generally (2) m2 Vogue 10 smarter than others, and some are obviously talented in specific ways; they're chess 天才 S masters, math *prodigies. But can the factors that make one person seem quicker than another be measured precisely, like height and weight? Can we confidently say that one person is 10 percent smarter than another, in the same way we can say he's 10 へんて、いつだっ S percent faster in the hundred-yard dash? And can we be confident that two thirds of 櫂へん 言いかえ 15 all people have IQs within one standard deviation of the norm that is, between 90 ように and 110 - - as we can be sure that two thirds of all people have heights within one standard deviation of the norm for height? Yes, they can, and yes, we can. besure least, are the answers that the IQ part of the meritocracy rests on. Those, at (3)-