sunshine3 program8-2　Q1.2 program8-3 Q1.2 答えがわかる方教えてください

8科学省検定済圭科講 中学校外還語科用 |開陳堂| SUNSHINE ENGLISH COUR SE 3 人AA_ っ<、 へ4 S、 がCRグ4やZZみゆ

何番になりますか？お願いします！

英 語 (2 一12) (寺生 | | - | ) 第1間 炎の英壇を読み あとの問い (問1 12) に答えなさい。なお[1] 一 16 は段落を示しています。 *印の語 (名) には注がついています。 (解答番号 は1一 12 |) UMの ontribute to the *diversity ) js lost when ]anguages (and cultures) then becomes important to understand what can and is bei protect fhe world's anguages. Yet, 中」 once we have recognized how languages CI of our world and (| disappear mg done to ges, this simply is not Bossible. There are too many ]anguages with too few speakers and n ot enough time. Understanding this, there are generally two active approaches to Yendangered janguages. The 近rst js gz2ge peser7o7 and the second is gge 7e/7277zZ7O7。 [2] Language preservation often occurs when the ]anguage has bee reduced to Yery few jving speakers. Im this type of Work linguists to record as much information about the language and culture as i Dossible knowing that once these Temaining Speakers are gone th (5) Ianguage js dead. (| this kind of work jnguistic "salvage work 8 49m second it is sometimes calle

答えがないので1から4まででどれがあっているか教えて欲しいです。 ⚠私はあっていないと思います。

英 語 (2 一12) (角答番号 | 1 | - | se | ) 第 1 間。 次の共丈を読み。あとの思い (問1 12) に答えなきい。 なお,【[1】 一 [6 は自落を示しています。*印の語 (名) には注がついていますc (半生 AMWりの 仙回上層| 還記 ibute to the *diversity 中 」 Once we have recognized_how W languages contri of our world and ( 日 ) is lost when languages (and cultures) diSappear i then becomes important to understand what can and jS being done to protect the world's languages. Yet。 no matter how much we might want (3) to ビー all of the world's languages, this simply jS not possible. There d not enough tme. are too many languages with too few Speakers an active approaches to Understanding this, there are generally two endangered Ianguages。 The frst is Zngigge preservgfion and the second is /27g42ge 『7ey7Z77<77O77。 [2] Language preservation often occurs when the language has been reduced to Very few living speakers. In this type of work, “lmguists try itO record as much information about the language and culture as ijS

長文どなたか教えてほしいです。 不安なんで…

ロ には 唱】 火のスピーチ放入を読んで、下紀の癌に和えなさい。 なおの人た家 本文の後に注があります。 As an old science reporter Tnd myselfin a diHfenlt position todai 0 Tighrtech executives on the topic of artifcial inteligence or AI Fnn surecoll 際。 far more about AI than 1 do. Stil. 1 think I can contribute some historical perspectHVe. Thave been writing science columns since many cf you were kids ( Z ) Hmrote my frst column on AT back in 1963。 Tm( イ ) because when T say *artifcial intelhgence"Tm talking about something that Tm not sure really exists. Those of you who have read my articlealand books on the subject know that Tbehieve in what we call imealk AT' and that 1 aminotieal onvineed by what we call srongALy oto Whats the difference? Lets say we program a computer to say Rhank youl in situations where real people would feel grateful. 1 think we could make eally sound like a thankful person。 Tm sure that such a machine and tuned so well that it could fool me were blindfolded But here's the question: Did the program actually feel thankf me? Or did the team who wrote the program thank me? Was According to the strong AL approach, the computer really couldibe ex According to weak AI, iCs just a machine making sounds。 Tim reminded of an old classic comedyy routine imagined a future world in which computers made 。 people really worried about that in the 1960s. In this ima handled every decision that humans didmt like making. One fmring other computers. So the comedy routine consists of a conm ose computer ecplaine to worker computer why itmust be fred The reason this comedy routine is interesting js not just bec because it expresses fears about strong AI。 ICs int 50 years ago- That's right。 a halfrcentury ago。 people uman decisions.They thoughtit might happ8mi the future.( ウ ).the predicted robotdominant、 Im my opinion, no matter how impressed none of us realiy believes that truly selfraware di exist. Tknow youre ll experts on AI but ileEs rogram, no matter how sophisticeted,( 王 ) marmyi jn or reject God. or say “Tlove you and mean it W cperatipg the machine-or who wrote the Dio As a real. thinking person who has obaerved tk research for many yearsu Tbelieve there will alaya bela efieve that no matter how sophisticated ATbeoon as a thinking person。T also know that 1 can be wi the future of science. Perhaps momeday those of yo

答えをお願い致します

に硬えなまい 6還koを2人 -問5)に衝 ey eeisne nliy p amnel yidion. td Laward the tamk sitting in ir addenton iagaond them end direct ll bei jmore werything 1 are far mre jieated han thet m ie eim end tenton menngemen we manage diferent yPeS rattention throgD amake and nt er ad iferent challenges atart by discussing dy These dierent ama( A )mot hout cm 1 eeeeitege wed mpoa pene tuieeme deer ee ee 記和romehine Pr mmpto ppoee yo aminiBDmr emiy is wething teloyiion.You may etrugmie 語 uhere cmsduay ue mr enoee rand yeu fn order syomrbook ae amtary demonr Yo nm chatdeemr La Neon ie aneede Untrtumatetyie amusele that has beome| HURE meet rua to uee The geed newe is thet Yoluntary attention can be menea dou appheetion. ikesny msdlaitgrows( B )withewerserThat syou can evereome *dietractions and develop the ability to concentrete on mand seiongasyore wilipgteputin thework mg aentien im the opposte ofvelamtery attenton、You heve no contrl gnah5E il db 365 tteotisBiegrdle語Ph foouae you aro. Ao e Pairrme ikmrowtutonoms ie wine nm ary attention ia what you use to mre reading s book in the to concentrate ii Yudedde what catehes your notice an Inyolentary attention has great valoe when our safety ia at risk。 Imagine our amcestors hunting for food.They wouldve been at risk of attacks fom wild animals as ell ss fom members of neighboring, ageressive tri Fngy aggressive tribes Involantary attention kept ]hem alert。and thus kept them sate (most ofthe time)、 Cre kidom in stuatione today that threaten our ives We hive in rlative satet 0 和relative safety We go about our days uncpneerned that our ine aa neerne r iives mi peatii に ight be put at risk at any g The problem is cnr imveluntary aueenton, an i mr aiTention, an important part of onr genetic ii二

答えをお願いします！！

て道切な油(全) をそれぞれ 第2問 次の共六(昌一15) において 空所に入れるの ①-④の中かーっずつ選びなさい aladrpepetowe neeeeed in rarey人enay eteer 本1 Rood bloee( smaneanngーコ ン (eee 、 od Smemee @ wmpyy 角2 Rm and hishrotherlookxactiyike( 。 )uatTimissiuuetaer [アゴ aesimst @ petr (⑨jeew itho の 4の" 2C 過3 Thecountyhasbeenina peor( eee wereコ ① artiGeial @ Meonomie ③ effective @ brosd 用 山4 When she was sked to write her( 。 ).she wrote TsoRoware programmei em 9 signature )sletin ashorttime_ ③ grazed Fe @ pronuneiation @⑥ mechaniam 瑞5 Sheworked very hard and( @ annoyed achieved の 秦4 間6 Theengineering instrd tomyorkr kar )omwoimpove herakil RYO ノブ 1 本 ③ respective @e の@ ee eta IOE の we (⑨mm 同7 Please sendyour到 r( )thecntents. [2] Outmel |のotrminglO Certm 。 ③youwileonRrm difierent Mtpdards、 9] ぐ msimht

こういう問題があった場合は、どう対策とって勉強したらいいですか？？

第2問 oxoa所 入れるのに最も適当なものを, それ ぞれ下の⑩⑥の中から一っずっ人選びなさい。 ただし, 同じものを繰り返し用いな いものとする。 なお. 空所の番号は。 解答欄の解答番号と一致させてある。 (*印の 語句については,注釈を参照すること。) Bhutans mana sa Rh (Donekhe0, one cf58 langnages (jn the Tbetan langnage family) Tn the acooE Enghsh ja the GE (Oinetraedion and Dongkha teught as the saena PT @ Unsi the 1980s, the sponsored the teaching of Nepai in schools in onthern Bhutan。 With the adoption cf Daglam Namzhag and its expaneion⑨ Tnto fhe iea of strengthening the role oFDzongkha, Nepahi was dropped fom Before the 1980s, the Lhotshampa (Nepahi-speaking commun6y mainly based 近 southern Bhutan。 constitoted approximately 309% of population. However, afRier conducting the "parge of Lhotshampas from 1990E 1992 this number might not accwtately efect the eumrent 加@加 Dzongkha is parially inteligible with "Sikkimese and spoken natively bm 259%6 of the population. Tshangla, the | 19 of*the Sharchop and 福 principal pre-Tibetan Janguage of Bhutan is spoken by a greater numb記護 people. Nepali speakers constituted some 402oE the nopulaton as of 2608 The larger minority 1anguages are Dzala (1196) imbn (10%) Rheng (8%) Rai (8%). There are no reliable sources fom the ethnie om ingustc | 20 ot Bhutan, so these numbers do not add up to 1009| 注駅 : Driglam Namzhag「プブータンの伝統的礼法服装規定など5含まれる purge「追放」 Sikiimese「シッキム人(プータンとネバペーの間にあるイドのシラキム州の住民)」 the Sharchop 「プータン東部の住民』 @ carrieulam @ goernment @ mediam @ pomalaton 《⑩ composition @ jangusge

上の文と下の文は同じ意味ですか？

[使用する語句] season,、best lvho+ d。 P 民話届 さだ 1 Seasen du yeuukke +he_ best PR0GRAM 10のまとめ 15、

岩手大のいつかの過去問です。黄色でマーカーを引いたところの文構造と和訳を教えてほしいです。believed to beやandの使われ方が特に分かりません。 どなたか解説よろしくお願いします。

Have you hcard he welLknown claim hat onl-7 pereent ofany spoken messageia還の3 1 sherieiel us that a fuN 93 pefeent ef any message is communicared nonverbally/Tiis contcndon is 6f cours absGNute Rubbisi Thc 7-pcrccnt formula is endorscd by many professional communicaton traincrs They cell us that of hc 93 pcrcent figure refering to nonverbal Gommunicaton 53 pcrcenr is through body language and the Other 38 percent is through One GTNOice T anndcd acommunicatons workshop recendy in 《siicdh the faeiitorl uite 9 cy mphasizcd ythese seadsdcs/ wasy to put it indelicatey dumbfounded9 Tchallenged her by asking "Do you mcan that if stood jn front ofithis class and spoke yere consistent with my rp in Chinse,&s jong aymy body language and tone of rmessagey You would al understand me?9 She uecd all he communicadon Kils at her command to virtually slap me down. /She supported hcr claims by quoting the research done by the eminent psychology professor Albert Mehrabian。 The rest_of the class impresscd that this principle was being put fortn as the の7 resulr of a scientific study and not just as a myth or rumor。 nodded in agreement 1 acquiesced*。 remaining unconvinccd. 1 consulred my friend Google and did some research。 Yes。experiments were の7 conducted by Albert Mehrabian、 currcntly profcssor emeritus* of psychology at the Universiny of California at Los Angcles. But thc rcscarch in qucstion was done in 3 1967.using one word at a ime to measure [yhat thc hstcncr beliced to be the fcchng of he spcakerkndl determine iF the Istener hiked the spcaker The cxperiment was never intended to measurelhow well the jkteners understood what the spcaker was nying Q communicate. Achrabian has published his work and findimgs in thc book Sicr AMesge。(On gz his website、 Mchrabian states: “SAgr Afessgges contains a detailed discussion of my indings on inconsistent messages QP feelings and atiitudes (and the relatve importance Tam ob beginning Unformnaele 39

なぜ３番なのか、教えてください

び, 番号を解答欄に記せ。 (G) Satoru( ) in New York for ive yearg when the War 基Fe out. ① tives 、@ haslived (⑨ had ved 、④ has been ving