Grade

Type of questions

English Senior High

全文訳お願いします!

4 20 科学 420 words Chapter 1 The recipe for making any creature is written in its DNA. So last year, when 1-1 geneticists* published the near-complete DNA sequence of the long-extinct woolly mammoth, there was much speculation about whether we could bring this giant creature back to life. 5 東京理科大学 Creating a living, breathing creature from a genome* sequence that exists only in a computer's memory is not possible right now. But someone someday is sure to try it, predicts Stephan Schuster, a molecular biologist at Pennsylvania State University and a driving force behind the mammoth genome project. So besides the mammoth, what other extinct beasts might we bring back to life? Well, 12 10 it is only going to be possible with creatures for which we can recover a complete genome Without one, there is no chance. And usually when a creature dies, the (1) - DNA in any flesh left untouched is soon destroyed as it is attacked by sunshine and bacteria. sequence. There are, however, some circumstances in which DNA can be preserved. If your 15 specimen froze to death in an icy wasteland such as Siberia, or died in a dark cave or a really dry region, for instance, then the probability of finding some intact stretches of DNA is much higher. Even in ideal conditions, though, no genetic information is likely to survive more than a million years. - so dinosaurs are out and only much younger remains are likely to yield good-quality DNA. "It's really only worth studying specimens that are less than 100,000 years old," says Schuster. The genomes of several extinct species besides the mammoth are already being sequenced, but turning these into living creatures will not be easy. "It's hard to say that something will never ever be possible," says Svante Pääbo of the Max Planck Institute 25 for Evolutionary Anthropology in Germany, "but it would require technologies so far removed from what we currently have that I cannot imagine how it would be done." But then (3) 50 years ago, who would have believed we would now be able to read the instructions for making humans, fix inherited diseases, clone mammals and be close to creating artificial life? Assuming that we will develop the necessary technology, we have 30 selected ten extinct creatures that might one day be resurrected. Our choice is based not just on practicality, but also on each animal's "charisma" - just how exciting the prospect of resurrecting these animals is. 1-3

Waiting for Answers Answers: 0
English Senior High

mainstreamⅢ chapter18 章末問題 解答教えてください!

6 Chapter 18 Comprehension a. On the basis of Gurdon's research, Yamanaka revealed that specialized cells from a mature Choose the appropriate answer. body can be transformed into iPS cells. frog. b. Gurdon placed cells from the skin of mice into an unfertilized egg cell of a c. Yamanaka took cells from the blood of mice and transformed them into a baby. d. The only difference between Gurdon's and Yamanaka's experiments was what cells they used. e. Organ rejection will no longer be a problem because it has become possible to develop organs from the patients' own cells. f. iPS cells will soon make it possible to cure all types of diseases. g. Yamanaka admits that iPS technology has done harm in some cases. h. Even as a scientist Professor Yamanaka believed that his mother saw his father's ghost. i. Professor Yamanaka has never thought of giving up research. found iPS ce j. What Professor Yamanaka wanted to say in the speech was what seems unfortunate at first may turn out to be fortunate in the end. not e mes B Choose the most appropriate main theme. a. John Gurdon and Shinya Yamanaka won the Nobel Prize because they helped each other for 40 years to create iPS cells. Chapter 18 | Minis SO 15 b. We should be careful about new technology because it takes time to put it into use and it can do harm. 24 c. Professor Yamanaka has experienced challenges in his life but they were also opportunities, one of which led to the Nobel Prize.

Waiting for Answers Answers: 0
History Junior High

社会の授業で、それぞれパリ講和会議 国際連盟、ワシントン会議 民族自決の項目があるんですけど、3つの項目にそれぞれ問題点と評価できる点を書いて5点満点で評価してまとめるんですけど全然わからなくて助けてほしいです。その3つの項目も合わせて総合的に評価しなければいけなく全くわか... Read More

本時の課題 第一次世界大戦後の世界の動きを評価しよう! A パリ講和会議議(ベルサイユ条約) 参加国:米、英、仏、伊、日(戦勝国)の五ヵ国など32ヵ国 ※米、英、仏が主導 不参加国:ドイツ(敗戦国)、ソ連(社会主義) 内容 ○国際連盟の設立[米大統領ウィルソンの十四か条の原則が審議され、1920年に設立」 0年 去裁 ○領土の処分[ドィツは植民地などを全て放棄し他の国へ【人口の10%、国土の15%を失う】」 *中国の山東半島権益、パラオマーシャル諸島の南洋諸島の管理→日本へ *アルザス·ロレーヌ地方→フランスへ返還 *ザール地方ダンツィヒ(ドイツ国内)→国際連盟が管理 ○軍備の制限[全てドイツに対して] *徴兵制は廃止 *兵器の種類や数、弾薬数を規制 参力 *陸軍、海軍の兵力を制限 *航空機、潜水艦の保有は禁止 ビの ○賠償金 *戦争責任はドイツにあるものとし、1320億マルクの賠償金を各国に支払う →現在の日本の物価などの価値に換算すると約1.5京(京は兆の次の位) 問題点 評価できる点 せキ和を目 7ミントン合議 パリ講和会議を評価すると… 5点満点で… コ

Unresolved Answers: 1