Grade

Type of questions

Mathematics Junior High

解説の意味がわからないので教えて欲しいです

問題 右の図Ⅰは,太郎さんの家の風呂を描いたもので,内側は図II のように直方体ABCD-EFGH から直方体 IJKL-MNGH を除いた 形をしている。底面 EFNMと平面 IJKL は平行になっており,底 面 EFNMを底面 Pとする。この風呂に,一定の割合で水を入れ, 20分後に水を止めた。 水を入れ始めてからx分後の底面Pから水面 までの高さをycm とする。下の表は,このときのxとyの関係を 表したものである。ただし,底面Pと水面はつねに平行になっている ものとする。 AB=65cm,BC=105cmのとき,線分 JKの長さを底面P 求めなさい。 E F ( 宮城県 ) x (57) y(cm) 0 よって, JK=QK×7-4 0 4 14 8 28 (解 右の表より,水を入れ始めて8分~12分の間に, 風呂の1段目から2段目に水が入ったことがわかる。 一方,その前後を比べると, 1段目は毎分 3.5cm, 2段目は毎分2cm の割合で水位が増加している。 水量一定で、1段目と2段目は奥行きも等しいので, 12 40 x (5) y (cm) 16 48 0 0 単位時間あたりの水位の増加量は横の長さに反比例する。 右の図より, FN: QK =2:3.5=4:7 ×7=4=105×2=45 20 56 14 45cm (図I) 太郎さんの 家の風呂 4 4 4 4 (図ⅡI) 風呂の内側 A D B IL M N 4 8 12 14 28 40 48 B 16 20 56 14 12 8 8 毎分2cm 増 J Q 毎分3.5cm 増 F K N C K G 中2で習う分野 次関数

Waiting for Answers Answers: 0
English Senior High

至急!!私立大学看護学部の過去問です。答えがないため、回答を作って欲しいです!!科目は英語です。

問題番号に対応 効とする。 うち受験票お researchers at the University of Veterinary Medicine in Vienna, Austria, have found. Dogs won't give food to a human, even if that person gave them some food first, and that they would help other dogs that had helped them before. Therefore, the team Previous studies have shown that dogs can recognize cooperative and uncooperative humans, "reciprocal altruism"- that is, doing a good thing in return to a human who had given expected to find that their test subjects would put these two things together and show To start, the team trained a group of 37 dogs to press a button which would activate a them food first. *enclosure with the dispenser, while one of (2) two humans was in a separate enclosure with the button. One would press the button to food dispenser. Then, they put each dog in an would not. Each dog was paired with both humans in give food to the dog, and (4) unhelpful one. turn. After that, the researchers switched over the button and the dispenser. They expected that the dogs would press the button to give food to the helpful human but not to the though the dogs did press the button, they did it just as often when either human had the food dispenser, and even when no human was there at all. "In these kinds of studies (5) [perform / to / dogs / which/ trained / are in a particular behavior for an experiment, they will usually do the behavior a few times as they have simply learned the association between the behavior and getting a reward, and it may be enjoyable for them to do the behavior," said Jim McGetrick, a PhD student at the University of Veterinary Medicine in Vienna who led the research. 身を正しく が本冊子 1番 2 次の英文を読んで下の設問に答えなさい。 (3) giving us some food? Are they a combination of reasons. "It is (6) Why wouldn't our best pals want to help us out by secretly all bad boys and girls? McGetrick believes there is possible that the dogs did not understand enough about the task to realize that only one of the humans was providing them with food," he said. It could also be because they didn't fully understand the button and dispenser system, or because they were too focused on the food to notice whether a particular human was pressing the button or not. "Having said all that, even if they did completely understand the task and were fully attentive to the actions of the humans, there is still a good possibility that they wouldn't have given food back in return," he added. "It could be that providing food to a dog as they do not typically do that in everyday life." After all, humans are the ones who human is something very strange for (7) already have food, from a dog's perspective. why would your pet need to worry about (8) making sure you have enough? However, all the humans in the study were people the dogs didn't know. "It is quite 5

Waiting for Answers Answers: 0
English Senior High

至急!!私立大学看護学部の過去問です。答えがないため、回答を作って欲しいです!!科目は英語です。

プペンシルで解 people than ever can find an audience time filled with disasters, online, "conspiracy theories seem to be growing crazier by the day. We also tend to believe in such things under increased stress, which is unfortunate because many of these ideas are Some conspiracy theorists pride themselves on being "critical freethinkers," but a new damaging our democracies and ourselves. study showing a connection between lower critical thinking skills and increased conspiracy (2) theory belief suggests this may not be the case. "Conspiracy theories refer to attempts to explain the ultimate cause of an important event (social, political, climatic, etc.) by accusing a hidden group of perceived evil, powerful people or organizations of having secretly planned and carried out these events," say Paris Nanterre University psychologist Anthony Lantian and team in their paper. two studies, the researchers tested the critical thinking skills of 338 a French version of the Ennis-Weir Critical Thinking Essay Test. They then scored the students' tendencies towards conspiracy beliefs and their personal Across undergraduate students (4) the objective analysis and assessment of their own critical thinking skills. Critical thinking. evaluation of a situation requires a collection of cognitive skills. These include the ability to distinguish between relevant versus irrelevant information, think systematically, see other perspectives, recognize and avoid logical *fallacies, look beyond the obvious, be aware of and avoid biases, and change your mind in light of new evidence. "The more people believe in conspiracy theories, the worse they perform on a critical thinking ability test," Lantian said. "This test is characterized by an *open-ended format highlighting several areas of critical thinking ability in the context of argumentation." (6) All this is not to say that those with high critical thinking skills can't also be sucked into believing things that may not necessarily be true. The way (7) [is wired /a/ makes / thinking/ social species / our / as] us very vulnerable to believing those we identify with as part of our own cultural group- no matter how much education we have had that boosts science literacy. Trust plays a massive role in who we believe. We also have a tendency to believe each of us is above average at detecting misinformation, which can't possibly be true. Researchers have also linked this need to feel special to greater belief in conspiracies. Lantian and team point out that while their study suggests critical thinking lowers Deople's chances of believing in untrue conspiracy theories, the findings don't determine if (8) (9) た場合,そ 数学【数学 験番号 【化学 b てお 3 In a more (1) ① 次の英文を読んで、下の設問に答えなさい。 1 - (3) the po no a E

Waiting for Answers Answers: 0
Science Junior High

答えがアなのですが、解説お願いします

Ţ 0.3 下部 回路には の向きに力を受 止した。 なお, るものとする。 を何というか、 (2点) ルに力がはた ついて述べた を1つ選び (2点) 4 観察する向き 電流計 U字形磁石 500mA 50mA 5A 消費す 器の抵 (3点) さい。 6 物質のすがた 運動の規則性, 力学的エネルギー 体のつくりと働き 山田さんの所属する科学部では,次の実験を行った。 れをもとに,以下の各問に答えなさい。 図1 [実験] 図1のよ うに、斜面が直 線になるよう に、摩擦力のな いレールと摩擦 力のあるレール テープ をつないで水平 な台の上に設置 図2 テープの長さ 記録タイマー 物体X 点A 点Aの位置で離し た物体Xの運動 問2. 物体Xは, 一辺が2cmの 金属の立方体で、質量は21.6g であった。図4は,4種類の 金属のサンプルの体積と質量 の関係を示したグラフであ 点B 向き」、 旬を用いて 質 した。 物体Xを 点A, 点Bのそ れぞれの位置で そっと離してか ら点Dを通過す るまでの運動 |時間 時間 を,1秒間に60回打点する記録タイマーでテープに記録 した。それを6打点ごとに切り,左から時間の経過順に 下端をそろえてグラフ用紙にはりつけたところ, 図 2, 図3のようになった。 物体Xを点Cの位置でそっと離し たところ,物体は静止したままであった。 図4 AC 水平な台 40 300 エ 摩擦力のない レール 図3 テープの長さ 摩擦力のある レール 問1. 基本 高いところにある物体は、重力によって 落下することで,ほかの物体の形を変えたり、動かした りすることができる。 このように高いところにある物体 がもっているエネルギーを何というか、書きなさい。 賞(2点) 点D 点Bの位置で離し 物体Xの運動 鉄」 そ り脳に伝わる。 間4. よく出る ちの1本の長さ の区間における 間 5. 点A, 点B のあるレール」 それぞれa, b ている式はどこ つ選び、その 由を書きなさ 空気の抵抗に ア. a=b= 1. a=b> ウ.a=b I. a <b *. a> b

Waiting for Answers Answers: 0