47.asはどういう役割？どういう意味？ 「～として」とか同値のいみで使われる意外になにか使い方があるんですか？ 54.alongの和訳が分かりません。 「～に沿って」ではないんですか？ 58.文構成が理解できません。 どなたか解説をお願いしたいです！

_Point018_ ーー nere as 導 iS Warmer our heay clothing YOUR(、 ) leave yo FFロ there. ①donthaveto ②hasto ⑧wont @ た)ふ 部見 。hould <京都学園大

accordingから副詞句を作っていてoffersを修飾することから、文構造の取り方は①の方ですよね？

質問です。この文章の主語はなんでしょうか？文構造が全く分かりません😭 Just when following the example of a teacher crosses a certain line where it ceases to be learning and... Read More

Just when following the example of a teacher crosses a certain line where ceases to be learning and becomes instead "*blind imitation" is not always eaSy tO aSSeSS.

自動詞他動詞を覚えることでうまれる利点を 教えてください！

6-3や7-2の文構造教えてください

ン一 ヽ 93 ム (で AA。 のっ。。 。/ 也 6 0 2) YY Wi をー しンー の UL ac Sへでム ム で eat these COOkies. ー し1 てはいけませ 6 ん」と禁正すずあ区 はど分 イダ は) We ]omn t他h Y 1 ま ト オ >を bir thdai D3 1 「 う そ 4y の 7な ・ # か び^ ( 由 と相手 ぐさ ぁ疑問詞 詞 川II 話も適するものを右から選び, d 上 Tread bo 半 ee “He lives mn 6: 国in winter. you' Im thirte ilbook?” SE

こういう問題があった場合は、どう対策とって勉強したらいいですか？？

第2問 oxoa所 入れるのに最も適当なものを, それ ぞれ下の⑩⑥の中から一っずっ人選びなさい。 ただし, 同じものを繰り返し用いな いものとする。 なお. 空所の番号は。 解答欄の解答番号と一致させてある。 (*印の 語句については,注釈を参照すること。) Bhutans mana sa Rh (Donekhe0, one cf58 langnages (jn the Tbetan langnage family) Tn the acooE Enghsh ja the GE (Oinetraedion and Dongkha teught as the saena PT @ Unsi the 1980s, the sponsored the teaching of Nepai in schools in onthern Bhutan。 With the adoption cf Daglam Namzhag and its expaneion⑨ Tnto fhe iea of strengthening the role oFDzongkha, Nepahi was dropped fom Before the 1980s, the Lhotshampa (Nepahi-speaking commun6y mainly based 近 southern Bhutan。 constitoted approximately 309% of population. However, afRier conducting the "parge of Lhotshampas from 1990E 1992 this number might not accwtately efect the eumrent 加@加 Dzongkha is parially inteligible with "Sikkimese and spoken natively bm 259%6 of the population. Tshangla, the | 19 of*the Sharchop and 福 principal pre-Tibetan Janguage of Bhutan is spoken by a greater numb記護 people. Nepali speakers constituted some 402oE the nopulaton as of 2608 The larger minority 1anguages are Dzala (1196) imbn (10%) Rheng (8%) Rai (8%). There are no reliable sources fom the ethnie om ingustc | 20 ot Bhutan, so these numbers do not add up to 1009| 注駅 : Driglam Namzhag「プブータンの伝統的礼法服装規定など5含まれる purge「追放」 Sikiimese「シッキム人(プータンとネバペーの間にあるイドのシラキム州の住民)」 the Sharchop 「プータン東部の住民』 @ carrieulam @ goernment @ mediam @ pomalaton 《⑩ composition @ jangusge

岩手大のいつかの過去問です。黄色でマーカーを引いたところの文構造と和訳を教えてほしいです。believed to beやandの使われ方が特に分かりません。 どなたか解説よろしくお願いします。

Have you hcard he welLknown claim hat onl-7 pereent ofany spoken messageia還の3 1 sherieiel us that a fuN 93 pefeent ef any message is communicared nonverbally/Tiis contcndon is 6f cours absGNute Rubbisi Thc 7-pcrccnt formula is endorscd by many professional communicaton traincrs They cell us that of hc 93 pcrcent figure refering to nonverbal Gommunicaton 53 pcrcenr is through body language and the Other 38 percent is through One GTNOice T anndcd acommunicatons workshop recendy in 《siicdh the faeiitorl uite 9 cy mphasizcd ythese seadsdcs/ wasy to put it indelicatey dumbfounded9 Tchallenged her by asking "Do you mcan that if stood jn front ofithis class and spoke yere consistent with my rp in Chinse,&s jong aymy body language and tone of rmessagey You would al understand me?9 She uecd all he communicadon Kils at her command to virtually slap me down. /She supported hcr claims by quoting the research done by the eminent psychology professor Albert Mehrabian。 The rest_of the class impresscd that this principle was being put fortn as the の7 resulr of a scientific study and not just as a myth or rumor。 nodded in agreement 1 acquiesced*。 remaining unconvinccd. 1 consulred my friend Google and did some research。 Yes。experiments were の7 conducted by Albert Mehrabian、 currcntly profcssor emeritus* of psychology at the Universiny of California at Los Angcles. But thc rcscarch in qucstion was done in 3 1967.using one word at a ime to measure [yhat thc hstcncr beliced to be the fcchng of he spcakerkndl determine iF the Istener hiked the spcaker The cxperiment was never intended to measurelhow well the jkteners understood what the spcaker was nying Q communicate. Achrabian has published his work and findimgs in thc book Sicr AMesge。(On gz his website、 Mchrabian states: “SAgr Afessgges contains a detailed discussion of my indings on inconsistent messages QP feelings and atiitudes (and the relatve importance Tam ob beginning Unformnaele 39

二行目、nothing以降の文構造がわかりません 根拠などもあれば嬉しいです よろしくお願いします🙇⤵️

1 ー ーーーーーーー~ 利 以下の英文を読んで, 次の問いに答えなさい。 pcン \ 罰 ep 宙he first language humanS had WaS geStureS. 邊here was nothing primrtiVe NN ( about this languagg/that flowed from people Ss Hands)nothim(We sayQ fine boneS could not be said 吉 the endless array' of movementS possible with the of the fngers and wrists.) The gestureS Were complex_and subt6*. nvolving a 5。 delicacy'of 二56nlba has since been lost completely 所 2 0とうとベニてア1ての|

こういう長文の時に入れるときに何を入れたらいいのかが分からなくなるんですが、 どうやってわかるんですか？？

間1 支中の空記(Ca)一(f)に (8) 1. at (b) 1. Find (c) 1、quality (dg) 1. specialist (e) 1. more (7) 1. what ee NN D D N NM ・ by Found ・ quantity Special most where oo ooのOOの 当てはまるものをそれぞれ下から一つ選び、符号で on 4.。 of Finding 4. Findings percentage 4. rato 、specialty 4 especialy less 4. 1east when 4、 which

この問題の答えは③なんですか②がなぜいけないのか教えてください！ これは文脈で判断するしかないのでしょうか？

0 の空所に入れるのに最 3 つ選べ。 et me ( ) to "休 @ talk