空所補充の問題で答えがwhomなのはわかるのですがなぜwhichがダメなのか説明出来ないので教えて頂きたいです。

20 47the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minn., interviewed a random sample of 1,321 people ages 70 to 89, most of (6) were cognitively normal, about the cognitive activities they engaged in late in life. The study, published in the rnal of Neuropsychiatry & Clinical Neurosciences, found that a/chance (7)

この問題について教えてください！

10. 図に示すように、質量M [kg] の小さいおもりと、 質量 3M [kg]の小さいおもりBを糸で結び、なめらかな 滑車Pにかける。さらに、この滑車Pと小さいおもりC を糸で結び、天井からつってあるなめらかな滑車Qにか ける。 滑車と糸の重さは無視し、重力の加速度はg [m/s 2 ] として以下の問に答えよ。 (1)はじめA,B,Cを固定し、 ついでAとBだけを 静かにはなすと、 (a) 滑車PとCを結ぶ糸の張力はいくらになるか (b) Aの加速度の大きさはいくらになるか。丁 (2)再びA,B,Cを固定し、ついでA,B,C 全 を同時に静かにはなす場合を考える。 .11 松平本 TOT SHA MANORA Sent (1) A B (a) いま、Cの質量が4M [kg] であるとき、AとBの質量の和がCの質量に等しい にもかかわらず、Cは動き始めるという。 (ア) Cの加速度の大きさはいくらか。 (イ) AとBを結ぶ糸の張力はいくらか。 (ウ) AとBは、はじめ、天井からの距離 1 [m] の同じ高さに、 Cは、 天井からの 距離 d [m] の高さにあったとする。 このAとBの高さの差がℓ [m]になるとき、 AとCの位置はどうなるか。 天井からの距離で示せ。 (b) Cが静止を続けるのは、Cの質量がいくらのときか。

2行目のallowはどういった使い方でしょうか...?allow A BでAをBに割り当てるという使い方と考えれば良いでしょうか...？

M The old must place their wisdom and experience at the service of 10 the young, yet allow the vitality, energy and enthusiasm of youth freedom of scope, while the young must respect and honor the achievements and practical sense of their elders and place their physical strength and vigor, while they still possess them, at the service of the continuing community.

下から3行目のconcern withについて質問があります。辞書で見てみるとconcern withが関心、関係があるでconcern aboutの方は心配していると出てくるのですが今回意訳を見てみると過度に気を揉みとなっています。これは関心があると訳しても良いのでしょう... Read More

not be held by others, and our own self-esteem. The evidence of our つなぐ(かれる sensitivity to social evaluative threat', coupled with the American (2) psychologist's evidence of long-term rises in anxiety, suggests that we may-by the standards of any previous society - have become highly) 追度に おいに self-conscious, overly concerned with how we appear to others, worried that we might 理解される 与える(他人から 田われる 失礼な無知 ignorant come across as unattractive, boring, (A) or whatever, and constantly trying to manage the impressions we make. And at

9行目のitが何を指しているかということと、have been thinkingが完了進行形の受動態として使われているのか、be動詞の完了形でthinkingが名詞として使われているのかわからないので教えて頂きたいです。 よろしくお願いします。

10 5 おかれる a 不気味 71 1/In a disgusting series of experiments in the early 1960s, a surgeon in America cut open the heads of monkeys and removed their brains. サ ◎Then he placed each brain on an apparatus specially designed to V3 C 機能する supply it with nutrients that would keep it alive] It seemed to work. (1) VS 0 C Brain waves were produced as they would be from a living brain 文理由 (付帯も precace 「被っているので省略さ ことが多 lasは前のもので内容が However deprived of any kind of sensory input no sights nor sounds, つまり no tastes nor smells, no touching nor feeling, no pleasure nor pain its thinking must/necessarily have been limited to memories and したにちがいない abstractions. Indeed, it may not have been thinking at all. <In most してないかもしれない animals, partial sensory deprivation can lead to hallucinations*, and ☆文を切りはす 狂気 extreme deprivation to madness, the “thoughts” of the monkey's brain can Fed lead to よくこびmay not have been meaningful or clear thoughts, but nerve cells firing randomly. M XC 1つの出来事 動名

本文下から2行目にno suchとありますが、限定詞を2つ並べることは出来ないと思っていたのですが可能なのでしょうか？

B Whatever fine-spun* theories we may devise to resolve or V3 (同) 全 obscure the difficulty, there is no use blinking the fact* that the will 大名歌、過半数 of the majority is not the same thing as the will of all, Majority rule 確定的にやくす~するともい する限り のみ、たけ 同じもの 受けれる。みてめる works well only so long as the minority is willing to accept the will of as long as the majority as the will of the nation and let it go at that*. Generally ~するのをいとわない speaking, the minority will be willing to let it go at that so long as it feels that its essential interests and rights are not fundamentally C different from those of the current (mary) and so long as it can, in 期待できる。自信をもって 支持を集める any case, look forward with confidence to mustering enough votes ② enough A to within four or six years to become itself the majority and so redress the balance*. But if it comes to pass that* a large minority feels that it 仮S 原能性 has no such chance, that it is a fixed and permanent minority and that 容れない another group or class with rights and interests fundamentally hostile a M

写真１枚目の英文（上から９段目）に質問です。 ここでのprovideは、provide O（laboratory） O（models）ですか？

英文 of 1 The one-two research punch that allowed the creation designer mice has earned the 2007 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine Mario Capecchi, a Howard Hughes Medical Institute investigator at the University of Utah in Salt Lake City, Oliver Smithies of 5 the University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, and Martin Evans of Cardif University, U.K., will share the prize for developing the techniques to make knockout mice, animals that lack a specific gene or genes. Such mice have allowed scientists to learn the roles of thousands of mammalian genes and provided laboratory models of human afflictions

画像の例文(e.g.2.)にあるdoは助動詞のdoという認識で間違えないですか？

〈so+助動詞 [be動詞]+S> は, 前述の肯定の内容を受けてSもまた・・・する」という意味 を表す。 〈nor [neither] + 助動詞 「be動詞] +S> は, 前述の否定の内容を受けてSもまた…しな 「い」という意味を表す。 助✓? e.g. 1. If he isn't going to the party, neither am I. (もしも彼がそのパーティに行かないんだったら、僕も行きません) んだったら,僕も行きません) e.g. 2. I have not been asked to resign, nor do I intend to do so. (私は辞職するように求められていないし, そうするつもりもない) ュス

分からないので教えて欲しいです🙇‍♀️

Entrance Exam 否定表現 1. almost 2. I( 1()に入れる最も適切な語句を1~4から選びなさい。 1. I don't think David would make a good leader because he can ( difficult circumstances and tends to give up too quickly. 2. extremely 3. hardly ) go to karaoke, I go only once or twice a year. ) be expected to act honorably in 4. neither (明治大) (芝浦工業大 4. never 1. often 3. Unfortunately, ( seldom ) of the 1. a few 2. few 3. ever passengers escaped injury. 3. many (大阪学院大 推) 4. much 4. ( ) children are born with musical talent. (日本大) 1. none of 2. not all. 3. not every 4. no one 5. ( 2. No 1. as far as 2. far from ) of the workers accepted the director's proposal to cut bonuses. 1. Not 6. The future of English society looked ( 7. I didn't like the food at that restaurant. It was (. (東海大 3. Never ) promising in the 1840s. None (立命館大) 3. for far 4. too far ) delicious. (福岡大) 1. anything but 2. nothing but 3. without 4. out of 8. He was so drunk that he could ( ) walk. (大阪学院大) 9. 1. all 1. able 2. unable This train doesn't stop at ( a few 3. hard 4. hardly ) station. 大阪商業大推) 2. 3. little 4. every 2. few 12. " Can 10. The latest model of this mobile phone is ( 1. not seldom 3. all not 11. Before I watched the documentary, I knew ( 1. little à you come to the party tonight?" "( 1. Yes, I can ) easy to use. (獨協大) 2. not necessarily 4. ever not 3. seldom ) about life under the sea. 4. hardly (東京工科大) ). I have a lot of homework." (拓殖大) 2. Yes, I do 3. No, I'm afraid not 13. Japan has ( 1. a little 2. few 4. No, I hope not ) oil and therefore is almost entirely dependent on imports. (センター) 3. little 4. small

和訳最初のほうの、ワンツーパンチ級の研究、の意味がわからないです。すごい、みたいな感じですか？

テーマ 9 専門性☆☆☆/英文レベル★★ | ノックアウト･マウス [英文] 11 The one-two research punch that allowed the creation of designer mice has earned the 2007 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine.Mario Capecchi, a Howard Hughes Medical Institute investigator at the University of Utah in Salt Lake City, Oliver Smithies of 5 the University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, and Martin Evans of Cardiff University, U.K., will share the prize for developing the techniques to make knockout mice, animals that lack a specific gene or genes. Such mice have allowed scientists to learn the roles of thousands of mammalian genes and provided laboratory models of human afflictions 10 in which to test potential therapies.」