Grade

Type of questions

Chemistry Undergraduate

熱力学について質問です。 問題文の一定の外圧1.00atmをどう扱ったら良いかよく分かりません。自分でとりあえず解いてみたんですが合ってる自信あまりないです。もし分かる方いらっしゃいましたら、ご教授していただけませんか?🙇‍♂️

Problem 2 A sample consisting of 1.00 mol of perfect gas molecules at 300 K is expanded isothermally from initial pressure of 3.00 atm of a final pressure of 1.00 atm against a constant external pressure of 1.00 atm. Determine the values of q, w, AU, AH, AS, ASsur, and AStotal. 300Kにある完全気体 1.00mol の試料が、 温度一定で始めの圧力 3.00 atm から終わりの圧 カ 1.00 atm まで、一定の外圧 1.00 atm に抗して、 膨張する。 この過程に対して、9, w, AU,AH, AS, AS r, ASiosal を求めよ。 管品可運勝張より、Tが喫化しないためるリ=D 始めの体様をV終わりの体殊をソュとおくと. V, = 8.314× 300 スH- AU + PAV 1660 [コ] 1660 8.21×(o°[m] AS = = 5.53 [h] 300 ニ 3×1, 013 × /D" Vz = 8.314x300 1.013× [0 外界が理た熱置はdisur = -AHよ) = 0.0276 [m] ASsur- 「desur T 1660 300-5.53[7h] Pdv = -1.013 x /0°x (0.0246- 8.21Y16') - こ M AStotal こ AS + ASU- = -1660 LJ] AV= 9+ W より 1 - -w- 1660[5] 0 Problem 3 Calculate the change in the molar entropy at 1 atm when a solid ethanol at 159 K of the melting point changes

Solved Answers: 1
English Senior High

見辛かったらすみませんが、問2の英作文の添削をしていただきたいです🤲

2015年度 英語 13 They should not have to lose their livelihoods. Secondlv. although I agree 次の英文は、英語のディベートの授業での対話です。この対話を読み,下の問い に答えなさい。 with Keiko that climate change is a serious problem, I think air travel is a much less damaging source of carbon pollution than, for example, burnimg MR. ROBERTS: Good morning, everybody. Today we have the first of our Coal. We should address these more serious causes first. Finally, the most student debates. The topic this morning is air travel, and the argument is. 法 important reason is the issue of freedom. People in a democracy expect the “Domestic air travel in Japan should be discouraged." Keiko will first argue right to travel as they wish. It has made our lives more convenient and in favor of the proposal and Junko will speak against. Over to you, Keiko. created more opportunities for everyone. We should not reduce our quality of life. Thank you for listening. KEIKO: Good morning, everybody. I am going to speak today in favor of the proposal. Limitless air travel inside Japan is a luxury that we can no longer MR. ROBERTS: Thank you to our two speakers. Now, are there any afford. The main reason is that it is extremely damaging to the questions from the audience? environment. The carbon gases produced by aircraft are very high and are a 頭人 proven cause of global warming. Therefore, we should try and reduce air 問1 次の(1)~(5)の文について, 本文の内容と一致するものには○.一致しないも travel as much as possible to protect the environment, not only for Japan but のには×を,それぞれ解答欄に記入しなさい。 also for the whole world. Secondly, air travel is actually unnecessary within the four islands of Japan. Now, while I appreciate that travel to Okinawa is (1) Keiko's main reason for opposing domestic air travel is the damage it a different case, there are efficient train services throughout Japan that are causes to the environment. h fast and environmentally friendly. These make an excellent alternative to air (2) Keiko thinks that air travel is cheap and efficient. flights, so there is really no need to use airplanes in most cases. Finally, (3) Keiko recommends that people travel between Okinawa and mainland there is an economic reason. Air travel is expensive for passengers because Japan by ship. the price of fuel keeps increasing, but airline companies are still struggling (4) Junko thinks that climate change is not an important problem. to make profits. Moreover, regional airports often cannot attract enough (5) Junko thinks that a lot of jobs will be lost if air travel is reduced. customers, and, overall, the industry is not cost-effective, It's time to admit that air travel is too damaging and expensive to be sustainable. Thank you. 問2 次の質問に英語で答えなさい。 Which of the two speakers do you more agree with? Give at least one JUNKO: Thank you, Keiko. I am going to disagree with the proposal for three reason for your answer. (解答欄:13.8cm×4行) reasons. Firstly, I think there is a strong economic case to support flying. Many jobs depend on air travel, not just the pilots and cabin staff, but also people who work in airports or for airlines, or who rely on fast transport.

Waiting for Answers Answers: 0
English Senior High

見辛かったらすみませんが、問2の英作文の添削をしていただきたいです🤲

2015年度 英語 13 They should not have to lose their livelihoods. Secondlv. although I agree 次の英文は、英語のディベートの授業での対話です。この対話を読み,下の問い に答えなさい。 with Keiko that climate change is a serious problem, I think air travel is a much less damaging source of carbon pollution than, for example, burnimg MR. ROBERTS: Good morning, everybody. Today we have the first of our Coal. We should address these more serious causes first. Finally, the most student debates. The topic this morning is air travel, and the argument is. 法 important reason is the issue of freedom. People in a democracy expect the “Domestic air travel in Japan should be discouraged." Keiko will first argue right to travel as they wish. It has made our lives more convenient and in favor of the proposal and Junko will speak against. Over to you, Keiko. created more opportunities for everyone. We should not reduce our quality of life. Thank you for listening. KEIKO: Good morning, everybody. I am going to speak today in favor of the proposal. Limitless air travel inside Japan is a luxury that we can no longer MR. ROBERTS: Thank you to our two speakers. Now, are there any afford. The main reason is that it is extremely damaging to the questions from the audience? environment. The carbon gases produced by aircraft are very high and are a 頭人 proven cause of global warming. Therefore, we should try and reduce air 問1 次の(1)~(5)の文について, 本文の内容と一致するものには○.一致しないも travel as much as possible to protect the environment, not only for Japan but のには×を,それぞれ解答欄に記入しなさい。 also for the whole world. Secondly, air travel is actually unnecessary within the four islands of Japan. Now, while I appreciate that travel to Okinawa is (1) Keiko's main reason for opposing domestic air travel is the damage it a different case, there are efficient train services throughout Japan that are causes to the environment. h fast and environmentally friendly. These make an excellent alternative to air (2) Keiko thinks that air travel is cheap and efficient. flights, so there is really no need to use airplanes in most cases. Finally, (3) Keiko recommends that people travel between Okinawa and mainland there is an economic reason. Air travel is expensive for passengers because Japan by ship. the price of fuel keeps increasing, but airline companies are still struggling (4) Junko thinks that climate change is not an important problem. to make profits. Moreover, regional airports often cannot attract enough (5) Junko thinks that a lot of jobs will be lost if air travel is reduced. customers, and, overall, the industry is not cost-effective, It's time to admit that air travel is too damaging and expensive to be sustainable. Thank you. 問2 次の質問に英語で答えなさい。 Which of the two speakers do you more agree with? Give at least one JUNKO: Thank you, Keiko. I am going to disagree with the proposal for three reason for your answer. (解答欄:13.8cm×4行) reasons. Firstly, I think there is a strong economic case to support flying. Many jobs depend on air travel, not just the pilots and cabin staff, but also people who work in airports or for airlines, or who rely on fast transport.

Waiting for Answers Answers: 0
English Senior High

長文の下の9番の答えを教えください

measures to encourage tap water use. In Britain, bottles restrict the consumption of bottled water. In the United States, the Conference of Mayors in 2008 voted to take of water are no longer served at government meetings. 4 Around the world, many countries have started to VBWB restrict [ristrikt] consumption [kansámpJen] conference [ká:nfarans] mayor(s) [méior(z)] measure(s) [mézar(z)] 1-サムフェーし コv15しス government 5 [gávarnmont] Clearly, the movement against bottled water is growing. significant significant [signífikant] カンサプンョン B while the consumption of bottled water is a environmental concern in the developed world, the lack of concern [kansá:rn] clean drinking water is a major health problem in the developing world. developingldivelopig) The World Health Organization has 10 billion [biljan] found that over one billion people, mainly in poorer whatsoever [wAtsouévar] supplies [saplaiz] <supply portion [p5:r an] Countries, have no access to safe water whatsoever. 6 In order to improve world water supplies, some companies in the U.S. have started donating a portion of donation(s) [dounéijon(2)) sales from bottled water. Donations and lifestyle changes 15 will not immediately solve these global problems, but they direction [darékfan] are a small step in the right direction. Remember this the next time you think about buying a bottle of water. 9. in the developing worldと対比されている表現を抜き出しなさい。 3. the Conference of Mayors (全米)市長会 3. take measures 対策を講じる 10. the World Health Organization 世界保健機関 (WHO) 12. no access to safe water whatsoever = no access to safe water at all

Waiting Answers: 1