Grade

Type of questions

English Senior High

この長文がどんな話なのか理解できません😥 出来れば段落ごとに要約して頂けると助かります😔 よろしくお願いします!!!!!!!!!🙇🏽‍♀️🙇🏽‍♀️

We are,(to a remarkable degree, the right distance from the right sort of star, one e 5 of ten billion and we wouldn't be here now./ We are also fortunate to orbit where we that is big enough to radiate lots of energy, but not so big as to burn itself out swiftly t 1s a curiosity bf physics that the larger a stor the more rapidly it burns. Had our sun Ocen ten times as massive、it would have evhonsted itself after ten million years instead of do. 1o0 much nearer and evervthing on Farth would have boiled away. Much rarther away and everything would have frozen. の14 m 1978, an astrophysicist named Micheel Hart made some calculations and Concluded that Earth would have been uninhabitable had it been just 1 percent rartner That's not much, and in fact it wasn't enough. percent 10 from or 5.percent closer to the Sun. The figures have since been refined and made a little more generous 5 nearer and I5 percent farther are thought to be more accurate assessments 1oI om zone of habitability - but that is still a narrow belt. To appreciate just how narrow, you have only to look at Venus. Venus 1s only ©10 15 twenty-five million miles closer to the Sun than we are. The Sun's warmth reaches it just two minutes before it touches us. In size and composition, Venus is very like Earth, but the small difference in orbital distance made all the difference to (3)how it turned out. It appears that during the early years of the solar system Venus was only slightly warmer than Earth and probably had oceans. But those few degrees of extra 20 warmth meant that Venus could not hold on to its surface water, with disastrous consequences for its climate. As its water evaporated, the hydrogen atoms escaped into space, and the oxygen atoms combined with carbon to form a dense atmosphere of the greenhouse gas CO2. Venus became stifling. Although people of my age will recall a time when astrononmers hoped that Venus might harbor life beneath its padded 25 clouds, possibly even a kind of tropical vegetation, we now know that it is much too fierce an environment for any kind of life that we can reasonably conceive of. Its surface temperature is a roasting 470 degrees centigrade (roughly 900 degrees Fahrenheit), which is hot enough to melt lead, and the atmospheric pressure at the surface is ninety times that of Earth, or more than any human body could withstand We lack the technology to make suits or even spaceships that would allow us to visit Our knowledge of Venus's surface is based on distant radar imagery and som。 disturbing noise from an unmanned Soviet probe that was dropped hopefully into the

Solved Answers: 1
English Senior High

And と bad の違いについて教えて頂けないでしょうか?🙇‍♂️🙇‍♂️🙇‍♂️ 赤のハイライトの「そのような論理は成立しません。」とは具体的にどう言う事を意味しますか? 「逆説」でも「そして」でも意味が通じるのでbutでもandどちららでも良いと思いました。 よろ... Read More

ta:m hez nars dramz and hi *nev.a let 'en.i.wan トムは素晴らしいドラムを持っていますが、誰にも使わ せません。 Tom has nice drums, and he never lets (anygne els pler dem else)play them. V「が」は but ? V「~させる」は? 日本語の「が」には注意が必要です。英語の but は「論理の逆転」を意味しますが、日本語の「が」は必ずしも論 理の逆転を意味しません。つまり but かは慎重に論理を吟味する必要があるのです。 本文では「ドラムを持っている」ことと「人に使わせない」こ との論理関係が問題になります。もし「ドラムを持っている」 「人にそれを貸す義務が生じる」というのなら、「ドラムを持って いる」と「人に貸さない」 との間には逆接の関係が成立します。 しかし、そのような論理は成立しません。 ですから英語にする場合は、ここでは but くて and を使うことになります。 however この文の「させる」は許可を意味しますのでlet か allow を用 います。let はビートルズの“Let It Be"からもわかるとおり〈let +0+動詞の原形〉ですが、allow は〈allow +O+ to(V)〉で however を使うかどう す。なお let の方が口語的な表現です。 V「誰にも」はanyone か someone か? 否定文ですから anyone あ るいは anybody を用います。 someone を使うことはできません。また、「他の誰にも」と考え て else をつけた方がより適切な文となります。 however ではな Vドラムはadrum か drums か? V目的語の省略 「誰にも使わせません」の「(楽器を)使う」は play を用いるこ とになりますが、当然ながら目的語が必要となります。つまり 「それを使う」と補って play themとする必要があるわけです。 日本語は主語のみならず目的語も省略することが多いので注意が 日本語では単数形ですが、ふつうドラムのセットは複数のドラ ムから成りますから drums とします。これと似た例として earrings「イヤリング」、manners 「マナー」などがあります。 逆に日本語のカタカナでは複数形のように感じても、英語では 単数形にするものはa suit「スーツ」、a fruit「フルーツ」、a T-shirt「Tシャツ」などがあります。 必要です。

Solved Answers: 1
English Senior High

英語 下線部の文構造を教えて下さい。和訳では無いです。

次の英文の第2パラグラフ以降の内容を 50 字~ 60 字の日本語に要約 せよ。句読点も字数に含める。 のHideki Shirakawa won the 2000 Nobel Prize for chemistry Tuesday for discovering that plastic can conduct electricity. He is the second Japanese laureate in this field, following Ken-ichi Fukui. 2The fact that Japan has far fewer Nobel laureates in science 5 than other advanced countries like the United States, Britain, Germany and France is indicative of howlittle importance the nation places on basic science. O Although Japan has poured great resources into the development of practical technologies, it has not sufficiently supported basic research. ① The nation urgently needs to develop talented human resources. 10 It must implement policies that will allow young scientists to better concentrate on research, and establish a system that can objectively evaluate the results of their research. ⑤ Basic scientific research in fields such as chemistry and physics tends to garner little public recognition because it is not flashy. It is unfortunate that our citizens do not have a higher regard for the research that has established the foundation upon which our wealthy Saciety is built. 6The fact that Shirakawa won a Nobel Prize suggests that there may be other talented Japanese scientists who have yet to be recognized. We hope that the recognition of Shirakawa's scientific

Solved Answers: 1