49行目についてなのですがhealthy enoughを十分健康と捉えてしまったのですが和訳がほどほどに健康となっていました。なぜそのように捉えたのか分からないので教えて頂きたいです。よろしくお願いいたします。

45 distribution was valid; all the rest had to be thrown ou the IQ scores now fall into a bell curve mainly because that is where the original English and American *psychometricians thought they should fall. But suppose they'd started out with different preconceptions. Suppose they believed that "intelligence" was something like "health": some people were weak and some were strong, but most people were "healthy enough." Their bodies may have been shaped differently, but one 50 type couldn't be called healthier than another. In that case, the distribution of IQ scores would have been very different.

以前画像3枚目の様に修飾限定予告のthatというものを習ったので今回もその形なのかと思い、それらのと入れずに訳してしまったのですがこのthoseの識別は文脈判断ということでしょうか？ 教えて頂きたいです。よろしくお願いいたします。

実理 K The starting point for today's *meritocracy, of course, is the idea that intelligence exists and can be measured, like weight or strength or fluency in French. The most obvious difference between intelligence and these other traits is that all the others are presumably changeable. If someone weighs too much, he can go on a その人 →Heyで受けるのが一般的 5 diet; if he's weak, he can lift weights; if he wants to learn French, he can take a course. But in principle he can't change his intelligence. There is another important difference 原則として MV between intelligence and other traits. Height and weight and speed and strength and サフィス体例 関係性が強い文がくる even conversational fluency are real things; there's no doubt about what's being 間違いなん measured. Intelligence is a much murkier concept. Some people are generally (2) m2 Vogue 10 smarter than others, and some are obviously talented in specific ways; they're chess 天才 S masters, math *prodigies. But can the factors that make one person seem quicker than another be measured precisely, like height and weight? Can we confidently say that one person is 10 percent smarter than another, in the same way we can say he's 10 へんて、いつだっ S percent faster in the hundred-yard dash? And can we be confident that two thirds of 櫂へん 言いかえ 15 all people have IQs within one standard deviation of the norm that is, between 90 ように and 110 - - as we can be sure that two thirds of all people have heights within one standard deviation of the norm for height? Yes, they can, and yes, we can. besure least, are the answers that the IQ part of the meritocracy rests on. Those, at (3)-

高二英語 ⑧ 答えは1です。4と1で迷いました。解説していただきたいです。よろしくお願いします🤲

possible answers to this, one is poetic and a little sad, while the others are far more practical. The first concerns the English scientist, Alan Turing. This brilliant man is ( ⑧) to be the father of modern computing. It is in no (⑨) part thanks to him that World War Two ended in 1945 and not two or three years (①), for it was he who

長文のI（私）がmiyazakiのことなんですけど、I wasn't angryで本当に怒ってないことはわかるんですが、They were expressing their anger から起こる表現はしてることが分かるから、3の問題は間違っていて、Fではないんですか？

In London, I live うけいれる money. No gallery accepted my paintings. My street artist friends and I thought it was cool to look angry. They 表現 were expressing their anger at social injustice, and their anger was real. But I was from まったくない an ordinary family living an ordinary life. I wasn't angry at all. I was in London for two years, but still I wasn't a famous artist. I decided I had to find a different way of expressing myself.

Known for its high-quality portraits and portfolio that includes several Boston mayors and other high-profile Bostonians, as well as its ... Read More

3行目から4行目にかけてorが並列されているのですが並列は,で区切って最後だけorではないのでしょうか？教えて頂きたいです。よろしくお願いいたします。

An instance of the nominal fallacy is most easily seen when the meaning or importance of a term or concept shrinks with knowledge. One example of this would 定 153 be the word "instinct." "Instinct" refers to a set of behaviors whose actual cause we Bot s Simbly. Th don't know, or simply don't understand or have access to, and therefore we call them 本能的 先天性 生得的 ・遺伝 15 instinctual, inborn, innate. Often this is ( 2 ). They are the "nature" part of the 3(442-3) 中の nature-nurture argument (a term itself likely a product of the nominal fallacy) and therefore can't be broken down or reduced any further. But experience has shown that this is rarely the truth. 潜在仮定

答え合っていますでしょうか😭😭 13番と14番が分かりません、、。 そう考える根拠(私のメモ)も間違っていたら指摘して頂きたいです😭😭

11. (for water, there would have been no survivorsえない 1 But ② Except Jon 3 Yet - if it were not Ref.c. 12. ( ) I in his position, I would 生き残った人ws beco ④ Without うしろにfor <兵庫医科大〉 ① Weretend oil ② Amd 97gd blue ③ Would be STO④ →仮定法やコ完了 つけない tor ld turn down that offer. D Soam ode( 〈工学院大〉 汁接をしょうりゃくすると疑問文の語順になるから If I were in his position i 信じられない ② unless T ③ has 4 had 〈杏林大〉 13. She would not have believed her eyes ( ) she not experienced so many incredible 009 経験をつんだ ? incidents. 大 27. ① if ? DUL 14. ( ② Could 3 Will ) you have any questions about the assignment, please do not hesitate to contact me. ためらう 1 Should 〈南山大 〉 ④ Might 15. ( ) your support, I would not have completed this work. ① Had it not been for ② Had it not been If it had not beenのifの 3 If it did not have 16. ( ① If Unless dot, boog s )more patience, you could have overcome the problems. しんぼう のりこえられるだろう 3 Were bluo apie tavinu i mo'il 997 ~があれば (大) ④ If it have not been for しょうりゃく <近畿大〉 Mid 空 ④W ④ With <東京国際大〉 意味がある 意味がとおる Ved liw D

答え合っているでしょうか😭😭 6、8の答えとそれになる理由が分かりません、、😭😭10番は、It is timeに注目して仮定法過去をつかうから③と考えましたが、それで合っていますか？？

2 6. We wish they ( ) so much. We believe we responded in good faith. 答えだ ①aren't complaining blot 2 don't complain bluor④won't complain 善意 blot ved bio) Is of beau )me earlier. It's too late to do anything about it now. それを今やるのはもう手遅れ もっとはやく言ってくれればよかった 1dという願いはつなげだから <亜細亜大〉 3 didn't complain 7. I wish you ( 1 have told ? 8. If only I ( 1 were 2 can tell 3 are telling 9T9W 4 had told ) allowed to have a dog. The problem is my father hates dogs! 3 will be a fast 4 should be I ( 2 must be 〈日本大 9. It is time that women ( ) given better opportunities to use their superior knowledge. 31312167 2107 → xa 3 have been ④ was 1 is x 2 were 29921 1992 2611 10. If it ( ) not for his help, I would never be able to complete the project. ② been < 東洋大 > きい。 (3) were ow 90 ods 4 has been 〈広島経済大 > rude fl Vrst bech 1 is 11.( →仮定法やコ完了 1 But 2 Except Jon 3 Yet ) for water, there would have been no survivors. T 除く Without for () つけない

The word "robot" was introduced into English by a 1920 Czech play called "R.UR," at the end of which, robots kill every human except one.... Read More

この文章は形式主語構文です。thatの後が完全文なら形式主語構文と解説にはあるのですが、constructedの後に目的語がないのにどうして完全文だと言えるのですか？

It is a common misconception [that the pyramids (of Egypt) S V 接 were constructed 〈by slave labor〉 ]. 〈In fact〉, archaeological V' M' M research indicates [that the laborers were recruited (from V 01 接 S' V₁₁ S paid].ww 〈among poor farmers>>] [and [that they were paid]. M₁ 接 O2→接 S'2 '2'2 日本語訳例 *2 エジプトのピラミッドが奴隷たちの労働によって建設されたというのは,よくある 誤解だ。実際,考古学的な研究によると,そうした労働者は貧しい農民の中から集 ※1 ※4 6 められ,賃金が支払われていたということがわかっている。 30*7