Grade

Type of questions

Mathematics Senior High

変な質問かもしれませんが、答え方で〜の時ー、と答える時と答えだけまとめて書く時の違いがわかりません。1枚目の(4)はx >1とx <1で場合分けしていますが、答えはx=で場合わけによって出た答え2つをまとめて書いてあり、2枚目の(2)はa=◯のときx=△と分けて書いてあり、... Read More

164 1/19 基本 例題 96 いろいろな2次方程式の解法 次の方程式を解け。 (2)√2x25x+2√2 = 0 (4) x2+x+x-1|=5 (1 3 (1) -0.5x²-2x+10=0 (3) 3(x+1)+5(x+1)-2=0 指針 (1), (2) 係数に小数や分数、無理数が含まれていて, そのまま解くと計算が面倒になる。 から, 係数はなるべく整数 (特に2次の係数は正の整数) になるように式を変形 (1) 両辺を (2) 倍する。 (2) 両辺を√2倍する。 (3)x + 1 =Xとおき, まずXの2次方程式を解く。 (4) p.73 基本例題41 と方針はまったく同じ。 | |内の式 = 0 となるの値はメニ であることに注目し,x≧1, x1 の場合に分ける。 (1) 両辺に2を掛けて x2+3x-20=0 解答 よって x= 3±√32-4・1・(-20) = -389 (2) 両辺に√2 を掛けて よって x= 2.1 2x2-5√2x+4=0)(+ 5√2±√(-5√2)²−4·2·4 2 2.2 5√2±3/2 まずは、解きやすい 方程式を変形する。 0-(1- 4 となり √-5√2)-4-2-4 =√18=3√2 5√2+3√2=8/2, 5√2-3√2-2√2 √2 したがって x=22. 2 S (3) x+1=Xとおくと 3X2+ 5X-2=0 <1 2-6 1 3 -1--1 よって (X+2) (3X-1)=0 ..X=-2, 3 3 -25 注意 ...は「ゆえに」を 1 すなわち x+1=-2, 2 よって x=-3, 3 す記号である。 3 (4)[1] x≧1のとき, 方程式は x2+x+x-1=5 x-10であるから 整理すると x2+2x-6=0 |x-1|=x-1 これを解くと x=-1±√1−1・(-6)=-1±√7 x≧1 を満たすものは x=-1+√7 [2] x<1のとき, 方程式は 整理すると x2=4 x<1 を満たすものは [1], [2] から, 求める解は 01- この確認を忘れずに x²+x-(x-1)=5 よって x=±2 x=-2 x10 であるから |x-1|=(x-1) この確認を忘れずに x=-2,-1+√7解をまとめておい

Resolved Answers: 1
English Senior High

赤い下線のところがどういう構造になっているか分からないです、教えてくださいm(_ _)m

moving from " (1) 点) There are historians and others who would like to make a neat division between "historical facts" and "values." The trouble is that values even enter into deciding what count as facts-there is a big leap involved in 'raw data" to a judgement of fact. More important, one finds that the more complex and multi-levelled the history is, and the more important the issues it raises for today, the less it is possible to sustain a fact-value division. But this by no means implies that there has simply to be a conflict of prejudices and biases, as the data are manipulated to suit one worldview or another. What it does mean is that the self of the historian is an important factor. The historian is shaped by experiences, contexts, norms, values, and beliefs. When dealing with history, especially the sort of history that is of most significance in philosophy, that shaping is bound to be relevant. As far as possible it needs to be articulated and open to discussion. The best historians are well aware of this. They are alert to many dimensions of bias and to the endless (and therefore endlessly discussable) significance of their own horizons and presuppositions. A great deal can of course be learned from those who do not share our presuppositions. Our capacity to make wise, well-supported judgements in matters of historical fact and significance can only be formed over years of discussion with others, many of whom have very different horizons from our own. It is possible to I have a 12-year-old chess champion or mathematical or musical genius, but it is unimaginable that the world's greatest expert on Socrates could be that age. The difficulty is not just one of the time to assimilate information; it is (2)

Resolved Answers: 1
59/1000