too…to so that -can’t enough to の使い分けの仕方ってありますか？ 答えにどれか一つしか書いてないので、それ以外は不正解なのか気になったので質問してみました。 （↑例えば、問題に指定がなく自分がso thatの文を答えとして書いて、答えにe... Read More

接続詞です。全然分かりません、上の問題もあってるか分かりません😭😭教えてください

実戦問題 に適する語(句) をア~エから1つ選びなさい。 1 次の (1) The actress is famous not only in Japan ア and but also in the U.S. or I SO yesterday was a national holiday, my father had to go to the office. 7 Although But If I However Jon (3) My grandmother worked as a nurse for thirty years 7 because <if (2) while I until Bill's mother, but in fact she is his grandmother. B was will be I is going to be (4) I thought she 7 is (5) I'll call you after I 7 finish イ my homework. finished will finish I am finishing she was sixty. に適する語を書きなさい。 2 次の各組の文がほぼ同じ内容になるように, (1) It's cloudy tonight, so we can't see any stars in the sky. We can't see any stars in the sky because it's cloudy tonight. (2) [I visited many temples during my stay in Kyoto. I visited many temples I (3) You may cut yourself if you are not careful. careful, you may cut yourself. (4) Though he was very tired, he finished his work. He was very tired, he finished his work. (5) He bought hamburgers. His brother bought hamburgers, too. his brother bought hamburgers. he (3) A: I usually don't have breakfast. B: (early/get/have/ you'll/up/,) enough time. *1 〈中央大附属〉 3 次の 内の語(句) を並べかえなさい。 ただし, (3)4) は不足する1語を補うこと。 (1) A: (about/ hear/I/know/ Japanese history/you/that) very well. B: Yes. It's very interesting to me. (4) A: What are you going to do tomorrow? B: Well, I'll (it /if/ my blanket/ sunny/wash). *1 in Kyoto. 〈拓大第一〉 < 慶應 > 〈西南学院〉 (2) (cell phone / go / in / leave /to/ the living room / when / you/your) school. (★Â) <土佐塾 >

どこを抜き出して答えればいいのか分からないので答えをお願いします🙇‍♀️もし出来れば解説もお願いします🙏

次の英文を読み、以下の問いに答えなさい。 Cow. Chicken. Grass. Which two are in the same group? Your answer depends on where you were born and raised. T fedt af gnofed For a long time, *research psychologists have had an idea that East Asians and Westerners think about the world in different ways. There was not enough scientific *evidence to support this idea until recently. In the past 15 years, however, researchers have learned a lot about different thinking styles and the cultural differences that produce them. The story begins in 1972, when *Liang-Hwang Chiu, a professor of *educational psychology at *Indiana University, tested more than 200 Chinese and 300 American children. He showed some cards to each child. Each card had pictures of three things. One card, for example, showed a cow, a chicken, and grass. Chiu asked the children to say which two things were in the same group. Most of the American children picked the chicken and cow. They explained the reason by saying that "both are animals." Most of the Chinese children, however, put the cow and grass together because "cows eat grass." solib - People didn't think Chiu's study was very important in the years after its *publication because $*psychological scientists at that time paid little attention to cultural differences. In the 1990s, however, *cross-cultural psychology became 2"hot" and Chiu's findings were paid attention to again. 3 Researchers at the University of Michigan did Chiu's study again by testing college students from China, Taiwan, and the United States. Without using pictures, the researchers gave the students with and asked them to say which two three words shampoo, hair, and conditioner, for example 20 were in the same group. The Americans were more likely than the Chinese to say that shampoo and conditioner go together because they're both hair care goods. The Chinese were more likely to say that shampoo and hair go together because "shampoo washes and cleans hair." Why do East Asians and Westerners think differently? Most researchers believe the answer can be Taplapo 77 Step A Step B Step C

You are enough old to go to school. この文の（enough old to go）の何が誤りなのでしょうか？ 伝わりにくくてごめんなさい💦

It was bad enough when Edward Hyde was only an unknown name, but now that the lawyer knew something about Hyde, the will worried him more... Read More

1番答えを教えてほしいです。解説もお願いしたいです！

4 (1) This condition may be good 2. Jenough 1. as (2) I think +/21 certain chemicals to form together. SY 3. for 4. how 5. so /highly unlikely that he'll come in time. 1. about 2. as (3.) it 4. of 5. that Who do you think the good novelists of today ? n

(１)がわかりません教えてください！

B 次の(1)~(3)の英文中の下線部ア~エの中で誤りのあるものを1つずつ選び,記号 で答えよ。 また, 例にならって正しい英語を書け。 例: Our party is not formal, so whether not very important. 解答: エ → is or not you wear dress shoes イ (1) Obuse is a town in Nagano and it is bicycle. to see a doctor enough small to because my back I 移動する get around ウ hurts. are by I

(1)です。問題の右側に不定詞で考えてって書いてあったんですけど見てなくって普通に英文として考え、書いてしまったのですが、一応○か✕、どちらになるのか知っておきたくて…○、✕、どっちになりますか？？教えてください🙏

の文。 どの用 to+ 形にな what, didn't, next, ませんでした。 to, they, know, do ). 5右のメモを見て,後の質問に英語で答えなさい。 (1) Why does Meg study 名前: Meg English every day? (2) What does Meg like to do? 将来の夢 英語の先生になること。 ・そのために毎日英語を勉強している。 . 好きなもの 好きなこと ・ネコ ピアノの演奏 San Paw 〈疑問詞+不定詞> の種類を調べてみ よう。 5 (1) 目的を表す不 定詞で答える。

(１)と(3)教えてください🙏

5 <注意すべき表現〉 次の各組の文がほぼ同じ意味になるように,空所に適語を書きなさい。 He was so lucky that he could get a ticket for the concert. He was lucky (1) O COACUT get a ticket for the concert. WD > the { I was so tired that I couldn't finish the work. Tinish the w ☐(2) □ (3) I was tired Emilch This coffee is so hot that I can't drink it. This coffee is hot 5STXYCO CT 6 || work.ordas:)) to drink.

青線部はなぜ受け身ですか？

The new chief <of the U.S. Forest Service> explains [that there is 551V3 S a new and better way <to save our forests>]. He says, “Small fires S V 4 Os S' are part <of nature>. They clear away the dead and sick trees, so O' V' there will be enough room <for new trees>." V' S' ⑤ (Now) the Forest Service has new plans. S V 0 They will start small S V 550 fires (in forests), but they will control the fires. There will be such SV 0 V SEU fires (in parts <of the forests <which are full ( of dead and sick V' trees) >>). The people <who watch the forests have a plan <to burn V O V S 30,000 acres (a year) (for the next 20 years)>. 15 20 ⑥ The chief said, “The forests have become dead and sick (in many 38857 S V Os V CM years), and so we need more than 20 years (to solve the problem (by25 S' V' O' using controlled fires))." ・日 ⑨ 合衆国林野部の新長官は、森を守るための 新しくより優れた方法があると説明している。 「小さな火事は自然の一部である。そうした火 事は枯れたり病んだりした木を取り除き、新し unayoin ESTLATEN EGU い木が育つ十分な場所ができるだろう」と彼は 言う。und wilom of edsona bra ⑤ 現在, 林野部には、 新しい計画がある。 彼 -10% らは森で小さな火事を起こそうとしているが, 彼らはその火事を管理するのである。 枯れたり 病んだりした木であふれた森の一部で,そうし た火事が起こされるであろう。 森林監視員たち は,今後20年間に1年当たり3万エーカーを 燃やすことを計画している。 6 imbrckolgoogla 長官は「森は長年のうちに枯れたり病んだ りしているので管理された火事を使って問題 を解決するには20年以上が必要である」と言 った。