Grade

Type of questions

English Junior High

学校で使っているNew crawn(3年)という教科書に "In Asia, cranes are a symbol of long life" という文があったのですが、なぜareの後にaが来るのでしょうか?

became sick. At first she thought that she just had a cold When Sadako was in elementary school, wanted to be a P.E. teacher when she grew up. Sado hospital with her family. A doctor told her parents, “She old. (At least 130,000 people died by the end of the ye USERead However, her sickness got"worse, especially liked her P.E. class and was good at sports. g a member of the relay team for the school's sports day.to go back to school. She never lost hope. Sadako made was a fast runner.(In' the sixth grade, she was selected fold paper cranes and'wished for good health. She wanted 広島平和記念資料館のパンフレ 物語文 The Story of Sadako Text aflash INa]閃光 atleast 少なとも Jend [éndj 終わり Isurvive(d) Isarvaiv(d)] 生き残る elementary lelaméntaril 初級の Words Zat first 最初 安然は 2have a cold かぜをひいて のsickness lementary school lélaméntari skò:1} 小学校 pecially lispéfpli こりわけ get worse About a month after the sports day, Sadako sudderíly の an ato cancer |k 図eause(é 引き起こ Dw up 成長する aner |ránar| 走者 ect(ed) [salekt(3d) 2receiv ye 受け取 so she went to the Pgo ba y Iri:lei]リレー競走 but she survived. hasla' kind of cancer」causedby the bomb..I/dou6t she'ル survive for more than' one year." へ以上は In the hospital, Sadako received some paper cranes. In Asia, cranes are a symbol of long life. Sadako began to 決して over 1,000 cranes. However, she never left the hospital. Her life ended when she was only twelve. たありません 損子さんが折った折

Resolved Answers: 1
English Senior High

見辛かったらすみませんが、問2の英作文の添削をしていただきたいです🤲

2015年度 英語 13 They should not have to lose their livelihoods. Secondlv. although I agree 次の英文は、英語のディベートの授業での対話です。この対話を読み,下の問い に答えなさい。 with Keiko that climate change is a serious problem, I think air travel is a much less damaging source of carbon pollution than, for example, burnimg MR. ROBERTS: Good morning, everybody. Today we have the first of our Coal. We should address these more serious causes first. Finally, the most student debates. The topic this morning is air travel, and the argument is. 法 important reason is the issue of freedom. People in a democracy expect the “Domestic air travel in Japan should be discouraged." Keiko will first argue right to travel as they wish. It has made our lives more convenient and in favor of the proposal and Junko will speak against. Over to you, Keiko. created more opportunities for everyone. We should not reduce our quality of life. Thank you for listening. KEIKO: Good morning, everybody. I am going to speak today in favor of the proposal. Limitless air travel inside Japan is a luxury that we can no longer MR. ROBERTS: Thank you to our two speakers. Now, are there any afford. The main reason is that it is extremely damaging to the questions from the audience? environment. The carbon gases produced by aircraft are very high and are a 頭人 proven cause of global warming. Therefore, we should try and reduce air 問1 次の(1)~(5)の文について, 本文の内容と一致するものには○.一致しないも travel as much as possible to protect the environment, not only for Japan but のには×を,それぞれ解答欄に記入しなさい。 also for the whole world. Secondly, air travel is actually unnecessary within the four islands of Japan. Now, while I appreciate that travel to Okinawa is (1) Keiko's main reason for opposing domestic air travel is the damage it a different case, there are efficient train services throughout Japan that are causes to the environment. h fast and environmentally friendly. These make an excellent alternative to air (2) Keiko thinks that air travel is cheap and efficient. flights, so there is really no need to use airplanes in most cases. Finally, (3) Keiko recommends that people travel between Okinawa and mainland there is an economic reason. Air travel is expensive for passengers because Japan by ship. the price of fuel keeps increasing, but airline companies are still struggling (4) Junko thinks that climate change is not an important problem. to make profits. Moreover, regional airports often cannot attract enough (5) Junko thinks that a lot of jobs will be lost if air travel is reduced. customers, and, overall, the industry is not cost-effective, It's time to admit that air travel is too damaging and expensive to be sustainable. Thank you. 問2 次の質問に英語で答えなさい。 Which of the two speakers do you more agree with? Give at least one JUNKO: Thank you, Keiko. I am going to disagree with the proposal for three reason for your answer. (解答欄:13.8cm×4行) reasons. Firstly, I think there is a strong economic case to support flying. Many jobs depend on air travel, not just the pilots and cabin staff, but also people who work in airports or for airlines, or who rely on fast transport.

Waiting for Answers Answers: 0
English Senior High

見辛かったらすみませんが、問2の英作文の添削をしていただきたいです🤲

2015年度 英語 13 They should not have to lose their livelihoods. Secondlv. although I agree 次の英文は、英語のディベートの授業での対話です。この対話を読み,下の問い に答えなさい。 with Keiko that climate change is a serious problem, I think air travel is a much less damaging source of carbon pollution than, for example, burnimg MR. ROBERTS: Good morning, everybody. Today we have the first of our Coal. We should address these more serious causes first. Finally, the most student debates. The topic this morning is air travel, and the argument is. 法 important reason is the issue of freedom. People in a democracy expect the “Domestic air travel in Japan should be discouraged." Keiko will first argue right to travel as they wish. It has made our lives more convenient and in favor of the proposal and Junko will speak against. Over to you, Keiko. created more opportunities for everyone. We should not reduce our quality of life. Thank you for listening. KEIKO: Good morning, everybody. I am going to speak today in favor of the proposal. Limitless air travel inside Japan is a luxury that we can no longer MR. ROBERTS: Thank you to our two speakers. Now, are there any afford. The main reason is that it is extremely damaging to the questions from the audience? environment. The carbon gases produced by aircraft are very high and are a 頭人 proven cause of global warming. Therefore, we should try and reduce air 問1 次の(1)~(5)の文について, 本文の内容と一致するものには○.一致しないも travel as much as possible to protect the environment, not only for Japan but のには×を,それぞれ解答欄に記入しなさい。 also for the whole world. Secondly, air travel is actually unnecessary within the four islands of Japan. Now, while I appreciate that travel to Okinawa is (1) Keiko's main reason for opposing domestic air travel is the damage it a different case, there are efficient train services throughout Japan that are causes to the environment. h fast and environmentally friendly. These make an excellent alternative to air (2) Keiko thinks that air travel is cheap and efficient. flights, so there is really no need to use airplanes in most cases. Finally, (3) Keiko recommends that people travel between Okinawa and mainland there is an economic reason. Air travel is expensive for passengers because Japan by ship. the price of fuel keeps increasing, but airline companies are still struggling (4) Junko thinks that climate change is not an important problem. to make profits. Moreover, regional airports often cannot attract enough (5) Junko thinks that a lot of jobs will be lost if air travel is reduced. customers, and, overall, the industry is not cost-effective, It's time to admit that air travel is too damaging and expensive to be sustainable. Thank you. 問2 次の質問に英語で答えなさい。 Which of the two speakers do you more agree with? Give at least one JUNKO: Thank you, Keiko. I am going to disagree with the proposal for three reason for your answer. (解答欄:13.8cm×4行) reasons. Firstly, I think there is a strong economic case to support flying. Many jobs depend on air travel, not just the pilots and cabin staff, but also people who work in airports or for airlines, or who rely on fast transport.

Waiting for Answers Answers: 0
English Senior High

1と3の答えはこれで合っていますか? また、2の答えがわかりません💦 教えていただけると助かります🙇‍♀️ よろしくお願いします!🙇‍♀️

B ある学校の英語部の活動で、インターナショナル·スポーツ·フェスティバルのボラン ティア募集をすることとなった。次の英文は、校内放送で募集を呼びかけることを計画した 生徒が書いた放送原稿である。この原稿に対する先生のコメントを読み,コメント中の空所 (1 )~ ( 3 ) にそれぞれ最も適当な英語を補え。 We need volunteers to help with International Sports Festival in Japan. No experience is necessary but energetic people who wish to help are best. Familiarity with English or other foreign languages are a plus. You must be at least 16 years of age and be possible to work 8 to 20 hours per week. If you are interested in helping, please don't forget coming to the volunteer meeting this Friday at 7 p.m. at the Main Campus Hall. Teacher: This script is wonderful! I hope a lot of students will apply for this project. But grammatically, you should change three points. Look at the underlined parts. In the first paragraph, the *subject in the third sentence is “familiarity," not “languages,” so the correct *verb form is “(1 )." In the sentence in the second paragraph, the subject is “You," a person, and in this case, you cannot use “possible.” Instead, “ ( 2)” should be used. In the sentence in the third paragraph, you used “don't forget coming,” but we use that to talk about the past. You should use “don't forget ( 3 ) ” instead because you are talking about the future.

Resolved Answers: 1