Grade

Subject

Type of questions

English Senior High

至急!!私立大学看護学部の過去問です。答えがないため、回答を作って欲しいです!!科目は英語です。

問題番号に対応 効とする。 うち受験票お researchers at the University of Veterinary Medicine in Vienna, Austria, have found. Dogs won't give food to a human, even if that person gave them some food first, and that they would help other dogs that had helped them before. Therefore, the team Previous studies have shown that dogs can recognize cooperative and uncooperative humans, "reciprocal altruism"- that is, doing a good thing in return to a human who had given expected to find that their test subjects would put these two things together and show To start, the team trained a group of 37 dogs to press a button which would activate a them food first. *enclosure with the dispenser, while one of (2) two humans was in a separate enclosure with the button. One would press the button to food dispenser. Then, they put each dog in an would not. Each dog was paired with both humans in give food to the dog, and (4) unhelpful one. turn. After that, the researchers switched over the button and the dispenser. They expected that the dogs would press the button to give food to the helpful human but not to the though the dogs did press the button, they did it just as often when either human had the food dispenser, and even when no human was there at all. "In these kinds of studies (5) [perform / to / dogs / which/ trained / are in a particular behavior for an experiment, they will usually do the behavior a few times as they have simply learned the association between the behavior and getting a reward, and it may be enjoyable for them to do the behavior," said Jim McGetrick, a PhD student at the University of Veterinary Medicine in Vienna who led the research. 身を正しく が本冊子 1番 2 次の英文を読んで下の設問に答えなさい。 (3) giving us some food? Are they a combination of reasons. "It is (6) Why wouldn't our best pals want to help us out by secretly all bad boys and girls? McGetrick believes there is possible that the dogs did not understand enough about the task to realize that only one of the humans was providing them with food," he said. It could also be because they didn't fully understand the button and dispenser system, or because they were too focused on the food to notice whether a particular human was pressing the button or not. "Having said all that, even if they did completely understand the task and were fully attentive to the actions of the humans, there is still a good possibility that they wouldn't have given food back in return," he added. "It could be that providing food to a dog as they do not typically do that in everyday life." After all, humans are the ones who human is something very strange for (7) already have food, from a dog's perspective. why would your pet need to worry about (8) making sure you have enough? However, all the humans in the study were people the dogs didn't know. "It is quite 5

Waiting for Answers Answers: 0
English Senior High

第二段落の1行目にhe would beがあるのですがwouldの後には何が省略されているのでしょうか。2段落目一文目の分構造を教えて頂きたいです。

intelligence, Some technology experts like Elon Musk, founder of the automobile company Tesla, warn that Al poses the greatest danger to the Many people worry about the rapid evolution of morality in artificial envisioned the need for rules that future robots need to abide by in his "Three survival of humankind. Renowned science fiction author Isaac Asimov founder of the AI development company GoodAI, has developed a virtual Laws of Robotics." However, rules alone will not be enough. Marek Rosa, school dedicated to teaching AI systems how to think, reason, and act ethically. "This does not mean pre-programming AI to follow a prescribed set of rules every situation," says Rosa. where we tell them what to do and what not to do in 応用 "Rather, the idea is to train them to apply their knowledge to situations they've never previously encountered." E Rosa views AI as he would an infant, a blank slate on which to imprint basic values. As the child grows into adulthood, these values will be the basis on before. Al programs acquire values and a sense of ethics through a c which the child can determine how to deal with situations never experienced mentor. The complexity of moral tasks increases step by step over time. Rosa gives the example of introducing children to traffic, saying that parents do not let children wander onto the road at first. "In the same way, we expose the Alto increasingly complex environments where it can build upon previously learned m." knowledge and receive feedback from our team. Dindl hos Als read thousands of

Resolved Answers: 1
English Senior High

所々分からない部分があるので教えて欲しいです よろしくお願いします🙏

Work Complete the sentences below to match the Japanese. If everyone ( ) best-before dates properly, we ( waste. ) all children ( I( 1. 誰もが賞味期限を正しく理解していれば、フードロスをいくらか防ぐことができるのに。 2. すべての子どもたちに食物の安全な取り扱いについて学ぶ機会があればなあ。 3. 水問題についてまるで他人事のように話すべきではない。 4. この最新のオーブンレンジがなければ、より多くのフードロスが生じるでしょう。 We should not talk about water issues ( business. ) ( ) ( ) not ( there would be more food waste. ) a chance to learn about safe food handling. ) prevent some food 3.〈状況〉水問題について議論するハルトの様子を描写します。[be] Haruto is discussing water issues as if he ) they were none of our B Complete the sentences below using the verbs in the brackets. 1. <状況> もし自分がお金持ちならどんなことをするかを述べます。 [be, donate] If I rich, I 2.〈状況〉フードロスを減らすためにできるとよいことを述べます。 [plan, avoid] I wish everyone _unog srij their meals and 4. 〈状況〉もしその村に井戸がなかったら,と考えます。 [be, have If it for the well, villagers ) this latest microwave oven, to fight against food waste. impulse buying. an expert. access to drinking water.

Unresolved Answers: 1
English Senior High

赤で囲った部分 noneとかbothとかが代名詞で使われるイメージがないのですが 具体的にはどういう感じでしょうか

整理して覚える | 039 否定には, すべてを否定する 「全否定」 と, 一部を否定する 「部分否定」という表現がある。 否定するものが2つ [2人] の場合と3つ [3人] 以上の場合ではそれぞれ表現が異なる。 Shishoqata 3つ [3人] not ... any 以上 2つ [2人] not ... either (+単数名詞) = neither (+単数名詞) 「どちら (の〈名詞>) も···ない」 .. 代名詞・形容詞を用いた全否定と部分否定の表現 「すべて [どれも] ・・・ない」 eee not any +名詞 = no +名詞 「すべての 〈名詞〉が[どの〈名詞> も] ではない」 「・・・ない」 none (of A ) 「(AD) 何一つ・・・ない / (A の) だれ 一人・・・ない」 部分否定 not .... both (+複数名詞) 「どちら (の〈名詞>) も・・・というわけ ではない」 not ... all (+1) not every +単数名詞 「すべて(の〈名詞) が…というわけ either, neither, both, any, all は代名詞としても形容詞としても用いられるが, no と every は形容詞としてだけ用いられることに注意。 は「2色のど 否定は <not./ ●全否定3つ [3人]以上の場合 「すべてのペットの持ち込みを許可していない」という3つ以上のすべてを否定する全 否定なので,〈not … any + 名詞〉 と 〈no + 名詞> で文意を完成させる。 min before ●部分否定一3つ [3人] 以上の場合 「誰もが・・・ するわけではない」から、部分否定の③ Not all か④ Not everyone が正解 になる。 述語動詞が wants なので三人称単数の ④ Not everyone が正解。 every ... 「すべての・・・」は全体を構成するひとつひとつに注目する表現で, every のあとに C は単数名詞が続き、さらに 〈every +単数名詞〉 は単数扱いとなる。 everyone, everything も同様に単数扱いとなる。 733 ③ Not all は複数扱いになるので, Not all (people) want to go ... となる。 F ●全否定 2つ [2人] の場合 ではない」という両方を否定する全否定。2つの場合の 名詞) > か〈neither (+名詞)〉なので.④either が正解。

Unresolved Answers: 1
English Senior High

3はこれでもおっけーですか?答えにwhenを使って書いてあったんですけど、、、 9はmadeを使ってはだめですか?

Standard 次の文を太字部分に注意して英語に直しなさい . 1. あの道を行けば町に出ますよ. That road will takes you to the town. 2. 何で戻って来たんだい? Why did you come back ? ? □□ 3. その話を聞いて私は悲しくなりました。 I became sad to hear the stor story. of his speech 6. 昨日は雨でどこへも出かけられなかった. Rainy prevented me from going anywhend The rain □□ 7. この検査で彼の血液型 *がわかった. 4. 彼は給料がよいので楽な暮らしをすることができる. His large income enables me to live in comfort. 5. それで彼の演説を思い出したよ. It reminds me That INDO □□ 10. コンピュータでやれば多くの時間と手間がかからなくてすむ. (Computers) The story made me sad Inusteno This medicine will help your 1. 無生物主語 es tenday The sudden disease made me to Cancel the thip. nudis ahirt This test showed his blood type 8. 温度計は18℃ * を指している. The thermometer says eighteen degrees Centigrade reads 9. 急病のため、僕はその旅行を取りやめにした * . ➡69 The computer will save you alot of time and thouble. us.me for gaibrooo A □□ 11. 頭痛にはこの薬が効くでしょう. headache 8 ➡10 ➡12

Resolved Answers: 1