この問題の答えは①なのですが、③が不正解になる理由を教えてください。

] 16. Ireceived an email from a fiend ( 。 ) since our elementary school days. 可004叶0 の⑦Tve known ② Tve been knowing ③ who has known ④ who've been knowing (南山

ネクステ使ってる方いますか？？ 使い方教えて欲しいです！！😭

仮定法で、wouldを使う時と使わない時の違いが分かりません。

仮定法の単元です。 この文の｢would have given｣は過去形になっているのか、過去完了になっているのか、分からないので教えていただきたいです。

e An honeSt person would have given the wallet to the police. (正直な人なら. その財布を警察に届けただろう) ゅ主語が(仮定) の意味を含む。

総合英語 Be 3rdEdition という文法解説書が手元にあるのですが、この解説書の英文法の網羅性はどの程度のものなのでしょうか。 センター試験程度か、それとも難関大入試にも通用するほどの網羅性があるのか。この解説書の網羅性についてご教示頂ければ幸いです。

に Eo ec AP た |さて 敵 4 li

英文を読むことができなく、単語とかを勉強しても、英文が読めません。 勉強の仕方が悪いです。 どのように勉強したら、英文を読めるようになるか教えてください。

どちらの問題も答えは②なのですがどうして主格関係代名詞が省略するのかがわかりません。 教えていただきたいです。よろしくお願いします。

we of those qualities ( ) are typical of Americans in general were the result ot e frontier life. otogd wod vow ① that we think about ③ who we think な のか are many surprising things ( for which h 3 for wi appen ANる ③ what happen っ99d

丸は気にしないでください(><) 答え教えていただけると嬉しいです😭

間 JH OUT culture, where the use ot dictionaries 1S WideSDread。many people may have the impression that a word's meaning is simply its dictionary definition.A little thought should show however, that there must be more to meaning than this. It is true that when someone wants to find out what き Word means, an easy and practical way to do it is to look the word up ina dicionary. Most people in our caltare accept dictionaries as providing unauestionably authoritative accounts of the meanings of the words they define. [2] Thenoleof dictionaries/ in our society as authorities on meaning 1eads many people to feel that the dicionary dehnition of a word more accurately represents the word's meaning than does an individual speaker's nderstanding of the word. Keep in mind/ however。 that the people who write dictionaries arrive at their definitions by studying the ways speakers of the language use different words. Some dictionaries are relatively prescriptive\、 others more descriptive* but all must face the fact that a word means what people use it to mean。 There simply is no higher authority than the general community of native speakers of the language. This is obyiously the position one must take in descriptive analysis、 but even in prescriptive grammar, words cannot be given strange defimitions that dont correspond to actual uses of those words by the speech community. A word's meaning is determined by the people who use that word, not by a dictionary- [3] The iqea that a dictionary definition is all there is to a word's meaning runs into even more serious problems when one considers that im order to understand the dictionary definition of a word, one must know the meanings of the words used in that definition: For example. 下 the word ecfo7xere is defined as 'a blastomere that develops into ectoderm'、one must ee he 0 Me 0 Pd Side

パソコンからの画像で見にくくてすいません。 新しい学年の課題で習っておらず、【3】が分からないので教えて頂けると嬉しいです。

| は3】 以のそれぞれの基文に訓りがータ所 (一語) あります。 該当する部分に下線を引き、 2 正い馬名を記入しなさい [GRAMMAR (各?点、 合計13点) Do you know whattime the classicel coneert stan9. Wet do yo suppose wl win the Nobel Pdlze for Physics?. Ron ed am hismoney atole INUondom Locatimg on a quiet street, the hotelloffers comfortable rooms, Hing mever nied rmW fh ENly didNtwant to eat SNghNi| やビ

英語表現の分野で英文法を理解出来るようになる勉強法って何かありますか？また日常的にやれることってなんですか？