Biology Undergraduate over 2 yearsago

至急🚨 この仕組みについて教えてください。 また、この電子オーバーフローモデルは時代遅れと思われるって書いているのですが、本当ですか？

(A) Electron overflow model (considered out-of-date) Alt UQ pool Cyt No alternative pathway activity Cytochrome pathway unsaturated Alternative pathway active Alt Cyt Cytochrome pathway saturated

Biology Undergraduate over 2 yearsago

至急お願いいたします🚨 生物の質問です。 ミトコンドリアの経路についての説明だと思うのですが、電子オーバーフローモデルと電子分布モデルの違いを教えていただきたいです。 また、どういう仕組みなのか、何故このように電子が流れるのかも教えていただきたいです。 UQ poolはユ... Read More

(A) Electron overflow model (considered out-of-date) Alt UQ pool Alternative oxidase inactive. Alt No alternative pathway activity Cytochrome pathway unsaturated Cyt (B) Electron distribution model (reflects current thinking) UQ pool Cyt Alternative pathway active Cytochrome pathway saturated Alt Alternative oxidase active Alt UQ pool Cyt Cyt Figure 14.33 Two models for regulation of electron flow through the alternative oxidase. (A) In the electron overflow model, no appreciable electron transfer through the alternative pathway takes place until electron flow through the cytochrome pathway is at or near satu- ration. This could result from the effects of respirato- ry control, if the rate of mitochondrial ATP produc- tion exceeds its rate of utilization in the cytosol, or from some externally imposed stress, such as low temperature. Under such circumstances, the UQ pool becomes sufficiently reduced to allow electrons to flow through the alternative oxidase, the latter re- quiring that the UQ pool be 40% to 60% reduced to attain significant activity. (B) In the electron distribu- tion model, the alternative and cytochrome path- ways both show significant activity at low levels of UQ pool reduction, and electrons are distributed be- tween the two pathways on the basis of the relative activities of each pathway. The activity of the alter- native oxidase under these circumstances is thought to be regulated by the action of a-keto acids and by reduction/oxidation of the intermolecular disulfide bond, as well as by additional regulatory mecha- nisms not yet characterized.

TOEIC・English Undergraduate about 7 yearsago

訳して欲しいです至急ですお願いします🙏

s not something you Want 9 eir horme5・ It* 8 。 tak eople out of th 村 K you are ga ing 1 other than definitely needing to 9" 叶 dose 』 do lightIy , for 「@d rter to taKe shelter・ 1f is a plum, radiation・ Tn S0TTe accldents, IE 15 DTP indows 2 d or puf人 relea5e, people shelter In hou5e5 witl nt いい rhead2/" 58yS・ the puff has passed overheady Milligan 58Y : NeceSsarY changeS? In Japan, even the wake of the deadIy earthquake and ME d i ins25 We left local infrastructure ruin5, thousands of people た 抽 ta from the vicinity of the nuclear POWeT plant within 24 hourS・ MM 3 Milligan, dt least, does not anticipate anY chan9ges to the「Uu e5 ー し from27 less0nS learned from Fukushimaa ro nuclear DOWe「 plants stemmin9 now Provide adequate? ion for public| ww e Can See i ゞThe planning ZOneS in place There IS nothing W cate that We would need to expand、 zio る le health and safety,′ She SayS・ Fukushima meltdowns that would indi the_.plume eXxDOSU「 pathway“" an aircra介 mi ar USS Ronald Rea9 gase5?1 On ah dioactIVe noble e aircraft carrier found ほぼ: s for civilianS, after miles from the plant| e case of Fukushirma, the carrier? sailed into the plume of escaping「す March 12. More than 100 miles aWay, sailors on th jevels high enough to exceed the EPA'Sデ guideline zo roughly 10 hours of exposure. "They went up to 130 and we were St reading a direct gamma shine33 of 0.6 milirem pe 因 nour” explained the NRCS Stephen Trautman on March 12, according t9 s34. Garmma「ayS d「e among the most energetic 一 and tnerefore forms of radiation. Nevertheless, in th transcript dangerous tO health 一 2。 Tn the end, the question i5 One of risk. No one has died from radioactiwe contamination as a result of the Fukushima meltdowns, at least not yeW And it may prove impossible to disentangle3* any extra cancers due 0 Fukushima S radiation, from those that happen as a result of all the othW carcinogenic37 factors a DerSOn is exposed to in the modern world froW diet to smoke. But it remai i jns unclear how far radioactive emissions3 might reach In WW Case of a another 0 央0 1 Fukushima. "At that point its from We ? Another five miles? Another 10 miles? Do you 8 a Sense?” ask 1] Sked NRC chairman Gregory Jaczko on March 12, as he t his staff anal yzed computer modeling of a catastrophic meltdown す