(ウ)の真ん中にあるdeepは何詞ですか？

しIIIS etweer it impossible for most primates to speak or laugh. onblido ett (ウ) This difference has its roots going back millions of years, deep in the story of human evolution. (エ) When humans began walking upright, it freed the upper bòdy from *weight- 11 11 ++on he0eth eontrol

答えは③なんですけど、whether A or Bの構文が or じゃなくてandになってるんですか？

) crying and laughing are unique to human beings. の when 3. It is doubtful ( の what 2 which 3 whether (※センター試 4. This food tastes terrible! I couldn't eat it ( )I were starving. (センター試

personとhumanは何が違うのでしょうか？

humanとPeopleは何が違うんですか？

1パラ最後・解釈お願いしたいです！ let alone〜moralityまでSVOが振れません… let aloneは前置詞的な役割、と辞書にあったのですが、実際はなにものですか？

fone great confusion.” (A sympathetic 次の英又 っともよく合致するものを、各イ~二から D Babies seem unable to control their actions/Of to focus their attention) In 12. 1og famously described a baby's mental life as Bノ2 4 parent might see a sign of consdiousness in a baby's large eyes ahd eagerly accen the popular claim that babies are wonderful learners, btut it is hard to avoid the 0 2 せイ e impression/ had they_ are lignorant. Many psychologists will tell you that/ the 21ignorance of human bábies )extends well into childhood. [For many years the conventional view was that young humans take a surprisingly long time to learn basic facts about the physical world (for example, that objects continue to exist (once they are out of sight) And basic facts about people (for example, that they have beliefs ahd desires and goals) let alone how long it takes them to learn about れもなく morality, 2DI am admittedly biased, but I think pne of the great discoveries in modern

この長文がどんな話なのか理解できません😥 出来れば段落ごとに要約して頂けると助かります😔 よろしくお願いします!!!!!!!!!🙇🏽‍♀️🙇🏽‍♀️

We are,(to a remarkable degree, the right distance from the right sort of star, one e 5 of ten billion and we wouldn't be here now./ We are also fortunate to orbit where we that is big enough to radiate lots of energy, but not so big as to burn itself out swiftly t 1s a curiosity bf physics that the larger a stor the more rapidly it burns. Had our sun Ocen ten times as massive、it would have evhonsted itself after ten million years instead of do. 1o0 much nearer and evervthing on Farth would have boiled away. Much rarther away and everything would have frozen. の14 m 1978, an astrophysicist named Micheel Hart made some calculations and Concluded that Earth would have been uninhabitable had it been just 1 percent rartner That's not much, and in fact it wasn't enough. percent 10 from or 5.percent closer to the Sun. The figures have since been refined and made a little more generous 5 nearer and I5 percent farther are thought to be more accurate assessments 1oI om zone of habitability - but that is still a narrow belt. To appreciate just how narrow, you have only to look at Venus. Venus 1s only ©10 15 twenty-five million miles closer to the Sun than we are. The Sun's warmth reaches it just two minutes before it touches us. In size and composition, Venus is very like Earth, but the small difference in orbital distance made all the difference to (3)how it turned out. It appears that during the early years of the solar system Venus was only slightly warmer than Earth and probably had oceans. But those few degrees of extra 20 warmth meant that Venus could not hold on to its surface water, with disastrous consequences for its climate. As its water evaporated, the hydrogen atoms escaped into space, and the oxygen atoms combined with carbon to form a dense atmosphere of the greenhouse gas CO2. Venus became stifling. Although people of my age will recall a time when astrononmers hoped that Venus might harbor life beneath its padded 25 clouds, possibly even a kind of tropical vegetation, we now know that it is much too fierce an environment for any kind of life that we can reasonably conceive of. Its surface temperature is a roasting 470 degrees centigrade (roughly 900 degrees Fahrenheit), which is hot enough to melt lead, and the atmospheric pressure at the surface is ninety times that of Earth, or more than any human body could withstand We lack the technology to make suits or even spaceships that would allow us to visit Our knowledge of Venus's surface is based on distant radar imagery and som。 disturbing noise from an unmanned Soviet probe that was dropped hopefully into the

この話の内容がいまいち理解できません😔 どなたか詳しく教えて頂けると助かります!!!!!!!!!💧 宜しくお願いします!!!!!!!🙇🏽‍♀️🙇🏽‍♀️

0 The English language is full of words which have changed their meanings 3lightly or even dranmatically over the centuries. Changes of meaning can be of a number of I (of の用法)【nice の意味の変遷) different types. Some words, such as nice, have changed gradually. Emotive words tend 例示1企 今例示2 2(文構造) to change more rapidly by losing some of their force, so that awful, which originally とzthe meant ‘inspiring awe', now means Very bad’ or, in expressions such as awfully good, い 5 simply something like *very. In any case, all connection with ‘awe' has been lost. 2 Some changes of meaning, though, seem to attract more attention than others. (0This is perhaps particularly the case where the people who worry about such things 3 (the case where 】 【文構造】 believe that a distinction is being lost. For example, there is a lot of concern at the moment about the words uninterested and disinterested. In modern English, the positive 10 form interested has two different meanings. The first and older meaning is approximately 今説明 4 las の用法) 'having a personal involvement in', as in otniab neit The second and later, but now much more common, meaning is ‘demonstrating or He is an interested party in the dispute. pd cooig 不説明 1s experiencing curiosity in, enthusiasm for, concern for, as in 和 He is very interested in cricket. (2)It is not a problem that this word has more than one meaning. Confusion never 小理由 seems to occur, largely because the context will normally make it obvious which meaning is intended. In all human languages there are very many words which have more than one meaning- this is a very common and entirely normal (3)state of affairs. Most 20 English speakers, for example, can instantly think of a number of different meanings for the words common and state and affairs which I have just used.

①人間と同じように残酷なこともある。 ②しかし彼らはとても親切で、愛情深くもある。 ③チンパンジーは実に愛情深く、思いやりがあることがある。 と訳されるのですが、青い線のcanはなぜ使われているのか分かりません🥲 どういう意味で使われているか教えて欲しいです！

Kenji: What about their character I mean, are Ihey friendly? Are they cruel? * Jane: They are usually friendly with each other, but they can be cruel, just like humans. Kenji: Really? Jane: The males patrol their territories, sometimes attacking chimps from another community. 2Hut theycan be very kind and loving o0. Once, when he was about three yours old, a chimp(called Mel lost his mother and was left alone. We V2 Glad to see you! all thought hed die. But, to our "would:だうう urprise, a 12-year-old male chimp (lled Spindle took care of him. Kenji: In what way? In what way? = How? He let Mel ride on his back and share his Jane * hont at night. I often (saw him sharing his food if Melasked for it, Chimpanzees can indeed be loving 3 TF hnd earing. male Iméll patrol (patróul] territory [tératò:ril tharacter Ikitoktar| cruel |krú:ol community|komjú:natil loVing ||Aviyl Mel [méll Spindle Ispindl

peopleとhumanの違いを教えてください

なぜdifferにsがついているのですか？ 前がA and Bになっているのでdifferじゃないかと思ったんですが…

2 G-1 Kenji: You did a lot of fieldwork, observing chimpanzees in the wild. Are they in any way like human beings? ュ Jane: Chimpanzees and humans have a lot in ユ common. We know today that the DNA of humans and chimps differs by justa little over one percent. Their brains are very much like ours and much of their behavior is like ours. Like us, they also have much to learn in their childhood. The members of a chimp family are very close, often helping one another. They can feel sad, happy, afraid, and angry.