学年

質問の種類

英語 高校生

九大2020年度英作文です。 どなたか添削して頂けないでしょうか🙇‍♀️🙇‍♀️

g 3), of d to sinion. nerican ments. ing and writing, orms than 九州大理系前期 〔4〕 次の英文の説明と指示に従い,英語の文章を書きなさい。(30点) Lew Most Japanese high school students have to choose their course of study either from humanities ("bunkei") or science ("rikei") in the middle of their high school education. One of the reasons is to help students prepare for university entrance examinations and reduce their burden of subjects studied. At the same time, this narrows the range of choices for their future careers at Chebet a very early stage. Write your opinion on this current practice in a well-organized paragraph. It should be approximately 100 English words long, including specific reasons to support your argument. 〔5〕 次の文章の下線部(1), (2)を英語に訳しなさい。 ( 27点) 2020年度 英語 15 Okue 250 (E) 220 インターネットと検索エンジンのおかげで,あるトピックに関してどんな論文 がすでに発表されているのかを調べるのは、格段に簡単になった。 そこで何を 始めるにもまずは既存研究を調べましょう, となるのだが、下手をするとすぐに 「こんなにたくさんの研究がされている。 自分たちに出る幕などありません」 とい あんたん う暗澹たる気分になってしまう。 (1) 研究で楽しいのはなんと言っても問題について自分で考え、解決に向けて自分 で試行錯誤する時間, そして何かが解決できた瞬間である。 そこで,あまり真面 目に既存研究調査などせずにそれを始めた場合どうなるか? おそらく多くの場 合、苦労をして考えついたアイデアや作り上げたソフトウェアに似た先行研究が あるということを後から思い知ることになるのだろう。だがそれは、無駄な時間 だったのだろうか? (2) 一人の人間が情報を消費することに一生を費やしても、決して吸収しきれない 情報があふれている。 徹底調査をし、ひたすら再発明をしないことに向けて最適 化すべきなのか, それとも, 再発明の危険があってもまずは自分で脳を全開にす ること,それ自身を目的関数にしてよいのか? 真面目に考えてもよい時になって いる気がする。 田浦健次朗 「車輪の再発明と研究者の幸せ」

解決済み 回答数: 1
英語 高校生

至急!!私立大学看護学部の過去問です。答えがないため、回答を作って欲しいです!!科目は英語です。

問題番号に対応 効とする。 うち受験票お researchers at the University of Veterinary Medicine in Vienna, Austria, have found. Dogs won't give food to a human, even if that person gave them some food first, and that they would help other dogs that had helped them before. Therefore, the team Previous studies have shown that dogs can recognize cooperative and uncooperative humans, "reciprocal altruism"- that is, doing a good thing in return to a human who had given expected to find that their test subjects would put these two things together and show To start, the team trained a group of 37 dogs to press a button which would activate a them food first. *enclosure with the dispenser, while one of (2) two humans was in a separate enclosure with the button. One would press the button to food dispenser. Then, they put each dog in an would not. Each dog was paired with both humans in give food to the dog, and (4) unhelpful one. turn. After that, the researchers switched over the button and the dispenser. They expected that the dogs would press the button to give food to the helpful human but not to the though the dogs did press the button, they did it just as often when either human had the food dispenser, and even when no human was there at all. "In these kinds of studies (5) [perform / to / dogs / which/ trained / are in a particular behavior for an experiment, they will usually do the behavior a few times as they have simply learned the association between the behavior and getting a reward, and it may be enjoyable for them to do the behavior," said Jim McGetrick, a PhD student at the University of Veterinary Medicine in Vienna who led the research. 身を正しく が本冊子 1番 2 次の英文を読んで下の設問に答えなさい。 (3) giving us some food? Are they a combination of reasons. "It is (6) Why wouldn't our best pals want to help us out by secretly all bad boys and girls? McGetrick believes there is possible that the dogs did not understand enough about the task to realize that only one of the humans was providing them with food," he said. It could also be because they didn't fully understand the button and dispenser system, or because they were too focused on the food to notice whether a particular human was pressing the button or not. "Having said all that, even if they did completely understand the task and were fully attentive to the actions of the humans, there is still a good possibility that they wouldn't have given food back in return," he added. "It could be that providing food to a dog as they do not typically do that in everyday life." After all, humans are the ones who human is something very strange for (7) already have food, from a dog's perspective. why would your pet need to worry about (8) making sure you have enough? However, all the humans in the study were people the dogs didn't know. "It is quite 5

回答募集中 回答数: 0
英語 高校生

至急!!私立大学看護学部の過去問です。答えがないため、回答を作って欲しいです!!科目は英語です。

プペンシルで解 people than ever can find an audience time filled with disasters, online, "conspiracy theories seem to be growing crazier by the day. We also tend to believe in such things under increased stress, which is unfortunate because many of these ideas are Some conspiracy theorists pride themselves on being "critical freethinkers," but a new damaging our democracies and ourselves. study showing a connection between lower critical thinking skills and increased conspiracy (2) theory belief suggests this may not be the case. "Conspiracy theories refer to attempts to explain the ultimate cause of an important event (social, political, climatic, etc.) by accusing a hidden group of perceived evil, powerful people or organizations of having secretly planned and carried out these events," say Paris Nanterre University psychologist Anthony Lantian and team in their paper. two studies, the researchers tested the critical thinking skills of 338 a French version of the Ennis-Weir Critical Thinking Essay Test. They then scored the students' tendencies towards conspiracy beliefs and their personal Across undergraduate students (4) the objective analysis and assessment of their own critical thinking skills. Critical thinking. evaluation of a situation requires a collection of cognitive skills. These include the ability to distinguish between relevant versus irrelevant information, think systematically, see other perspectives, recognize and avoid logical *fallacies, look beyond the obvious, be aware of and avoid biases, and change your mind in light of new evidence. "The more people believe in conspiracy theories, the worse they perform on a critical thinking ability test," Lantian said. "This test is characterized by an *open-ended format highlighting several areas of critical thinking ability in the context of argumentation." (6) All this is not to say that those with high critical thinking skills can't also be sucked into believing things that may not necessarily be true. The way (7) [is wired /a/ makes / thinking/ social species / our / as] us very vulnerable to believing those we identify with as part of our own cultural group- no matter how much education we have had that boosts science literacy. Trust plays a massive role in who we believe. We also have a tendency to believe each of us is above average at detecting misinformation, which can't possibly be true. Researchers have also linked this need to feel special to greater belief in conspiracies. Lantian and team point out that while their study suggests critical thinking lowers Deople's chances of believing in untrue conspiracy theories, the findings don't determine if (8) (9) た場合,そ 数学【数学 験番号 【化学 b てお 3 In a more (1) ① 次の英文を読んで、下の設問に答えなさい。 1 - (3) the po no a E

回答募集中 回答数: 0
英語 高校生

(5)についてeat the foodsではダメですか?

erdeen me we w break ma 東京医科歯科大 One reason may be breakfast's nutritional value-partly because cereal is Tarified with vitamins. In one study on the breakfast babits of 1.600 young people Julete, vitamin C, iron and calcium, was better in those who had breakfast in the U, researchers found that the fire and micronutrient intale, including of regularly. There have been sämiäer finelings in Australia, Brazil, Canada and the Breakfast is also associated with improved brain function, including concentration and language. A review of 54 studies found that eating breakfast can improve memory, though the effects on other brain functions were inconclusive. However, one of the review's researchers, Mary Beth Spitznagel says there is "reasonable" evidence breakfast does improve concentration-there just needs to be more research. "Looking at studies that tested concentration, the number of studies showing a benefit was exactly the same as the number that found no benefit," she says. "And no studies found that eating breakfast was bad for concentration." What's most important, some argue, is what we eat for breakfast. High-protein breakfasts have been found particularly effective in reducing food fravings and consumption later in the day, according to research by the Australian Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation. While cereal remains a firm favourite among breakfast consumers in the UK and US, a recent Which? investigation into the sugar content of 'adult' breakfast cereals found that some cereals contain more than three quarters of the recommended daily amount of free sugars in each portion, and sugar was the second or third highest ingredient in seven out of 10 flaked cereals. 5)PV But some research suggests if we're going to eat sugary foods, it's best to do it early. One study found that changing levels of the appetite hormone leptin in the body throughout the day coincide with having our lowest threshold for sweet food in the morning, while scientists from Tel Aviv University have found that hunger is best regulated in the morning. They recruited 200 obese adults to take part in a 16-week-long diet, where half added dessert to their breakfast, and half didn't. Those who added dessert lost an average of 40 lbs (18 kg) more-however, the study was unable to show the long-term effects.

未解決 回答数: 1
英語 高校生

添削をお願いしたいです!(画像が送りきれないので回答者の方が返信したら追加で送ります) 自分の解答↓ 短い時間、レンジで加熱すると心臓病のリスクを下げるフラボノイドを増加させることができるが、長い時間加熱したり多すぎる水の中で加熱するとむしろフラボノイドは低下してしまう。た... 続きを読む

一般に,電子レンジでの調理は,他の調理法に比べると栄養素 16 の保持には好ましいとされるが,調理時間が長かったり、多量の 水を使って調理したりするとブロッコリーでは心疾患のリスクを減らす フラボノイド類が減少するという報告がある。 ただ、食材によって栄養保 持の結果はさまざまであり,統一見解はない。電子レンジ調理にプラスチ ック容器を使うと, 可塑剤のフタラートなどの化学物質が溶け出すが, こうした物質は微量であってもホルモンや代謝系を乱すほか、 生殖問題や ぜんそく, ADHD との関連性など,さまざまな悪影響を及ぼすことが指 摘されている。また, 高温になる電子レンジでの加熱で分子の結合が変わ り,新たな高エネルギーの分子が作り出される。 これがDNA と反応し て突然変異を引き起こすとされており, ジャガイモを電子レンジ加熱した ことで,発がん物質として働くアクリルアミドが生成した例が報告されて いる。(400字以内)発 当 解答編

回答募集中 回答数: 0