学年

質問の種類

英語 高校生

見辛かったらすみませんが、問2の英作文の添削をしていただきたいです🤲

2015年度 英語 13 They should not have to lose their livelihoods. Secondlv. although I agree 次の英文は、英語のディベートの授業での対話です。この対話を読み,下の問い に答えなさい。 with Keiko that climate change is a serious problem, I think air travel is a much less damaging source of carbon pollution than, for example, burnimg MR. ROBERTS: Good morning, everybody. Today we have the first of our Coal. We should address these more serious causes first. Finally, the most student debates. The topic this morning is air travel, and the argument is. 法 important reason is the issue of freedom. People in a democracy expect the “Domestic air travel in Japan should be discouraged." Keiko will first argue right to travel as they wish. It has made our lives more convenient and in favor of the proposal and Junko will speak against. Over to you, Keiko. created more opportunities for everyone. We should not reduce our quality of life. Thank you for listening. KEIKO: Good morning, everybody. I am going to speak today in favor of the proposal. Limitless air travel inside Japan is a luxury that we can no longer MR. ROBERTS: Thank you to our two speakers. Now, are there any afford. The main reason is that it is extremely damaging to the questions from the audience? environment. The carbon gases produced by aircraft are very high and are a 頭人 proven cause of global warming. Therefore, we should try and reduce air 問1 次の(1)~(5)の文について, 本文の内容と一致するものには○.一致しないも travel as much as possible to protect the environment, not only for Japan but のには×を,それぞれ解答欄に記入しなさい。 also for the whole world. Secondly, air travel is actually unnecessary within the four islands of Japan. Now, while I appreciate that travel to Okinawa is (1) Keiko's main reason for opposing domestic air travel is the damage it a different case, there are efficient train services throughout Japan that are causes to the environment. h fast and environmentally friendly. These make an excellent alternative to air (2) Keiko thinks that air travel is cheap and efficient. flights, so there is really no need to use airplanes in most cases. Finally, (3) Keiko recommends that people travel between Okinawa and mainland there is an economic reason. Air travel is expensive for passengers because Japan by ship. the price of fuel keeps increasing, but airline companies are still struggling (4) Junko thinks that climate change is not an important problem. to make profits. Moreover, regional airports often cannot attract enough (5) Junko thinks that a lot of jobs will be lost if air travel is reduced. customers, and, overall, the industry is not cost-effective, It's time to admit that air travel is too damaging and expensive to be sustainable. Thank you. 問2 次の質問に英語で答えなさい。 Which of the two speakers do you more agree with? Give at least one JUNKO: Thank you, Keiko. I am going to disagree with the proposal for three reason for your answer. (解答欄:13.8cm×4行) reasons. Firstly, I think there is a strong economic case to support flying. Many jobs depend on air travel, not just the pilots and cabin staff, but also people who work in airports or for airlines, or who rely on fast transport.

回答募集中 回答数: 0
英語 高校生

見辛かったらすみませんが、問2の英作文の添削をしていただきたいです🤲

2015年度 英語 13 They should not have to lose their livelihoods. Secondlv. although I agree 次の英文は、英語のディベートの授業での対話です。この対話を読み,下の問い に答えなさい。 with Keiko that climate change is a serious problem, I think air travel is a much less damaging source of carbon pollution than, for example, burnimg MR. ROBERTS: Good morning, everybody. Today we have the first of our Coal. We should address these more serious causes first. Finally, the most student debates. The topic this morning is air travel, and the argument is. 法 important reason is the issue of freedom. People in a democracy expect the “Domestic air travel in Japan should be discouraged." Keiko will first argue right to travel as they wish. It has made our lives more convenient and in favor of the proposal and Junko will speak against. Over to you, Keiko. created more opportunities for everyone. We should not reduce our quality of life. Thank you for listening. KEIKO: Good morning, everybody. I am going to speak today in favor of the proposal. Limitless air travel inside Japan is a luxury that we can no longer MR. ROBERTS: Thank you to our two speakers. Now, are there any afford. The main reason is that it is extremely damaging to the questions from the audience? environment. The carbon gases produced by aircraft are very high and are a 頭人 proven cause of global warming. Therefore, we should try and reduce air 問1 次の(1)~(5)の文について, 本文の内容と一致するものには○.一致しないも travel as much as possible to protect the environment, not only for Japan but のには×を,それぞれ解答欄に記入しなさい。 also for the whole world. Secondly, air travel is actually unnecessary within the four islands of Japan. Now, while I appreciate that travel to Okinawa is (1) Keiko's main reason for opposing domestic air travel is the damage it a different case, there are efficient train services throughout Japan that are causes to the environment. h fast and environmentally friendly. These make an excellent alternative to air (2) Keiko thinks that air travel is cheap and efficient. flights, so there is really no need to use airplanes in most cases. Finally, (3) Keiko recommends that people travel between Okinawa and mainland there is an economic reason. Air travel is expensive for passengers because Japan by ship. the price of fuel keeps increasing, but airline companies are still struggling (4) Junko thinks that climate change is not an important problem. to make profits. Moreover, regional airports often cannot attract enough (5) Junko thinks that a lot of jobs will be lost if air travel is reduced. customers, and, overall, the industry is not cost-effective, It's time to admit that air travel is too damaging and expensive to be sustainable. Thank you. 問2 次の質問に英語で答えなさい。 Which of the two speakers do you more agree with? Give at least one JUNKO: Thank you, Keiko. I am going to disagree with the proposal for three reason for your answer. (解答欄:13.8cm×4行) reasons. Firstly, I think there is a strong economic case to support flying. Many jobs depend on air travel, not just the pilots and cabin staff, but also people who work in airports or for airlines, or who rely on fast transport.

回答募集中 回答数: 0
英語 高校生

こちらを解いてくださると嬉しいです!

ロ10 Iwas busy with my homework last night. I didn't have time to eat supper, ロロ 13 Kevin: What's the legal driving age in your country? 学習日 ) watch TV. #17回 2 but for 3 except for 修飾に関する問題⑥ 月 D as to の let alone 第 日 2別冊解答 p.100~105 (名城大) ) with their success. 3 pleased 2 be pleasing O be pleased の pleasing (近畿大) 1 選択 完成 問題 空所に入るもっとも適切な語(句)を選びなさい。 )joking, what do you mean to do? ロロ 12 Apart ( Din 2 behind 3 from )ariving at the scene of the crime, the police discovered。 o の With の for (大阪商業大) 1( suspect had already gone. 0 As )内の語句を正しく並べ替えなさい。 2 At 3 On (学習院大) 2 L口 2 My sister was sitting on the chair, with her legs ( 2 crossing の crossed (九州国際大) 3 to cross D cross Mie: In Japan, when people become eighteen, they (are / enough/ LO 3 Kathy wants to buy her own house in the future, ( 2 no matter ) small it may be. get / old /to) a driver's license. (センター) 3 even if のwhatever (西南学院大) O however ロロ 4 People think differently according ( r ) whether they are young or old 3 to コ 44 私の伯父の服の状態から判断すると,彼は昨夜あれを着たまま寝たんだ。 from / state/ the / clothes / judging / of / uncle's), he slept D at 2 of の with (大阪経済大) (my in them last night. ロ□ 5 Itis ( ) great importance to preserve nature. 3 of (中央大) O for 2 in のwith (立命館大) Due ロロ 6 ジョンはその映画には行きません。それにナンシーも行きません。 John is not going to the movie.( O So is Nancy ロロ 15(the first thing / what /to/I) say is that I really appreciate want 2 Nor Nancy is の Nancy isn't, either your help. [1 語不要] lo (畿央大) 3 Nancy is neither (法政大) lab tubdtrw biagss 7 X: My brother keeps complaining about his job. Y: Well, people who are not ( D considerable ロロ )with their work often do that. 2 constant 口 16 彼は古代史の理解にかけては誰にもひけをとらなかった。 He was (to / ancient / in / second / of / his / understanding/none) history. 3 content convenient (北海学園大) p boog B(中央大) 口 8 Mr. Swann always says that he hates complicated modern technologY, SO he is still ( ) to use a mobile phone. 2 willing O reluctant 3 instinctive の prudent (京都外国語大) LU17 広報担当の方をお願いします。 (中央大) 9 A: Have you finished your homework? B: Sorry, Mom. Ill do it ( O lately Td (public / someone / in / to charge / of / to talk) relations. like 2 recently 3 right away の suddenly (愛知学院大)

回答募集中 回答数: 0
数学 高校生

私はいまニュージーランドに留学している今年度上智大学を受験予定の高校2年生です。上智大学の経営学科の帰国生入試には和訳問題があるのですが、どれも自分には難しく、現地の先生にアドバイスしていただいてもいまいちわかりません。どなたか、回答を教えていただければと思います。 下線... 続きを読む

Why - and why now? Because of the shift in the Experience Economy. Goods and services are no longer enough; what consumer want today are experience - memorable events that engage them in an inherently personal way. As paid-for experiences proliferate, people now decide where and when to spend their money and time - the currency of experiences - as much if not more than they deliberate on what and how to buy (the purview of goods and services). (1) But in a world increasingly filled with deliberately and sensationally staged experiences - an increasingly unreal world - consumers choose to buy or not buy based on how real they perceive an offering to be. Business today, therefore, is all about being real. Original. Genuine. Sincere. Authentic. In any industry where experiences come to the fore, issues of authenticity follow closely behind. Think of Disneyland. No place before or since its opening in 1955 has provoked more debate on authenticity within modern culture, nor has any other business sparked more controversy on the effect of commercial activity on the reality of modern living than the Walt Disney Company. (2) Or think coffee. Starbucks earns several dollars for every cup of coffee, over and above the few cents the beans are worth, precisely because it has learned to stage a distinctive coffee-drinking experience centered on the ambience of each place and the theatre of making each cup. Perhaps no other company in the world more earnestly and steadfastly seeks to render authenticity ー resolutely shaping how real consumers perceive it to be. The task has become harder and harder, however, as Starbucks has grown from one shop in Seattle to over 13,000 venues around the world, for nothing kills authenticity like ubiquity. The success of Starbucks no longer depends on its operational prowess or taste superiority; it lies solely in sustaining coffee drinkers' perception of the Starbucks experience as authentic. (3) Now that the Experience Economy has reached full flower - supplanting the Service Economy as it had in turn overtaken the Industrial Economy, which itself had replace the Agrarian Economy - such issues of authenticity now bear down on not only all experience offerings but across all of the economyY.

回答募集中 回答数: 0
英語 高校生

英語に自信がある人回答づくりお願いします! ※書き込みは気にしないでください。 これプラス、問題に続きがあって、 問5 本文には、実物の動物を見ることによって人々がより深く理解できることが3つ書かれています。それらを日本語で答えなさい。 問6 本文には、動物園... 続きを読む

第4問 次の英文を読んで、 設問に答えなさい。①~6は段落番号です。 黒体 6) のIn my view, (1)it_is perfectly possible for many species of animals living in gon.. ie parks to have a quality of life as high as, or higher than, in the wild. 'Animals in ood z0os get a varied and high-quality diet with all the supplements required. and anv 1pesses they might have will be treated.Their movement might be somewhat restricted. mt they have a safe environment in which to live, and they are spared bullying and social 神年 predators*2 or the irritation and pain of parasites or injuries. The average captive animal racism*1 by others of their kind. They do not suffer from the threat or stress of will have a greater life expectancy compared with its wild counterpart, and will not die of drought, of starvation or in the jaws of a predator. Alot of very nasty things happen to truly wild' animals that simply don't happen in good zoos, and to view a life that is 'free' as 術保者一 one that is automatically ‘good' is, I think, an error. Furthermore, zoos serve several key purposes. の Firstly, zoos aid conservation. Colossal numbers of species are becoming extinct across the world, and many more are increasingly threatened and therefore risk extinction. Moreover, some of these collapses have been sudden, dramatic and unexpected, or were simply discovered very late in the day. Aspecies protected in captivity can be bred up to provide a reservoir*3 population against a population crash or extinction in the wild. A good number of species only exist in captivity, with many ofthese livinginzoos. Stillmore only exist in the wildbecause they have been reintroduced from zoos, or have wild populations that have been1o0osted by captive bred animals Without (2these efforts there would be fewer species alive today. Although reintroduction successes are few and far between*4, the numbers are increasing, and the very fact that species have been saved or reintroduced as a result of captive breeding proves the value of such initiatives. ③ Zoos alsoprovide education. Many children and adults, especially those in cities, will never see a wild animal beyond a fox or pigeon. While it is true that television documentaries are becoming ever more detailed and impressive, and many natural history specimens are on display in museums, there really is nothing to compare with seeinga living creature in the flesh*5, hearing it, smelling it, watching what it does and having the time to absorb details. That alone will bring a greater understanding and perspective to many, and hopefully give them a greater appreciation for wildlife, conservation efforts and how they can contribute. ④ Inaddition to this, there isalsothe education that cantake place in Z0Osthrough signs, talks and presentations which directly communicate information to visitors about the animals they are seeing and their place in the world. This was an area where zoos used to be lacking, but they are now increasingly sophisticated in their communication and 8.

回答募集中 回答数: 0
英語 高校生

英語に自信がある人回答づくりお願いします! ※書き込みは気にしないでください。 これプラス、問題に続きがあって、 問5 本文には、実物の動物を見ることによって人々がより深く理解できることが3つ書かれています。それらを日本語で答えなさい。 問6 本文には、動物園... 続きを読む

第4問 次の英文を読んで、 設問に答えなさい。①~6は段落番号です。 黒体 6) のIn my view, (1)it_is perfectly possible for many species of animals living in gon.. ie parks to have a quality of life as high as, or higher than, in the wild. 'Animals in ood z0os get a varied and high-quality diet with all the supplements required. and anv 1pesses they might have will be treated.Their movement might be somewhat restricted. mt they have a safe environment in which to live, and they are spared bullying and social 神年 predators*2 or the irritation and pain of parasites or injuries. The average captive animal racism*1 by others of their kind. They do not suffer from the threat or stress of will have a greater life expectancy compared with its wild counterpart, and will not die of drought, of starvation or in the jaws of a predator. Alot of very nasty things happen to truly wild' animals that simply don't happen in good zoos, and to view a life that is 'free' as 術保者一 one that is automatically ‘good' is, I think, an error. Furthermore, zoos serve several key purposes. の Firstly, zoos aid conservation. Colossal numbers of species are becoming extinct across the world, and many more are increasingly threatened and therefore risk extinction. Moreover, some of these collapses have been sudden, dramatic and unexpected, or were simply discovered very late in the day. Aspecies protected in captivity can be bred up to provide a reservoir*3 population against a population crash or extinction in the wild. A good number of species only exist in captivity, with many ofthese livinginzoos. Stillmore only exist in the wildbecause they have been reintroduced from zoos, or have wild populations that have been1o0osted by captive bred animals Without (2these efforts there would be fewer species alive today. Although reintroduction successes are few and far between*4, the numbers are increasing, and the very fact that species have been saved or reintroduced as a result of captive breeding proves the value of such initiatives. ③ Zoos alsoprovide education. Many children and adults, especially those in cities, will never see a wild animal beyond a fox or pigeon. While it is true that television documentaries are becoming ever more detailed and impressive, and many natural history specimens are on display in museums, there really is nothing to compare with seeinga living creature in the flesh*5, hearing it, smelling it, watching what it does and having the time to absorb details. That alone will bring a greater understanding and perspective to many, and hopefully give them a greater appreciation for wildlife, conservation efforts and how they can contribute. ④ Inaddition to this, there isalsothe education that cantake place in Z0Osthrough signs, talks and presentations which directly communicate information to visitors about the animals they are seeing and their place in the world. This was an area where zoos used to be lacking, but they are now increasingly sophisticated in their communication and 8.

回答募集中 回答数: 0