学年

質問の種類

英語 高校生

英作文の問題です。長崎大学の過去問だと思います。 自分の英文以外の意見を読みたいので、自由英作お願いします🙇🏻‍♀️ これについて、日本語でも大丈夫です🙌🏻

(経済·医·歯·薬 環境科学·教育(中学校教育コース文系)多文化社会学部志願者のみ) 5 図1と図2を見て,次の2つの問いに,それぞれ100語程度の英語で答えなさい。 According to Figure 1 and Figure 2, what is the recent situation of paid parental (child-care) leave in Japan? 2. Do you think that more fathers should take paid parental leave? Give at least two reasons to support your opinion. (そのて~8) 100r(%) Figure 2. Japanese workers taking paid parental leave Figure 1. Paid parental leave available to fathers Japan 90- South Korea Portugal Sweden Luxembourg 80 Women Norway Iceland 70 Austria Finland 60 Germany France Belgiurn 50 Rornania Lithuania Croatia Slovenia Spain Poland 5.0 Men Estonia Bulgaria Lalvia 2.5 Denmark 0.0 Turkey Mexico 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 Hungary Chile year Australia Britain (Adapted from Parental leave among Netherlands Italy Greece Malta men reaches 'record high' of 2.65%, Canada Cyprus Czech Republic Ireland Israel Mainichi Japan, 27 July 2016) New Zealand Slovakla Switzerland United States 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 (woeks) (Adapted from Japan has the best paternity leave system, but who's using it?, Nippon. com, 25 July 2019)

回答募集中 回答数: 0
理科 中学生

中学3年生の理科探求レポートです 最後の考察をかくヒントを頂きたいですです、、 今年度習ったことから調べたいことを探求レポートにするというものなのですが、内容の中心をメンデルという人物にしてしまったせいで考察が書きずらいです メンデルのこと、メンデルが行った実験、メンデルの... 続きを読む

受化してし No. DATE の法願とそれを売見したとンでル 子イでのすーストラリアで初めて通在を電見したかい聞しにはまた ったく箱 紹行セれたィンでルだか詳しい内容や 彼nこと Gれてuな4った。そンてuXンで(L ℃ c( 5△年m について調 こつu7無く理厳しまうと思い、調て みることにしてe 。 No DATE 学春、抱物学着なひかい "ニし もteoです "圧迫されていて後にとって (意料案 P61より) 遠院の司案でし856年658年間、エンドウを用いた実際を使った すの周りの人でなには理酢されす、彼の花後1900年以降になり 様の発児拡さ れ、ベンデリルの定き評価されでe。 雪の中で植物等.動物学 種子のを子葉の色花のつも方 の高 やの形させの色機皮の色 有色 こるために教師をして 天き生(素 高 くdれ 緑色 項生(幸の (884年61歳て広。 但い くひれ無色 無色 緑色 ふくれ 希条色 有色 えき生 705 224 929 あり第一世代は 13.6性は 428 987 277 882 65L 207 6022 5474 1850 1324 8023 月296:1 13,01:1 314:h 28 k85:128213.15:1 152 580 299 2001 I064 (181 858 そもった個体 ti0 3:1 6午月 25 痛では、開性の接備:適性の施備=3:1 れ低立にも ルはどんなん物mなのか> ルン、Xンテリル 記に生きたオーズストラリア帝風の可宿(カトリュク教会ぞリシャ正教会、電伝aの 清で修適院に所属力る管5自然科学を学び Xンデルn法則を売見した。 子ルルイングェンドルという徴の幕家に生まれ.成長すまにつれ自然科学 味をもて キカらオロもウリいラ統の大学哲学や物理を遊にだのちでュンの倍種虎へ のよう。 の流 現在のチェっ売和回 ヒンチツzのこを セランドと直い ア- ドラゴンルの心寄日×ディア Sndy -Z /つ花で構格なンでルってを必なイて、

回答募集中 回答数: 0
英語 高校生

見辛かったらすみませんが、問2の英作文の添削をしていただきたいです🤲

2015年度 英語 13 They should not have to lose their livelihoods. Secondlv. although I agree 次の英文は、英語のディベートの授業での対話です。この対話を読み,下の問い に答えなさい。 with Keiko that climate change is a serious problem, I think air travel is a much less damaging source of carbon pollution than, for example, burnimg MR. ROBERTS: Good morning, everybody. Today we have the first of our Coal. We should address these more serious causes first. Finally, the most student debates. The topic this morning is air travel, and the argument is. 法 important reason is the issue of freedom. People in a democracy expect the “Domestic air travel in Japan should be discouraged." Keiko will first argue right to travel as they wish. It has made our lives more convenient and in favor of the proposal and Junko will speak against. Over to you, Keiko. created more opportunities for everyone. We should not reduce our quality of life. Thank you for listening. KEIKO: Good morning, everybody. I am going to speak today in favor of the proposal. Limitless air travel inside Japan is a luxury that we can no longer MR. ROBERTS: Thank you to our two speakers. Now, are there any afford. The main reason is that it is extremely damaging to the questions from the audience? environment. The carbon gases produced by aircraft are very high and are a 頭人 proven cause of global warming. Therefore, we should try and reduce air 問1 次の(1)~(5)の文について, 本文の内容と一致するものには○.一致しないも travel as much as possible to protect the environment, not only for Japan but のには×を,それぞれ解答欄に記入しなさい。 also for the whole world. Secondly, air travel is actually unnecessary within the four islands of Japan. Now, while I appreciate that travel to Okinawa is (1) Keiko's main reason for opposing domestic air travel is the damage it a different case, there are efficient train services throughout Japan that are causes to the environment. h fast and environmentally friendly. These make an excellent alternative to air (2) Keiko thinks that air travel is cheap and efficient. flights, so there is really no need to use airplanes in most cases. Finally, (3) Keiko recommends that people travel between Okinawa and mainland there is an economic reason. Air travel is expensive for passengers because Japan by ship. the price of fuel keeps increasing, but airline companies are still struggling (4) Junko thinks that climate change is not an important problem. to make profits. Moreover, regional airports often cannot attract enough (5) Junko thinks that a lot of jobs will be lost if air travel is reduced. customers, and, overall, the industry is not cost-effective, It's time to admit that air travel is too damaging and expensive to be sustainable. Thank you. 問2 次の質問に英語で答えなさい。 Which of the two speakers do you more agree with? Give at least one JUNKO: Thank you, Keiko. I am going to disagree with the proposal for three reason for your answer. (解答欄:13.8cm×4行) reasons. Firstly, I think there is a strong economic case to support flying. Many jobs depend on air travel, not just the pilots and cabin staff, but also people who work in airports or for airlines, or who rely on fast transport.

回答募集中 回答数: 0
英語 高校生

見辛かったらすみませんが、問2の英作文の添削をしていただきたいです🤲

2015年度 英語 13 They should not have to lose their livelihoods. Secondlv. although I agree 次の英文は、英語のディベートの授業での対話です。この対話を読み,下の問い に答えなさい。 with Keiko that climate change is a serious problem, I think air travel is a much less damaging source of carbon pollution than, for example, burnimg MR. ROBERTS: Good morning, everybody. Today we have the first of our Coal. We should address these more serious causes first. Finally, the most student debates. The topic this morning is air travel, and the argument is. 法 important reason is the issue of freedom. People in a democracy expect the “Domestic air travel in Japan should be discouraged." Keiko will first argue right to travel as they wish. It has made our lives more convenient and in favor of the proposal and Junko will speak against. Over to you, Keiko. created more opportunities for everyone. We should not reduce our quality of life. Thank you for listening. KEIKO: Good morning, everybody. I am going to speak today in favor of the proposal. Limitless air travel inside Japan is a luxury that we can no longer MR. ROBERTS: Thank you to our two speakers. Now, are there any afford. The main reason is that it is extremely damaging to the questions from the audience? environment. The carbon gases produced by aircraft are very high and are a 頭人 proven cause of global warming. Therefore, we should try and reduce air 問1 次の(1)~(5)の文について, 本文の内容と一致するものには○.一致しないも travel as much as possible to protect the environment, not only for Japan but のには×を,それぞれ解答欄に記入しなさい。 also for the whole world. Secondly, air travel is actually unnecessary within the four islands of Japan. Now, while I appreciate that travel to Okinawa is (1) Keiko's main reason for opposing domestic air travel is the damage it a different case, there are efficient train services throughout Japan that are causes to the environment. h fast and environmentally friendly. These make an excellent alternative to air (2) Keiko thinks that air travel is cheap and efficient. flights, so there is really no need to use airplanes in most cases. Finally, (3) Keiko recommends that people travel between Okinawa and mainland there is an economic reason. Air travel is expensive for passengers because Japan by ship. the price of fuel keeps increasing, but airline companies are still struggling (4) Junko thinks that climate change is not an important problem. to make profits. Moreover, regional airports often cannot attract enough (5) Junko thinks that a lot of jobs will be lost if air travel is reduced. customers, and, overall, the industry is not cost-effective, It's time to admit that air travel is too damaging and expensive to be sustainable. Thank you. 問2 次の質問に英語で答えなさい。 Which of the two speakers do you more agree with? Give at least one JUNKO: Thank you, Keiko. I am going to disagree with the proposal for three reason for your answer. (解答欄:13.8cm×4行) reasons. Firstly, I think there is a strong economic case to support flying. Many jobs depend on air travel, not just the pilots and cabin staff, but also people who work in airports or for airlines, or who rely on fast transport.

回答募集中 回答数: 0