第二段落三行目のhand on hipとhead on an angleのhandとheadは動詞として使われているのでしょうか？教えて頂きたいです。よろしくお願いいたします。

9 @ 次の英文を読み, 設問に答えよ。 1 Start State Jackie Jeant idly against the window frame, staring out at the beach in front of the house. (In the distance down the beach she could see the familiar figure in the blue dress slowly coming towards the house. She loved these moments when she could watch her daughter in secret Toni was growing up fast. 5 since she and the confused little seven-year-old had arrived here. How Toni had 5 It seemed no time adored her father! When she was still only five or six years old, they would all 出かける make the long trip from the city to the beach every weekend, and Toni would go out with him into the wildest waves, bravely holding on to his back, screaming in pleasure as they played in the waves together. She had trusted him entirely. And 10 then he had left them. No message, no anything. Just like that. She could make (2) Toni's figure quite clearly now. She saw her put her shoes onto the rocks near the water's edge and walk into the wet sand, then just stand there, hand on hip, head on an angle, staring down. What was she thinking? 手にす 目的 強烈さ Jackie felt a surge of love that was almost shocking in its intensity. "I'd do anything 5 for her," she found herself saying aloud, "anything." 中ては飛さない

この文についてなのですがcannotと動詞resistとの間に形容詞longあるのですがこのような形を取ることは可能なのでしょうか？教えて頂きたいです。よろしくお願いいたします。

STS\A [MU] (D) (MRA) Even the Eskimos, who appear so well adapted to the Arctic climate, in reality cannot long resist intense cold. Sheltered in their snow houses or clothed in their parkas, they live an almost tropical life! tropical (adj) = of or characteristic of the tropics (= the hottest area of the earth) [ live an almost tropical life という表現のおもしろさとは? Stats 4 & 12

1~6の下線部に入る問題なのですが、合ってるか自信がないので見て欲しいです。あと、4はわからなかったので教えて欲しいです。 どなたかすみませんがよろしくお願いします🙇‍♀️

Task 1 Complete the negative question. 1. Aren't these the most delicious burgers ever? A Yes. They're quite good. 2. Q Aren't today? you done enough work for A Yes. I'm really tired. 3. Q Aren't someone driving you home? 4. Didn't he there when you went to A No. I'm just going to walk. his office? 5. Q Aren't you love exploring the outdoors? A No way. I'm afraid of bears. A No. I haven't seen him in a week. 6. Q Aren't we not going to the bank? No. It's already closed.

赤線部についてwhat toが「どう〜か」という訳になっているのはなぜですか？🙇🏻‍♀️

40 テレビの子供への影響 179 words 1 Many people are concerned about what television has done to the generation of American children who have grown up watching it. For one thing, TV deprives children of creative imagination Some teachers feel that television has taken away the child's 5 ability to form mental pictures in his own mind, resulting in children who cannot figure out a simple story without visual illustrations. For another, too much TV too early tends to cause children to turn away from real life. As a result, they grow up to be passive spectators who can only respond to action, but not take 10 the initiative in doing anything. 2 Another area for concern is that children are short of tolerance for learning. They don't know what to do with some problems if it takes them too long to solve them, because they have been conditioned to see all problems solved in 30 or 60 minutes on TV 15 3 Television violence in particular has the most serious impact on children, most of whom get used to it and become incapable of 17 sympathizing with the pains of others. Tegala Jasd edited

S'のbadly behaved childrenについてなのですが、省略している部分を戻して考えるとchildren are behaving badlyになると思い、badly behaving childrenが正しいと思ったのですが間違いですか？教えて欲しいです！

Almost a quarter think [badly behaved children are the biggest problem S V 0 S V C 《 facing schools > 1 - a higher proportion (than those blaming poor teaching, overcrowding or lack of parental support >>). ほぼ4分の1の親が,【行儀のよくない子どもたちこそが《学校が直面している》 最大の問 題である】 と考えている―これは(《教師の教え方のつたなさ, 生徒数の過密, 〈親の支援 が〉欠如していること を非難する》 親の割合より) 高い割合である。 a quarter の直後には of parents が省略されていると考えるとよい。 those は 「人々」 という意味で使うこともできる。 ここでは 「親」のこと。 hojsm Inow

Many people from abroad say,”() about Japan was how safe it is.” あThat I was very surprised いThat made me most surprised うWhat I was m... 続きを読む

比較の問題です。合っているか確認お願いします🙇

2. 次の各組の文がほぼ同じ意味になるように,( )に適当な1語を入れなさい。 (2) (3) 4). Health is the most precious thing. ) is more precious ( Your pencil is twice as long as mine. Your pencil is twice ( ) health. ) ( ) of mine. (He is two years older than Ayaka. He is ( ) to Ayaka ( ) two years. They have less rain in America than we do in Japan. They don't have ( )( ) rain in America ( ) we do in Japan. 1体の表をなさい

49行目についてなのですがhealthy enoughを十分健康と捉えてしまったのですが和訳がほどほどに健康となっていました。なぜそのように捉えたのか分からないので教えて頂きたいです。よろしくお願いいたします。

45 distribution was valid; all the rest had to be thrown ou the IQ scores now fall into a bell curve mainly because that is where the original English and American *psychometricians thought they should fall. But suppose they'd started out with different preconceptions. Suppose they believed that "intelligence" was something like "health": some people were weak and some were strong, but most people were "healthy enough." Their bodies may have been shaped differently, but one 50 type couldn't be called healthier than another. In that case, the distribution of IQ scores would have been very different.

英文法関係代名詞です。 下の空所補充問題なんですが、なぜ「which」ではなく「where」なんでしょうか?

(10) It is important for the government to deliver financial resources to ( 1 where ) they are needed most. 【桜美林大 *】 2 what 3 which 4 that

以前画像3枚目の様に修飾限定予告のthatというものを習ったので今回もその形なのかと思い、それらのと入れずに訳してしまったのですがこのthoseの識別は文脈判断ということでしょうか？ 教えて頂きたいです。よろしくお願いいたします。

実理 K The starting point for today's *meritocracy, of course, is the idea that intelligence exists and can be measured, like weight or strength or fluency in French. The most obvious difference between intelligence and these other traits is that all the others are presumably changeable. If someone weighs too much, he can go on a その人 →Heyで受けるのが一般的 5 diet; if he's weak, he can lift weights; if he wants to learn French, he can take a course. But in principle he can't change his intelligence. There is another important difference 原則として MV between intelligence and other traits. Height and weight and speed and strength and サフィス体例 関係性が強い文がくる even conversational fluency are real things; there's no doubt about what's being 間違いなん measured. Intelligence is a much murkier concept. Some people are generally (2) m2 Vogue 10 smarter than others, and some are obviously talented in specific ways; they're chess 天才 S masters, math *prodigies. But can the factors that make one person seem quicker than another be measured precisely, like height and weight? Can we confidently say that one person is 10 percent smarter than another, in the same way we can say he's 10 へんて、いつだっ S percent faster in the hundred-yard dash? And can we be confident that two thirds of 櫂へん 言いかえ 15 all people have IQs within one standard deviation of the norm that is, between 90 ように and 110 - - as we can be sure that two thirds of all people have heights within one standard deviation of the norm for height? Yes, they can, and yes, we can. besure least, are the answers that the IQ part of the meritocracy rests on. Those, at (3)-