2021年北海道大学の自由英作文の添削をおねがいします🙏 QuestionCです。

I think that liberal ats subjects shauld be Considered more Tmportant in the vear fitwe. I have tro easons . First, more andl more peaple thinh diversity is important these days. A liberal aris education let students to think variety. Second, there are a lot of Occupation than. tew years ago, To have. alot of shills is very important for us. So, likeral orts subjects should be conside more important in the near future. (74話)

問4① 彼らは少ない時間でより生産的になる、というのが仕事に対して言っていると特定できるのは何故でしょうか、、、？？ 本文で生産的になるのが仕事のことしか言っていないからでしょうか？？

第3回 実戦問題 73 Vou are going to have a debate about men taking parental leave. In order to prepare for the debate, your group is reading the article below. According t0 a recent survey, about 5.14% of new fathers in Japan Love taken parental leave. Over the years, the number of men who take 18u0 narental leave has grown, but it is still a big challenge for men to take it in male-oriented-Japanese society. So, here is my question: Do you think more Japanese men should take parental leave or not? Taking parental leave has one great benefit. If men take it for even a couple of weeks after the baby arrives, it is a great help to their wives. Most families are now nuclear families, so it is more difficult for couples with a new child to get support from their parents. Husbands can provide not only physical support but also mental support to their wives. Since new mothers face many unexpected situations every day, they can feel a lot of stress. Getting help is the key to reducing it. Another benefit is that parental leave is usually refreshing for men, allowing them to work more efficiently after they return to their jobs. On the other hand, there are reasons men should not take it. (First, during parental leave, they get no salary. This can put a lot of pressure on family finances. Second, many people are still against men taking it, which places psychological pressure on the men who do. What do you think about this issue? Ibelieve that when men take parental leave, it helps them understand how hard caring for a baby is. Knowing more about the hard work of their wives surely strengthens their relationship. Furthermore, when men eagerly raise their children, Tamily bonds become stronger. Nobody could argue that such things should be not be encouraged. 第3回 don

左の英文を読んで、右のA以外の問題を解いて欲しいですm(_ _)mお願いしますm(_ _)m

ZUJU 安全ではありません nanun-do.hondana.jp 安全ではありません- nanun-do.hondana.jp increasingly competes for fans with sports like football, basketball or ( ins greatly popular worldwide. 30 8/10 9/10 Baseball 2 People have debated the origins of baseball for many years. Some say baseball is an American variation of the British-born sport rounders. Where Understanding the Passage did people first play baseball? Whether baseball is a purely American game or it A. Listen and fill in the blanks in the reading passage. 音声を聞いて本文の空欄に適切な語句を入れなさい。 originated somewhere else, it is (°clear) that baseball has become B. True or False Questions a very popular American sport and has (°given) people excitement and Reading Passage の内容に合っているものにはT、間違っているものには Fをつけなさい。 ) There is no clear answer regarding the birth of baseball. 10 pleasure for many decades. ) No Japanese had ever played in major league baseball before Nomo. )“Take Me Out to the Ball Game" is a title of a movie. There are many indications of baseball's popularity throughout ) Fukudome's debut at the opening game was a great success. American (℃ulture). One famous example is the song "Take Me Out to the Ball Game". Spectators sing this song in the middle of the seventh inning. So the 7th inning break period is called the "7th inning stretch". C. Answer the following questions. 以下の質問に英語で答えなさい。 1. Where did rounders originate? 15 Now the more recent popularity of baseball may to some extent be 2. When do spectators sing the song "Take Me Out to the Ball Game"? resulting from the presence of many prominent foreign ( players ) in the major leagues. For instance, recently we have seen the appearance of more and more Japanese players in major league baseball. A (®wave ) of 3. Where did Nomo start his major league career? 20 Japanese professional players coming into the major leagues started when 4. What do baseball fans call baseball? Hideo Nomo (became) his major league career as a Los Angeles Dodgers pitcher in 1995. Nomo was the first Japanese major leaguer (°since) D. Translate into English using the words provided. 以下の日本文を( 1.私の故郷は何十年も変わっていない。 (for decades) 1965 and was credited with paving the way for Japanese players facing the )内の語を用いて英訳しなさい。 challenge of major league baseball. Most recently, Kosuke Fukudome made a very stunning debut as the (®Chicago) Cubs right fielder. He had three hits, including a homer, in three at bats in the opening game of the 2008 season. Now avid fans still (® call) baseball the "national pastime". Baseball increasingly competes for fans with sports like football, basketball or ('soccer). but it still remains greatly popular worldwide. 25 2. 停電は強風のために起きた。( result from) 3. あなたの申し出によって私の成功への道が開かれるでしょう。(pave the way for) 30 8 NOTES British-born:イギリス生まれの rounders:野球のルーツといわれる球技 result from:生じる decade:10 年間 spectator:観客 to some extent:ある程度 prominent:目立った、顕著な pave the way for ~:~への道を開く appearance:出現 avid:熱狂的な for instance:例えば stunning:素晴らしい 9 Understanding the Passage A. Listen and fill in the blanks in the reading passage. 音声を聞いて本文の空欄に適切な語句を入れなさい。 CIapeT

英語の長文ってどうやったら読めるようになりますか

1 次の英文を読んで、問 (1) ~ (5) に且本語で答えなさい。 Lobola is the African custom of paying fora bride. Although it is an old custom, not In fact, it is being debated in Botswana. everyone in African cultures is happy with it. Many people, including many women, support payment of lobola. They explain that in Tswana culture, a marriage means joining a family, not just marrying an individual. The idea of marrying into a family is very African. just the man.Through marriage, the young woman's family loses their daughter as she then becomes a part of her husband's family. Lobola is a way to show thanks. It is a form of generosity in African culture. In its traditional form, they also explain, the groom's family gave cattle to the bride's family. But it didn't matter whether the family owned cattle or not. A woman does not get married to A man only had to pay what he could afford if he had no cattle, he could give something else, even the smallest form of payment. The tradition of lobola was a matter of pride. Today, lobola is often given in cash. purchase of a bride. Lobola is meant to join two families together. They know that But its supporters say it is not about the some people abuse the custom. But they believe that the tradition should not be tossed out because it has many positive effects. Rather than get rid of it, many believe it should just be explained better. However, many others say this custom should be stopped. They think it has become commercialized. Families make lots of demands on the groom. They think this makes lobola look very bad. They argue that in Africa's past, a girl was an asset at home. and other household chores. She did the cooking When a family lost that child through marriage, it demanded payment. Today, they think that lobola has changed into a useless tradition. In this custom, a man is buying the right to control a woman. They say women are individuals with rights. In today's world, parents do not have to be paid for a bride because their male and female children are equal. They all work and make contributions to the household. They believe that paying lobola makes it seem like a man is buying a pair of shoes or a bicycle, instead of getting married. They also argue that it is often a financial burden for couples. It is too difficult for many people to pay the price asked. So, is lobola a rich tradition, bringing families together? Or is it an ugly custom of buying women? This debate continues in Botswana, as does the custom.

見辛かったらすみませんが、問2の英作文の添削をしていただきたいです🤲

2015年度 英語 13 They should not have to lose their livelihoods. Secondlv. although I agree 次の英文は、英語のディベートの授業での対話です。この対話を読み,下の問い に答えなさい。 with Keiko that climate change is a serious problem, I think air travel is a much less damaging source of carbon pollution than, for example, burnimg MR. ROBERTS: Good morning, everybody. Today we have the first of our Coal. We should address these more serious causes first. Finally, the most student debates. The topic this morning is air travel, and the argument is. 法 important reason is the issue of freedom. People in a democracy expect the “Domestic air travel in Japan should be discouraged." Keiko will first argue right to travel as they wish. It has made our lives more convenient and in favor of the proposal and Junko will speak against. Over to you, Keiko. created more opportunities for everyone. We should not reduce our quality of life. Thank you for listening. KEIKO: Good morning, everybody. I am going to speak today in favor of the proposal. Limitless air travel inside Japan is a luxury that we can no longer MR. ROBERTS: Thank you to our two speakers. Now, are there any afford. The main reason is that it is extremely damaging to the questions from the audience? environment. The carbon gases produced by aircraft are very high and are a 頭人 proven cause of global warming. Therefore, we should try and reduce air 問1 次の(1)~(5)の文について, 本文の内容と一致するものには○.一致しないも travel as much as possible to protect the environment, not only for Japan but のには×を,それぞれ解答欄に記入しなさい。 also for the whole world. Secondly, air travel is actually unnecessary within the four islands of Japan. Now, while I appreciate that travel to Okinawa is (1) Keiko's main reason for opposing domestic air travel is the damage it a different case, there are efficient train services throughout Japan that are causes to the environment. h fast and environmentally friendly. These make an excellent alternative to air (2) Keiko thinks that air travel is cheap and efficient. flights, so there is really no need to use airplanes in most cases. Finally, (3) Keiko recommends that people travel between Okinawa and mainland there is an economic reason. Air travel is expensive for passengers because Japan by ship. the price of fuel keeps increasing, but airline companies are still struggling (4) Junko thinks that climate change is not an important problem. to make profits. Moreover, regional airports often cannot attract enough (5) Junko thinks that a lot of jobs will be lost if air travel is reduced. customers, and, overall, the industry is not cost-effective, It's time to admit that air travel is too damaging and expensive to be sustainable. Thank you. 問2 次の質問に英語で答えなさい。 Which of the two speakers do you more agree with? Give at least one JUNKO: Thank you, Keiko. I am going to disagree with the proposal for three reason for your answer. (解答欄:13.8cm×4行) reasons. Firstly, I think there is a strong economic case to support flying. Many jobs depend on air travel, not just the pilots and cabin staff, but also people who work in airports or for airlines, or who rely on fast transport.

見辛かったらすみませんが、問2の英作文の添削をしていただきたいです🤲

2015年度 英語 13 They should not have to lose their livelihoods. Secondlv. although I agree 次の英文は、英語のディベートの授業での対話です。この対話を読み,下の問い に答えなさい。 with Keiko that climate change is a serious problem, I think air travel is a much less damaging source of carbon pollution than, for example, burnimg MR. ROBERTS: Good morning, everybody. Today we have the first of our Coal. We should address these more serious causes first. Finally, the most student debates. The topic this morning is air travel, and the argument is. 法 important reason is the issue of freedom. People in a democracy expect the “Domestic air travel in Japan should be discouraged." Keiko will first argue right to travel as they wish. It has made our lives more convenient and in favor of the proposal and Junko will speak against. Over to you, Keiko. created more opportunities for everyone. We should not reduce our quality of life. Thank you for listening. KEIKO: Good morning, everybody. I am going to speak today in favor of the proposal. Limitless air travel inside Japan is a luxury that we can no longer MR. ROBERTS: Thank you to our two speakers. Now, are there any afford. The main reason is that it is extremely damaging to the questions from the audience? environment. The carbon gases produced by aircraft are very high and are a 頭人 proven cause of global warming. Therefore, we should try and reduce air 問1 次の(1)~(5)の文について, 本文の内容と一致するものには○.一致しないも travel as much as possible to protect the environment, not only for Japan but のには×を,それぞれ解答欄に記入しなさい。 also for the whole world. Secondly, air travel is actually unnecessary within the four islands of Japan. Now, while I appreciate that travel to Okinawa is (1) Keiko's main reason for opposing domestic air travel is the damage it a different case, there are efficient train services throughout Japan that are causes to the environment. h fast and environmentally friendly. These make an excellent alternative to air (2) Keiko thinks that air travel is cheap and efficient. flights, so there is really no need to use airplanes in most cases. Finally, (3) Keiko recommends that people travel between Okinawa and mainland there is an economic reason. Air travel is expensive for passengers because Japan by ship. the price of fuel keeps increasing, but airline companies are still struggling (4) Junko thinks that climate change is not an important problem. to make profits. Moreover, regional airports often cannot attract enough (5) Junko thinks that a lot of jobs will be lost if air travel is reduced. customers, and, overall, the industry is not cost-effective, It's time to admit that air travel is too damaging and expensive to be sustainable. Thank you. 問2 次の質問に英語で答えなさい。 Which of the two speakers do you more agree with? Give at least one JUNKO: Thank you, Keiko. I am going to disagree with the proposal for three reason for your answer. (解答欄:13.8cm×4行) reasons. Firstly, I think there is a strong economic case to support flying. Many jobs depend on air travel, not just the pilots and cabin staff, but also people who work in airports or for airlines, or who rely on fast transport.

英語　1から６　教えてください🙇🏻‍♀️

22:34 N A CO3 .l OD 閉じる ロ 三 choose the underlined part that is INCORRECT. (各1) or We must make up , for lost time by working as hardly as we can. 13 (昭和女子大) のMany authors find it hard to write about new environments_ where they did not know in childhood. ( bsn (立教大) 2 Let's go out on the veranda and enjoy to listen to the birds sing. (桜美林大) 4). We want to prevent a situation which people spread the disease because they are orty ignorant about it. (学習院大 改) 5) The reasons for the voyages of Columbus in 1492 and for Vasco da Gama in 1498 have (上智大) hoe の。 been long debated. ol9al hluow.1 odtow dowont bl le vant T bluow 6)I_ will take a trip this summer if I will have plenty of time. 0 (国土舘大) のこ w RT how tamnt oi Tou (7) If I have known you were coming, I would have baked your favorite cake. | (神奈川大) 1

英語　1から６　教えてください

choose the underlined part that is INCORRECT. (各1点)d eaoord 17 (7) We must make up for lost time by.working as hardly as /13 we can. (0 (昭和女子大) のMany authors find it hard to write about new environments where they did not knoW in childhood. (法政大) u bame (立教大) 3) Let's go out on the veranda and enjoy to listen to the birds sing. (桜美林大) (東洋大) 4) We want to prevent a situationwhich people spread the disease because they are の ignorant about it. w (学習院大 改) 工業大) 5) The reasons for the voyages of Columbus in 1492 and for Vasco da Gama in 1498 have U の二 (上智大) been long。 debated. caj 0ow ar diw domot orit yolng ot w.0 Ilso blyow e hglsa bat (国土舘大) (6)I_will take a trip this summer if I will have plenty of time. の の二 済大) (7) If I have known you were coming, I would have baked your favorite cake. 19ie (神奈川大) の 001(8

私はいまニュージーランドに留学している今年度上智大学を受験予定の高校2年生です。上智大学の経営学科の帰国生入試には和訳問題があるのですが、どれも自分には難しく、現地の先生にアドバイスしていただいてもいまいちわかりません。どなたか、回答を教えていただければと思います。 下線... 続きを読む

Why - and why now? Because of the shift in the Experience Economy. Goods and services are no longer enough; what consumer want today are experience - memorable events that engage them in an inherently personal way. As paid-for experiences proliferate, people now decide where and when to spend their money and time - the currency of experiences - as much if not more than they deliberate on what and how to buy (the purview of goods and services). (1) But in a world increasingly filled with deliberately and sensationally staged experiences - an increasingly unreal world - consumers choose to buy or not buy based on how real they perceive an offering to be. Business today, therefore, is all about being real. Original. Genuine. Sincere. Authentic. In any industry where experiences come to the fore, issues of authenticity follow closely behind. Think of Disneyland. No place before or since its opening in 1955 has provoked more debate on authenticity within modern culture, nor has any other business sparked more controversy on the effect of commercial activity on the reality of modern living than the Walt Disney Company. (2) Or think coffee. Starbucks earns several dollars for every cup of coffee, over and above the few cents the beans are worth, precisely because it has learned to stage a distinctive coffee-drinking experience centered on the ambience of each place and the theatre of making each cup. Perhaps no other company in the world more earnestly and steadfastly seeks to render authenticity ー resolutely shaping how real consumers perceive it to be. The task has become harder and harder, however, as Starbucks has grown from one shop in Seattle to over 13,000 venues around the world, for nothing kills authenticity like ubiquity. The success of Starbucks no longer depends on its operational prowess or taste superiority; it lies solely in sustaining coffee drinkers' perception of the Starbucks experience as authentic. (3) Now that the Experience Economy has reached full flower - supplanting the Service Economy as it had in turn overtaken the Industrial Economy, which itself had replace the Agrarian Economy - such issues of authenticity now bear down on not only all experience offerings but across all of the economyY.

至急お願いします🙇🏻‍♀️🙇🏻‍♀️

|2 次の文章は,日本文にあった「法」と「道徳」に関するものです。 読んだうえで設問に答え なさい。 When we think about the reach of the law, the first question is whether we have good reason to accept that the law has any proper authority | (ア)|all. (A) Why should we obey it? To a certain extent, the answer is implicit in the analysis of the “nature of law" question. (B) If law is held to be morally authoritative by definition, it will seem that an obligation to obey flows simply from the recognition of law as law. If the definition of law excludes this moral authority, the source of obligation must be sought elsewhere. The question about authority, however, is not as straightforward as this. What we are asking about is the kind of connection to be found (イ)| the authority of rulers to lay down laws and the legal and moral duty of the ruled to obey them. It is often asserted that there seems to be a general duty of obligation to obey the law. What (c) this means is that in the absence of special reasons which might justify a specific exemption, the acceptance of the duty of obedience presupposes the acknowledgement of the law's authority. (D) How it might lead to this, however, is a matter for debate. It may be for reasons quite independent (ウ)| the authoritative status of the law. The special reasons for suspending this presumption, furthermore, suggesting that there are limits to the general duty, must arise from considerations powerful enough to take priority over the standard reasons for obedience. 【設問】 (ウ) ずつ選びなさい。 I. (ア) に入る最も適当な語を, (a)~ (f)の中からそれぞれ1つ (イ) (ア)= ( へ (イ=( (ウ)= ( へ (a) of (b) on (c) of (d)from (e) at (f) between I. 下線部(C)の内容を日本語で簡潔に説明しなさい。 2