見辛かったらすみませんが、問2の英作文の添削をしていただきたいです🤲

2015年度 英語 13 They should not have to lose their livelihoods. Secondlv. although I agree 次の英文は、英語のディベートの授業での対話です。この対話を読み,下の問い に答えなさい。 with Keiko that climate change is a serious problem, I think air travel is a much less damaging source of carbon pollution than, for example, burnimg MR. ROBERTS: Good morning, everybody. Today we have the first of our Coal. We should address these more serious causes first. Finally, the most student debates. The topic this morning is air travel, and the argument is. 法 important reason is the issue of freedom. People in a democracy expect the “Domestic air travel in Japan should be discouraged." Keiko will first argue right to travel as they wish. It has made our lives more convenient and in favor of the proposal and Junko will speak against. Over to you, Keiko. created more opportunities for everyone. We should not reduce our quality of life. Thank you for listening. KEIKO: Good morning, everybody. I am going to speak today in favor of the proposal. Limitless air travel inside Japan is a luxury that we can no longer MR. ROBERTS: Thank you to our two speakers. Now, are there any afford. The main reason is that it is extremely damaging to the questions from the audience? environment. The carbon gases produced by aircraft are very high and are a 頭人 proven cause of global warming. Therefore, we should try and reduce air 問1 次の(1)~(5)の文について, 本文の内容と一致するものには○.一致しないも travel as much as possible to protect the environment, not only for Japan but のには×を,それぞれ解答欄に記入しなさい。 also for the whole world. Secondly, air travel is actually unnecessary within the four islands of Japan. Now, while I appreciate that travel to Okinawa is (1) Keiko's main reason for opposing domestic air travel is the damage it a different case, there are efficient train services throughout Japan that are causes to the environment. h fast and environmentally friendly. These make an excellent alternative to air (2) Keiko thinks that air travel is cheap and efficient. flights, so there is really no need to use airplanes in most cases. Finally, (3) Keiko recommends that people travel between Okinawa and mainland there is an economic reason. Air travel is expensive for passengers because Japan by ship. the price of fuel keeps increasing, but airline companies are still struggling (4) Junko thinks that climate change is not an important problem. to make profits. Moreover, regional airports often cannot attract enough (5) Junko thinks that a lot of jobs will be lost if air travel is reduced. customers, and, overall, the industry is not cost-effective, It's time to admit that air travel is too damaging and expensive to be sustainable. Thank you. 問2 次の質問に英語で答えなさい。 Which of the two speakers do you more agree with? Give at least one JUNKO: Thank you, Keiko. I am going to disagree with the proposal for three reason for your answer. (解答欄:13.8cm×4行) reasons. Firstly, I think there is a strong economic case to support flying. Many jobs depend on air travel, not just the pilots and cabin staff, but also people who work in airports or for airlines, or who rely on fast transport.

長文の下の9番の答えを教えください

measures to encourage tap water use. In Britain, bottles restrict the consumption of bottled water. In the United States, the Conference of Mayors in 2008 voted to take of water are no longer served at government meetings. 4 Around the world, many countries have started to VBWB restrict [ristrikt] consumption [kansámpJen] conference [ká:nfarans] mayor(s) [méior(z)] measure(s) [mézar(z)] 1-サムフェーし コv15しス government 5 [gávarnmont] Clearly, the movement against bottled water is growing. significant significant [signífikant] カンサプンョン B while the consumption of bottled water is a environmental concern in the developed world, the lack of concern [kansá:rn] clean drinking water is a major health problem in the developing world. developingldivelopig) The World Health Organization has 10 billion [biljan] found that over one billion people, mainly in poorer whatsoever [wAtsouévar] supplies [saplaiz] <supply portion [p5:r an] Countries, have no access to safe water whatsoever. 6 In order to improve world water supplies, some companies in the U.S. have started donating a portion of donation(s) [dounéijon(2)) sales from bottled water. Donations and lifestyle changes 15 will not immediately solve these global problems, but they direction [darékfan] are a small step in the right direction. Remember this the next time you think about buying a bottle of water. 9. in the developing worldと対比されている表現を抜き出しなさい。 3. the Conference of Mayors (全米)市長会 3. take measures 対策を講じる 10. the World Health Organization 世界保健機関 (WHO) 12. no access to safe water whatsoever = no access to safe water at all

100 times moreは何と比較しているか教えください

of the hottest environmental issues abroad is bottled 1 When thinking about the environment, the Japanese should take time to reconsider their lifestyles. Today, one bottled [bá:tld] ds Ales os issue(s) [ju:(z)] industry[indastri] water. Not only does the bottled water industry cost tne deal [di:1] planet a great deal in energy and materials, it has beCome a symbol of First World excess. 5 excess [iksés] ironic [airá:nik] wealthy[welli] willing[wilig) 2 It is ironic that, although consumers in wealthy Countries have safe drinking water, they are willing to pay up to 100 times more for bottled water because of clever packaging and attractive names. All the development that o has brought drinkable tap water to everyone in Japan packaging [pékidzig) drinkable [drigkabl] tap [tep] seems somehow wasted. Why people prefer to buy small amounts of water in PET bottles remains a mystery.. 1ル 3 The bottled water industry makes large profits while mystery[místri] profit(s) [prá:fat(s)] refrigerated [rifridsarèitid] shelves [felvz] <shelf consuming, large amounts of energy. Vending machines 15 and refrigerated store shelves run 24 hours a day. PET bottles require costly disposal. Bottled water is an costly [ks:stli disposal [dispóuzl developed (divelapt] ecological [:kalá:dgikl] impact [impackt] example of how industries in developed countries increase consumer choice while ignoring the ecological impact of their actions. dran 20 oftesup 00 01 mov alte obesup boog 9. 100 times moreとは, 何と比較してですか。 ggy 6. *First World 11. *tap water btorio m yd moe 4. Not only does the bottled ~, (but) it has : not onlyが文頭に来た倒置 13. PET [pét] ポリエチレンテレフタレート 18. developed country → develonin

8と10なのですが、何故過去形だとダメなのですか？わかりません。

1( )内の動詞を用いて英文を完成させなさい。総合 と Tke going on a picnic with my family these days. [like] 1. I gos 3. My sister. is. (ooklng her favorite dish for 2. The earth around the sun. [go] us now. [c0ok] usinl it now. [use] 14. You can use my dictionary; I 5. I 16. Mary not arenmed ttends. a ruler from Bob in math class yesterday. [borrow] church every Sunday. [attend 7. My father sometimes Piclhed me up when I was a child. [pick] 8. My class is esshg environmental problems this week. [discuss] Ancient peoplebelieved the earth was flat. [believe] ロ/10. Welongeed were Taujking at a joke when the teacher came in. [laugh]

下から2行目のitはなんですが？

I'm always surprised to learn of a company that doesn't edueate its て employees(in the fundamental financial realities of its industry, Employees need to understand the success or failre levels of their industry) so that they know what it is ábout their own job that really couns, ) Qf course, employees have to be willing_students who direct attention to the areas where it makes v the biggest difference) C

5行目のitはなんですか?

I'm always surprised to learn_ef a company that doesn't_edueate its v employees(in the fundamental financial realities of its industryEmployees need to understand the success or failure levels (of their industry) so that they know/what it is ábout their own job that really counts, Of coursé, employees Sv have to be willing_students who direct attention to the areas where it makes v the biggest difference) C and desirable

【至急】 現代文全然わからないので答えて欲しいです！ ⑴傍線部①とあるがこのようにいうのは何故か。 六十字以上七十字以内で述べよ。 ⑵傍線部②とはどういうことか。 八十字以上九十字以内で述べよ。 ⑶傍線部③について、筆者の「ネーションへの帰属」に対する考えを百字以上百... 続きを読む

Rアや Sト す。この漠然とした読解を改善しなくては、現代文で安定した点奏をりる 身につけていきましょう。 (ナショナリズムとは何であろうか? またネーションとは何だろうか?ナショナリズムは、近代的な現象である。歴史家たちは、こ のことをよく認識している。ネーションやナショナリズムの始発点を近代のどの時期に求めるべきかについては、後に議論しよう。それ が厳密にはどの時期であるにせよ、ネーションという共同体が、古代にすでにスタートしていたという、ナショナリストたちがしばしば 抱く主観的な思い込みは、明らかに客観的な事実に反している。 ベネディクト·アンダーソンは、近代的な現象としてのナショナリズムのあり方を直感するためには、「無名戦士の墓と碑」のことを思 N ってみればよい、と勧めている。れらの墓は、徹底して匿名的であるか、あるいは空虚である。これらの墓にだれが葬られているか、 だれも特定することはできない。ときには、墓が、意図的に空である場合すらある。このようにだれかの死を記憶するための建造物が、 始めからまったく匿名的であり、実質的には空虚であることなど、かつてはなかったことである。つまり、これは、純粋に近代的な現象 なのである。かつても、遺骸の納められていない墓というものが稀にはあった。たとえば、古代ギリシャでは、何らかの事情によって遺 骸を通常のしかたで埋葬できない人のための空の墓があったし、エジプトのファラオの墓が、どういう理由によるのか、意図的に空にな っている場合がある。心かし>でれちは、社会のなかの特別なーしたがって名のある||人物のものであり、少なくとも同時代の人々 にとっては、どの個人のためのものか特定できたはずだ。しかし>社会の一般の、しかもこれほど大量の人々の墓が、時間の流れのなか で生ずる忘却の不可抗なはたらきによらずして、最初から匿名的なものとして設置されたことなど、かつてなかった。しかも』墓碑の公 共的·儀礼的な価値は、ひとえにこの匿名性に依存しているのである。アンダーソンの指示に従って、だれかどこかのひま人が、無名戦 士の名前を発見したとか、記念碑に本物の骨を入れようと言い出したと想像してみよう。Oこれは、奇妙な見当はずれの、冒漬的ですら ある提案に聞こえてくる。これらの墓は、明らかに空であるにもかかわらず、ある感情的な色彩をともなった国民的想像力を鼓舞する。 nJV まるで、この墓が記念する人々は不在であることを条件にしてこそ、まさにそこの住民であるかのようだ

③の文を、it turns out を文頭に置いた時の書き方が分かりません

important progress/ toward identifying the mental traits/ that allow some people to accomplish their goals, / while others try hard and quit. // ® Grit, 1 it turns out, / is an essential / (and often overlooked) /part of success. // 7 Tm sure / that there isn't a single highly successful person / who hasn't depended

教えてくださいください

did (闘撃院大) boote daifgnd B次の各文の下線部には誤っている箇所が1つずつある. その番号を指摘し, 正しい形に直しな さい。 13. Did you turn off the stove in the kitchen? I can smell something to burn. T8L (桜美林大) 14. The movie was not interesting at all. I got boring and left the theater soon. being being (亜細亜大) SCbib goy 15. の After close examination, we found that the results of the survey you conducted SAG 2pojeu2ot. baaabbl. last week are very surprised. の (北里大) 16. He promised his mother that he would have his hair to cut before he went for the interview. onuon olloy (日本大) 17. Offered many canned and frozen foods, that supermarket attracts many working mothers.

英文の添削お願いします！

課題2 次の日本語をできるだけ自然な英文にしてください。 「次回のミーティングでは私たちNPOの環境活動を社会にアピールする方法について話し合いたいと思い ます」