学年

質問の種類

数学 高校生

(2)で質問があるのですが、 ST:TR=t:(1-t)は RT:TS=t:(1-t)ではダメなんでしょうか

基本 66 2直線の交点の位置ベクトル 例題 00000 四面体 OABC の辺OAの中点をP, 辺BC を2:1に内分する点をQ,辺 1:3に内分する点をR, 辺ABを1:6に内分する点をSとする。 OA= OB=6,OC = とするとき (1) OQ, OS をそれぞれà, 6, こ で表せ。 (2) 直線 PQ と直線RS が交わるとき, その交点をTとする。 このときを で表せ。 指針 (1) 内分点の位置ベクトルから求める。 (2)平面の場合 (p.50 基本例題26) と同様に, PT:TQ=s: (1−s), 基本2 ST: TR=t (1-t)として,点Tを線分PQ, 線分 SRのそれぞれの内分点ととら OT を で2通りに表す。そして, 係数比較 にもち込む。 CHART 交点の位置ベクトル 2通りに表し, 係数比較 ズー 30 UP これ 類似 3 (1) OQ 2+1 1.OB+2OC =16+ 2 3 6-> OS 05-60A+1.0B = +16 = 1+6 (2) PT:TQ=s: (1-s) とすると OT = (1-s) OP+sOQ =(1-s).+s(16+) 23 ・SC ・・・・・・ ① P Akzi R B ST: TR=t: (1-t) とすると OT (1-t) OS+tOR =(1-1)+1/+11/2 -(1-1)+(1-1)+] 4点 0, A, B, C は同じ平面上にないから ① ② より 同じ平面上にない4点 0.7 1/2(1-3)-20(1-1)/1/23=1/2(1-1)/1/25/1/1 第2式と第3式から 13.11 8 S= t= 15 これは第1式を満たす。 したがって、①から2/3+/1/36+/1/350 A(a),B(b),C(c)に対 し、次のことが成り立つ。 t> sa+to+uc =s'a+to+u'c s=s', t=t, u=u' (s, tu,s,f, u' は実数) ■ 四面体 OABC において,辺ABを1:3に内分する点を L, 辺OCを3:1に内分 する点を M, 線分 CL を3:2に内分する点をN, 線分 LM, ON の交点をPとし OA=d, OB=6,OC=C とするとき, ON, OP をそれぞれ,こで表せ。 p.125 EX 45

解決済み 回答数: 1
英語 高校生

赤い下線のところがどういう構造になっているか分からないです、教えてくださいm(_ _)m

moving from " (1) 点) There are historians and others who would like to make a neat division between "historical facts" and "values." The trouble is that values even enter into deciding what count as facts-there is a big leap involved in 'raw data" to a judgement of fact. More important, one finds that the more complex and multi-levelled the history is, and the more important the issues it raises for today, the less it is possible to sustain a fact-value division. But this by no means implies that there has simply to be a conflict of prejudices and biases, as the data are manipulated to suit one worldview or another. What it does mean is that the self of the historian is an important factor. The historian is shaped by experiences, contexts, norms, values, and beliefs. When dealing with history, especially the sort of history that is of most significance in philosophy, that shaping is bound to be relevant. As far as possible it needs to be articulated and open to discussion. The best historians are well aware of this. They are alert to many dimensions of bias and to the endless (and therefore endlessly discussable) significance of their own horizons and presuppositions. A great deal can of course be learned from those who do not share our presuppositions. Our capacity to make wise, well-supported judgements in matters of historical fact and significance can only be formed over years of discussion with others, many of whom have very different horizons from our own. It is possible to I have a 12-year-old chess champion or mathematical or musical genius, but it is unimaginable that the world's greatest expert on Socrates could be that age. The difficulty is not just one of the time to assimilate information; it is (2)

解決済み 回答数: 1