(4)でなぜウが正解なのかが納得いきません。 私はエを選択しました。 Mr.Suzuki gave up having smoked for the sake of his health.という英文が文法的にどう間違っているのか教えてください。お願いします。 解説には「gi... 続きを読む

(3) He admitted (7 make 1 having made a serious mistake. (4) Mr. Suzuki gave up (7 smoke for the sake of his health. (5) What did you do last night? QUO incl being made I having been made) Wish psed hed ind on 〈東京国際大〉 smoking I having smoked) Oh, nothing special. I spent most of the to smoke

下線部を訳す問題で、赤い所の単語が分かりませんでした。 そんな時は、どのように訳せば良いですか？

91 5 次の狩猟に関する英文を読み、以下の設問に答えよ。 (配点 60点) It's November, opening morning of deer hunting season in Wisconsin I'm in my treestand just inside the woods, /very close to open land which does not allow hunting. White-tailed deer live on the open land all year, and my treestand is just above a route they often use to escape when feeling threatened. and/A As they move I see, six white-tailed "does with a 10-point buck in the open land/ farther away, am curious:/What would they do if I shot into the ground? My gunshot echoes in the narrow valley making it difficult to pinpoint the source of the noise. After the sound settles, does burst through a gap in the woods and disappear into the bushes below my stand/ I hold my breath as the buck quarters toward me I feel lucky but also regretful in a clearing only 25 yards away. I take the shot. that my anticipated long day in the woods is over, with plenty of processing work (2) ahead. Admittedly, along with luck, my understanding of resident deer habits helped me punch my buck tag. A modern hunter with knowledge of whitetail behavior and sophisticated modern weaponry can successfully ambush deer. /That raises questions about human hunting capabilities. Do modern humans have the のうりょくこ capabilities physical and sensory of ancient hunters? Or have we lost those skills because of our reliance on technology? My short answer to both questions is yes. (3) Recent analyses from archaeological sites in Olduvai Gorge, in East Africa's 考古学 Great Rift Valley, established the capability of humans living nearly 2 million years ago to ambush "wildebeest-size prey using simple wooden spears at close range. I believe that humans today still possess the capabilities of the ancients. Those skills

https://www.yokohama-cu.ac.jp/admissions/admissions/general_selection/2023_EnglishSample.pdf どなたか答えを教えて頂けませんか🙏

動名詞の単元です。並びかえ教えてください🙇🏻

2 ( )内の語句を並べかえて、英文を完成させなさい。 下線部の動詞は適当な形に変えること。 amey quitioze na ed lliw aidT BCD 1. (admitted/the glass/the boy/break ). betioxe to tol a STW T 2. (copies of/he/make/the documents/suggested). SIRA 3. He (take/ the children/to school/offered). 4. She (questioned/refused/be/the police/by). 5. The audience (go/began/after/out/the show). RA acce JALAN 43F0RR 2 (**)* 8

動名詞の単元です。並びかえ教えてください🙇🏻

2 ( )内の語句を並べかえて、英文を完成させなさい。 下線部の動詞は適当な形に変えること。 amey quitioze na ed lliw aidT BCD 1. (admitted/the glass/the boy/break ). betioxe to tol a STW T 2. (copies of/he/make/the documents/suggested). SIRA 3. He (take/ the children/to school/offered). 4. She (questioned/refused/be/the police/by). 5. The audience (go/began/after/out/the show). RA acce JALAN 43F0RR 2 (**)* 8

解答の緑のマーカーを引いてあるところで、なんで、Mが外心となるか分からないので教えてください！🙇‍♂️

Mond 8 J 練習 △ABC の頂角 A およびその外角の二等分線が直線BC と交わる点をそれぞれ D, ③87 E とし,線分 DE の中点をM とする。このとき, 直線 MA は △ABCの外接円に 接することを証明せよ。

左の英文の内容をよく表しているものを右から一つ選ぶ問題です 教えていただきたいです🙇‍♀️

The problem with such criticism, however, is that it fails to address the clear distinction between professional skill and craft. Admitting that this difference exists is crucial. Before the 17th century, it can be argued, there was little difference between the master craftsman and the professional artist. The work of both was created for, and judged by, society as a whole. However, during the age of European expansion a class of professional artists gradually emerged. Their work was not aimed at, or designed to be under- stood by, the ordinary citizen. It was created to suit the tastes and experiences of the ruling class. The "language" they used in their paintings was the language spoken by an elite. Only the elite could "judge" a work of art. Only they could "read" it properly. For over two centuries, therefore, craft-that is, self-taught or local skills-became the poor man's art; it was not considered worthy of discussion by the rich and powerful.

第7段落の下線部ですが、訳の意味がわかりません。わかる方教えてください！！

as ys 5 6 One day, a college professor named Denis Osborne came to lecture on physics, giving Mpemba an opportunity to talk to an expert on the subject. He repeated his question, but this time he got a quite different reaction. The professor first smiled and asked, “Is it true? Have you done it?" After Mpemba la horruitnos ewenibaa admon M answered "Yes," the professor said, "I do not know, but I promise to try this experiment when I am back at my college." 7 Professor Osborne kept his word and carried out the experiment himself. He found that for temperatures up to 20°C, the time was roughly proportional to the temperature above freezing, up to a maximum of 100 minutes at 20°C. For higher temperatures, however, the time dropped dramatically, down to 40 15 minutes for water at 80°C. le 10► 700

紫マーカーのis by の繋がりが分かりません 何か省略さされてるのでしょうか？

fault, and immediately accept the blame for it by apologizing. If so, you are making a mistake. The reflex apology is just that: a reflex-an automatic, knee-jerk response, not a considered admission of guilt. This is a deeply *ingrained rule: when any inadvertent, undesired contact occurs (and to the English, almost any contact is by definition undesired), we say 'sorry'. 16 In fact, any intrusion, impingement, or imposition of any kind, however minimal or innocuous, generally requires an apology. We use the word 'sorry' as a prefix to almost any request or question: 'Sorry but do you know if this train stons at Banbury? Sorry, but is this seat free?' 'Sorry do you

全文訳お願いします！

4 20 科学 420 words Chapter 1 The recipe for making any creature is written in its DNA. So last year, when 1-1 geneticists* published the near-complete DNA sequence of the long-extinct woolly mammoth, there was much speculation about whether we could bring this giant creature back to life. 5 東京理科大学 Creating a living, breathing creature from a genome* sequence that exists only in a computer's memory is not possible right now. But someone someday is sure to try it, predicts Stephan Schuster, a molecular biologist at Pennsylvania State University and a driving force behind the mammoth genome project. So besides the mammoth, what other extinct beasts might we bring back to life? Well, 12 10 it is only going to be possible with creatures for which we can recover a complete genome Without one, there is no chance. And usually when a creature dies, the (1) - DNA in any flesh left untouched is soon destroyed as it is attacked by sunshine and bacteria. sequence. There are, however, some circumstances in which DNA can be preserved. If your 15 specimen froze to death in an icy wasteland such as Siberia, or died in a dark cave or a really dry region, for instance, then the probability of finding some intact stretches of DNA is much higher. Even in ideal conditions, though, no genetic information is likely to survive more than a million years. - so dinosaurs are out and only much younger remains are likely to yield good-quality DNA. "It's really only worth studying specimens that are less than 100,000 years old," says Schuster. The genomes of several extinct species besides the mammoth are already being sequenced, but turning these into living creatures will not be easy. "It's hard to say that something will never ever be possible," says Svante Pääbo of the Max Planck Institute 25 for Evolutionary Anthropology in Germany, "but it would require technologies so far removed from what we currently have that I cannot imagine how it would be done." But then (3) 50 years ago, who would have believed we would now be able to read the instructions for making humans, fix inherited diseases, clone mammals and be close to creating artificial life? Assuming that we will develop the necessary technology, we have 30 selected ten extinct creatures that might one day be resurrected. Our choice is based not just on practicality, but also on each animal's "charisma" - just how exciting the prospect of resurrecting these animals is. 1-3