画像横になってすみません blow「息を吹きかける」、steaming「湯気の立った」はわかったのですが、間にあるこのacrossってなんですか！？ blow acrossで繋がってるのかなーって思ったのですが辞書引いても出てきませんでした😭 よろしくお願いします

3 <英文構造> Somewhere, millions of years ago, just after learn... 同格 e fire, the primitive human was faced with a difficult technological dilemma: how to cool his piping-hot food enough to be コロン以下で dilemma の内容を説明 疑問詞 + to 不定詞 「・・・するのに十分に｣ able to eat it. Surely he must have burned his tongue enough times. He would have to find 助動詞 + have done 過去の習慣を表す would a way of eating the hot stuff. Then he must have discovered that by putting his lips together 助動詞 have done discovered の目的語 and blowing across) a steaming bowl of mammoth stew, the food magically cooled). Why? He S hadn't a clue, but it worked. FOCUS 助動詞 PE he must have burned his tongue : 過去の経験や完了の意味を含む助動詞 must + have done 「･･･ したに違いない」 の形→ 「彼(=原 始人)は舌をやけどしたに違いない」。 (→重要構文 31 て考えてす 間 この死行前は何 he must have discovered that ~ the food magically cooled: inc must have discovered の目的語は that 節 (that cooled)。 that を代名詞の「それ」 と訳さないよ うに注意しよう。 that節の主語･述語は the food (magically) cooled ｢食べ物が (魔法のように) 冷 めた｣。 その前の by putting 〜は「・・･することによって」 を意味する前置詞 by + 動名詞の表現。 buman puc すべき ... enough to be : how to cool は疑問詞 + to 不定詞 「どのように~すべきか〜の l.2 how to cool 仕方」の表現。 「であるほど十分に」 を意味し cool を修飾。 ｢そ (→ 重要構文 10 enough to be Hold wasob 313860 れを食べられるくらい十分に冷ます」 となる。 → 重要構文 11 ivillization l.3 find a way of eating the hot stuff : 同格を表す of でつながっている→ 「….する方法」と訳す。 RENSE) Vocabulary Check NDOW 訳 どこかで、何百万年も前、火を使うことを覚えた直後、原始人は、ある困難な技術的なジレンマ [板挟み ] に直面していた。 すなわち, ものすごく熱い食べ物を食べることができるくらいに冷ます方法である。 彼 はきっと何回となく舌をやけどしたに違いない。 彼は熱い物を食べる方法を見つけなければならなかった。 そんなとき彼は、 唇をすぼめて湯気の立つマンモスのシチューの入ったお椀に息を吹きかけることで、食べ 物が魔法のように冷めることを発見したに違いない。なぜなのか。 彼にはまったく見当がつかなかったが, その方法はうまくいったのである。 vody tavsundw) snsig 「原始の、原始的な」 ■ primitive □technological 「技術的な｣ □ burn MG SRI 文重 「~をやけどする」 Vocabulary Plust ~ in svol orwalqoo1 somewhere 「どこかで」 ■ be faced with 「〜に直面している」 □ put ~ together 「~をあわせる」 「手がかり」 ■ clue

この段落の最後の文です！「それが食べたものなら何でも食べることになるだろう」っていう訳なんですけど、これって「それが何を食べようとも」って訳すことってできますか？それとも名詞節と副詞節みたいな区別でやっちゃいけないことなんでしょうか？

5 Other researchers on the U.S. east coast have found similar results (in examining micro-plastics). The in doing ｢~するときに」 examine ｢~を調査する」 proved [that the micro-plastics contain poisonous metals and other dangerous chemicals (that can be passe <先行詞+関係代名詞(主格)> food chain [ up the food chain to humans)]. The European researchers (also) found micro-plastics in farm-raised oysters (追加) farm-raised 「養殖の｣ pass up to... 「~を (上の)... に渡す」の受動態 Eat one of those oysters and you'll be eating whatever: has consumed. (3): whatever ｢~するものは何でも」 6 Rochman says that her colleagues have found micro-plastics in seafood (sold in markets in the U.S. and

まるで囲んであるbeingってなんの役割ですか？？

outue money as possible. ② In the United States, wealth was also acquired by stealing, but the real victim was not other human beings but poor Mother Earth and her creatures. The Indians were driven out, for they had never realized the potential riches of their country. け待 ② アメ その真の 物であっ れたが

this poses a threat to agriculture and the food chain and to human health. agricultureの前のtoって何の役割で置かれてますか？

アとイの答えを教えてください！

424034 [1] Reading Comprehension sion tout carros 次の英文を読んで,あとの問いに答えなさい。 • Vote S This is Mark again. My parents have been telling me to be "(a) the first penguin" since VI 98891 07 Down DOSTAL & OUT of vis esoted ( I was born. “The first penguin" is the penguin that dives into the sea first to get food. There are predators like seals and killer whales that want to eat us, so it is very scary to go first. ( ① ) someone has to do it for everyone to survive. ( ② ) one brave penguin Jordw. dives into the sea. (③), the others follow after confirming their hero is still alive. In your human world, the expression “the first penguin" is used for a person who tries out new things without fear. Well, (b) (お別れの時間だね). Did you enjoy our stories? What have you found interesting about our behavior? noullut vount 971 1. 次の文は下線部(a) の the first penguin について説明しています。ア,イの( )に適 切な日本語を入れなさい。 bales to nomet att 「ファーストペンギン」とは, コウテイペンギンの社会では ( を指します。これにならって, 人間界では,(イ)人のことを「ファーストペンギ アペンギンのこと ン」と呼びます。 ア. イ.

カッコ内の構文は関係代名詞で作られたものでしょうか？ The big question is (what effect these plastics have on humans.)

この文章の4行目にある、because they would harm whatever bacterial life forms might be present on the planet の文構造についてなのですが、might の前にあるはずの関係代名詞の主格whi... 続きを読む

次の文章を読んで、 問1~4に答えなさい。 The establishment of a colony on Mars has been a dream for decades. Inevitably some people have objected to the idea of colonizing Mars on both ideological and practical grounds. Some object to humans living on Mars because they would harm whatever bacterial life forms might be present on the planet. Others oppose Mars settlements because they disagree with the idea of using the Red Planet as a "backup" in case the Earth is destroyed. Those in favor of colonizing Mars, however, look to spread the human race beyond our single planet. The practical considerations of surviving long term on a world without a breathable atmosphere, no surface water, exposure to radiation, and extremes of heat and cold all have to be addressed first. Mars colonists could survive in domed cities, extracting and recycling resources from the Martian environment. However, a more interesting plan for the settlement of the Red Planet involves a process called terraforming, turning the dangerous environ- ment of Mars into something resembling Earth. Billions of years ago, Mars was more like Earth, with a thick atmosphere as well as oceans and rivers of surface water. The planet may well have had complex life forms. However, sometime in the distant past, Mars lost its (A ). When Mars found itself without the protection of that field, solar wind relentlessly stripped it of its atmosphere, quickly turning the planet into the frozen desert it currently is. While a number of schemes exist to restore Mars' atmosphere, creating a runaway greenhouse process that would raise its temperature, NASA and some academic researchers recently came up with a simple way to achieve the process naturally. The idea involves the creation of an electromagnetic shield between Mars and the Sun to protect the Red Planet from solar wind. Without the solar wind stripping it away, the atmosphere of Mars would gradually become thicker. Soon the temperature on the Martian surface would become high enough to release the trapped ( B ) at the poles, accelerating the (C). Water ice at the poles would melt, giving Mars back some measure of its oceans and rivers. All humans would have to do is introduce

the opponents of~~の英文 develop は「成長する」と「開発する」という意味があって 初見で訳した時、「卵の潜在能力を人間を開発するために破壊する」と思ったのですが 正しくは「人間に成長する卵の潜在能力を破壊する」でした。 これは自動詞と他動詞の違... 続きを読む

コーン作製やて では、卵細胞が普通の細胞を作り出すのに利用される。 クローニングの反対 このことは殺人であると主張するが,それはヒトに成長する卵の可能 らん を破壊するという理由からだ。 AIAT それに反対する 201

英検準1級のライティングの添削をお願いします。

Date No. 英検ライティング③ Topic: Should rich people be required to pay higher taxes? Points: Government funding, Equality, Wort incentive, Competitiveness. I with the idea. I have two reasons to support my opinion. agree First of all, all people should be equal. These days, the number of people who don't work are being increased. Therefore, to protect their human rights, the government should give money to them. As a result, they don't feel uncomfortable to live. Second of all, the government could control the money. If rich people pay higher tax, the goverment could use their money to support many easily operate money in hy people and also, they can economy is being recession. In conclusion, I hope that rich people will pay many tax to protect poor people and to improve our economy.

この文の第二段落のamid calls for ~のcallsは、名詞でしょうか？前置詞のamidとcalls forのつながりが、なぜこのような訳になるのか理解できません。このcalls が名詞だと仮定して直訳すると、管理下において大規模に火を放つことを求める要求の最中に... 続きを読む

王 jon 【目標解答時間 15分 配点 37点 15 次の英文を読み, 下記の設問 (A~D) に答えなさい。 Fire is "a good servant but a bad master." In my house, in summer, I smell the air for the faintest hint of smoke as keenly as any horse or dog or kangaroo. I watch for columns of smoke, visualising again and again how fire could rush( 1 )the hill towards us. But if you are philosophical about it, fire is a natural 5 part of the Australian environment and has been for millions of years. Living with the threat of fire in the bush, or in the wild, is like living with sharks when diving, or with snakes while walking, or with traffic accidents on a city street. The idea that we should remove every shark from the sea, or every snake from the land, and control- burn, or deliberately set fire, to prevent any risk of 10 bushfires is a recipe for making the environment even worse. As Phil Koperberg, head of the New South Wales Fire Brigades, said ( 2 ) the Sydney bushfires of 1994, amid calls for massive control burning, “Do you want to concrete over all the bush? If you choose to live in the bush, you choose to accept the risk. f It is often claimed that some Austratian plants and animals have actually adapted to fire, evidence of an extraordinarily long period (millions of years before human arrival) during which fire has been more significant in the Australian environment than it has been on any other continent, but this is probably not strictly true. Many plants have adapted to the environment in 20 ways that also happen to be valuable in times of fire. ( 3 ), animals have adapted to a variety of different habitats, and can therefore survive during different periods of vegetation regrowth after a fire (or after, say, a cyclone, a flood, or just a tree falling in a forest). A tree that has the ability to regenerate from roots or lower trunk when the 25 upper tree dies as a result of being broken off in a storm, or falls over, rotten to the core, will also be able to respond when the upper part is killed by a fire. Seeds adapted to long hot droughts, and requiring a combination of heat and water for germination", will also find a fire, if followed by rain, a good stimulus for growing new plants. There does appear to be evidence that chemicals in 30 smoke can help promote growth in plants, but whether this is a direct 可能性があるかを 何度も が続いているのだ。 森林地帯, ダイビングのときにサメ, そやカンガルーにも負けな の匂いを嗅ぐ。 私は,どのよ 暮らすようなものである。 海 しき主人である」( れば, 火事はオーストラリア >> のヘビを取り除くべきだと 意図的に火を放つべきだ , 1994年のシドニー ている真っ只中 と言った。 入れるこ