学年

質問の種類

英語 高校生

答え合ってますでしょうか😭😭

7. Could humans live on indefinitely were it not for ( を無期限に 1 some 2 little 8. The secretary provided me with a great ( 1 deal 9. ( 2 much ) age-related diseases? few slem of bad ow ) number of people visited the museum last month. 1 The 2 Much 可算 <宮崎大) (3) no ) of information. ) 3 many of y④number <東京工科大) aj2919jni S a number of A Facia 4 Many 〈関西外国語大〉 も両方修飾 few文にあれないX ④ a little of y ) to me. 3 A ) people to the party, but only a few came. ・可算も不可算 行くさんの 〈関西外国語大 2 lots of of) 10. We invited ( 1 much ry I read in to 興味を与える aldness 11. The story I read in today's English class was really ( 1 interesting 2 interested③ interest being interested alde) oldiezog 12. Jenny was extremely ( I in the fact that no one had ever been to the island. ISLUG interested in A A107 2 interested (大岡 be 1 interests 13. The speech this afternoon was so ( 退屈させる ⑩boring 2 to be boring 14. "How does Amy like college?" 3 interesting 4 interest wol <愛知> 〈大東文化大 〉 ) that I fell asleep. Inoizastong gables? E 3 bore 19blero (8) oldsbien 4 bored zelq() borobianos D ) living alone, but she's doing oing extremely well in her courses." "She is a little ( 〈大山 退屈させられる (1 bored 2 boring 3 surprised ④surprising sthoval 〈京都産業大 >

解決済み 回答数: 1
英語 中学生

大問4の(1)についてです この英文は、なぜin the convenience storeではなくatなのでしょうか? お菓子を買っているのはコンビニの中なのに、inは使ってはいけないのですか?

剛門 「とても美しい」 は副詞 very を形容詞 beautiful の前に置き, very beaut とする。 これが red roses 「赤いバラ」 を修飾している。 (2)When you make a speech, please speak more clearly. 訳 スピーチをするときは、もっとはっきりと話してください。 形容詞+ly で終わる副詞には more を付ける 「はっきり話す」 は speak clearly として,副詞 cle を動詞 speak のあとに置く。 「もっとはっきり」 は clearly の前に副詞 more を置く。 4 (1) Mari bought some snacks at the convenience store. 訳 マリはコンビニでいくらかのお菓子を買いま 数えられる名詞を修飾する形容詞 buy (bought) 「買う」の目的語 snack 「お菓子」 は数えられ 詞なので, 「いくらかのお菓子」 は some snacks と複数形にする。 (2)That small white cat often comes to my house in the evening. 訳 あの小さな白いネコは,夕方よく私の家に来ます。 形容詞の語順 「小さな白いネコ」の名詞の前に置かれる形容詞の語順は,日本語では 「白い小さ 「コ」でもよいが, 英語では「大小→色→名詞」のように決まっている。 また, often 「しばしば」 に頻度を表す副詞は、ふつう一般動詞の前に置く。

解決済み 回答数: 1
英語 高校生

以前画像3枚目の様に修飾限定予告のthatというものを習ったので今回もその形なのかと思い、それらのと入れずに訳してしまったのですがこのthoseの識別は文脈判断ということでしょうか? 教えて頂きたいです。よろしくお願いいたします。

実理 K The starting point for today's *meritocracy, of course, is the idea that intelligence exists and can be measured, like weight or strength or fluency in French. The most obvious difference between intelligence and these other traits is that all the others are presumably changeable. If someone weighs too much, he can go on a その人 →Heyで受けるのが一般的 5 diet; if he's weak, he can lift weights; if he wants to learn French, he can take a course. But in principle he can't change his intelligence. There is another important difference 原則として MV between intelligence and other traits. Height and weight and speed and strength and サフィス体例 関係性が強い文がくる even conversational fluency are real things; there's no doubt about what's being 間違いなん measured. Intelligence is a much murkier concept. Some people are generally (2) m2 Vogue 10 smarter than others, and some are obviously talented in specific ways; they're chess 天才 S masters, math *prodigies. But can the factors that make one person seem quicker than another be measured precisely, like height and weight? Can we confidently say that one person is 10 percent smarter than another, in the same way we can say he's 10 へんて、いつだっ S percent faster in the hundred-yard dash? And can we be confident that two thirds of 櫂へん 言いかえ 15 all people have IQs within one standard deviation of the norm that is, between 90 ように and 110 - - as we can be sure that two thirds of all people have heights within one standard deviation of the norm for height? Yes, they can, and yes, we can. besure least, are the answers that the IQ part of the meritocracy rests on. Those, at (3)-

解決済み 回答数: 2