学年

質問の種類

英語 高校生

(7)の答えが、if以下、つまりインドがWTOの知的財産条約を批准すること、となってるのですが、ifの前の内容、インドの特許法がWTOの基準を満たすこと…というのを答えにしたらダメですか?

( 6 ) lives while helping maintain his own high standard of living. Hamied, 30 who earned his doctorate in chemistry from the University of Cambridge, Considers the AIDS battle part of a broader campaign to maintain India's loose patent regime. India's patent laws are supposed to meet World Trade Organization standards if the country ratifies the WTO's intellectual property treaty. Hamied says that could make his people very helpless against 35 *profiteering drug companies and India has an estimated 4 million HIV-positive Hamied has the fight of his life ahead on his own turf. (7 cases. (注) pharmaceutical : 製薬の oligopoly:寡占(少数の大企業が市場を支配している状態) shareholder:株主 profiteering:暴利をむさぼる (茨城大) 下線部(1)はどういうことか, 40字以内の日本語で具体的に述べなさい。 問2 下線部2)に含まれないものを, 次のア~エから1つ選びなさい。 ア.株主の利益を優先する製薬会社の主張を抑える。 間1 イ.エイズ混合薬を廉価で販売する。 ウ、抗エイズ薬の特許を申請する。 エ,命を救う薬品の寡占を許すべきでないと表明する。 問3 下線部(3)を日本語に訳しなさい。 問4 下線部(4)を日本語に訳しなさい。 問5 空所( 5 )に入れるのに最も適当なものを,次のア~エから1つ選びなさ い。 ng イ.regardless of ウ. thanks to 間6 空所( 6 )に入れるのに最も適当なものを, 次のア~エから1つ選びなさ ア. because of エ、 according to い。 ウ.iberates 下線部7)の内容を25字以内の日本語で述べなさい。 ア. loses イ. deprives エ, sustains 問7

回答募集中 回答数: 0
英語 中学生

答えがない高校の過去問です。 回答確認のために教えてほしいです。

【1】 次の英文を読んで, 下の各設問に答えなさい。 These days, many people say that *agriculture is very important. We have( ① ) many kinds of things, such as rice, fruits and vegetables for a long time. Through agriculture, a lot of foods are produced, so we are able to have food every day. Agriculture is necessary for our lives in many ways. の In Japan today, more and more people are thinking about agriculture. People want to get safe food for their health. Some people ask, “Where do these carrots come from?” or “Do the farmers use *agricultural chemicals?” So, many people like to buy fruits and vegetables produced near their homes.It is called chisanchisyo in Japanese. In the United States, they have the *movement called *Community Supported Agriculture (CSA).. People give some money to the farmers( 3) in their *local area. They can get fruits or vegetables from the farmers *instead of going to the stores. In other words, *consumers support the farmers in their own community. 4) Chisanchisyo and CSA have good points for both consumers and farmers, For consumers, frst, they can know where the fruits and vegetables were produced. Second, those products are fresh and taste delicious because ⑤ thev [farms/ are/ in/ stores / carried / to/ from」 a short time.*In addition, consumers can choose the farmers who don't use agricultural chemicals. For farmers, first, they can understand consumers' needs quickly. Second, farmers can make a lot of **profit because they can cut back on *distribution cost. They can sell ther products which they cannot send to supermarkets. 6 So these kinds [ better / a chance for / give consumers / of movements/ can / getting」 products. Farmers are careful about the safety of food: Agricutural chemicals are used to *protect firuits and vegetables from *insect pests, but (O) too much chemicals is sometimes bad for people. So, some farmers are trying to produce fruits and vegetables( agricultural chemicals. Instead of agricultural chemicals, they use sonme kinds of insects and special plants. For example, some farmers use *ladybugs. They like to eat *plant lice. Plant lice are insect pests of vegetables. Iffarmers do not take action, 'many vegetables will be eaten by them. So the farmers hope that ladybugs will eat many plant lice. *companion-plants. They are plants which help to reduce insect pests and make vegetables better. Green onion is one plant that reduces plant lice on tomatoes. Plant lice don't like the strong smell of green onion, so farmers protect vegetables by planting them near tomatoes. As a result, farmers don't need to use any agricultural chemicals. Farmers are trying to produce vegetables which don't use agricultural chemicals. To get safe and healthy foods, consunmers and farmers need to help each other. Also, we are nowthinking about using not only natural ways but also new technology such as robots. Other farmers use

回答募集中 回答数: 0
英語 高校生

この教科書のレベルはどのくらいですか教えください この教科書でどのくらいのレベルの大学まで対応できますか?

1 On 10 February 2009, at a height of about 800 kilometers above Siberia, an American satellite collided the first such height [háit] satellite [séetalait] collide(d) [kaláid(id)] with an old Russian satellite. It was collision [kaligan] collision in the history of space development. As a result, fragment(s) [fráegmant(s)) debris [dabri:] more than 1,000 fragments of debris were scattered into space. 2 The image above shows the vast amount of space debris in orbit around Earth. Approximately 22,000 vast [váest] orbit [5:rbat] approximately [aprá:ksamatli) objects larger than 10 centimeters across are floating around Earth. Of these, about 16,000 are from known 10 considering [kansidarig) artificial [a:rtafijal] currently [ks:rantli] operation [a:paréifon] Considering that there are only about 1,000 artificial satellites currently in operation, the amount of Sources. space debris is astonishing. This space debris is not only due to the collision of satellites. For example, when rockets reach space, they s 15 leave behind surplus engines and fuel tanks. These objects remain in orbit as space debris. In addition, surplus s5:rplas] there are tools that astronauts have dropped while tool(s) [t:l(z)) astronaut(s) [astrand:t(s) aluminum [ala:manom per|par] working outside. Even a one-centimeter aluminum ball. when orbiting at a speed of around 10 kilometers per 0 bullet [bálat] second, is far more powerful than a bullet from a gun. gun [gán]

回答募集中 回答数: 0
英語 高校生

見辛かったらすみませんが、問2の英作文の添削をしていただきたいです🤲

2015年度 英語 13 They should not have to lose their livelihoods. Secondlv. although I agree 次の英文は、英語のディベートの授業での対話です。この対話を読み,下の問い に答えなさい。 with Keiko that climate change is a serious problem, I think air travel is a much less damaging source of carbon pollution than, for example, burnimg MR. ROBERTS: Good morning, everybody. Today we have the first of our Coal. We should address these more serious causes first. Finally, the most student debates. The topic this morning is air travel, and the argument is. 法 important reason is the issue of freedom. People in a democracy expect the “Domestic air travel in Japan should be discouraged." Keiko will first argue right to travel as they wish. It has made our lives more convenient and in favor of the proposal and Junko will speak against. Over to you, Keiko. created more opportunities for everyone. We should not reduce our quality of life. Thank you for listening. KEIKO: Good morning, everybody. I am going to speak today in favor of the proposal. Limitless air travel inside Japan is a luxury that we can no longer MR. ROBERTS: Thank you to our two speakers. Now, are there any afford. The main reason is that it is extremely damaging to the questions from the audience? environment. The carbon gases produced by aircraft are very high and are a 頭人 proven cause of global warming. Therefore, we should try and reduce air 問1 次の(1)~(5)の文について, 本文の内容と一致するものには○.一致しないも travel as much as possible to protect the environment, not only for Japan but のには×を,それぞれ解答欄に記入しなさい。 also for the whole world. Secondly, air travel is actually unnecessary within the four islands of Japan. Now, while I appreciate that travel to Okinawa is (1) Keiko's main reason for opposing domestic air travel is the damage it a different case, there are efficient train services throughout Japan that are causes to the environment. h fast and environmentally friendly. These make an excellent alternative to air (2) Keiko thinks that air travel is cheap and efficient. flights, so there is really no need to use airplanes in most cases. Finally, (3) Keiko recommends that people travel between Okinawa and mainland there is an economic reason. Air travel is expensive for passengers because Japan by ship. the price of fuel keeps increasing, but airline companies are still struggling (4) Junko thinks that climate change is not an important problem. to make profits. Moreover, regional airports often cannot attract enough (5) Junko thinks that a lot of jobs will be lost if air travel is reduced. customers, and, overall, the industry is not cost-effective, It's time to admit that air travel is too damaging and expensive to be sustainable. Thank you. 問2 次の質問に英語で答えなさい。 Which of the two speakers do you more agree with? Give at least one JUNKO: Thank you, Keiko. I am going to disagree with the proposal for three reason for your answer. (解答欄:13.8cm×4行) reasons. Firstly, I think there is a strong economic case to support flying. Many jobs depend on air travel, not just the pilots and cabin staff, but also people who work in airports or for airlines, or who rely on fast transport.

回答募集中 回答数: 0
英語 高校生

見辛かったらすみませんが、問2の英作文の添削をしていただきたいです🤲

2015年度 英語 13 They should not have to lose their livelihoods. Secondlv. although I agree 次の英文は、英語のディベートの授業での対話です。この対話を読み,下の問い に答えなさい。 with Keiko that climate change is a serious problem, I think air travel is a much less damaging source of carbon pollution than, for example, burnimg MR. ROBERTS: Good morning, everybody. Today we have the first of our Coal. We should address these more serious causes first. Finally, the most student debates. The topic this morning is air travel, and the argument is. 法 important reason is the issue of freedom. People in a democracy expect the “Domestic air travel in Japan should be discouraged." Keiko will first argue right to travel as they wish. It has made our lives more convenient and in favor of the proposal and Junko will speak against. Over to you, Keiko. created more opportunities for everyone. We should not reduce our quality of life. Thank you for listening. KEIKO: Good morning, everybody. I am going to speak today in favor of the proposal. Limitless air travel inside Japan is a luxury that we can no longer MR. ROBERTS: Thank you to our two speakers. Now, are there any afford. The main reason is that it is extremely damaging to the questions from the audience? environment. The carbon gases produced by aircraft are very high and are a 頭人 proven cause of global warming. Therefore, we should try and reduce air 問1 次の(1)~(5)の文について, 本文の内容と一致するものには○.一致しないも travel as much as possible to protect the environment, not only for Japan but のには×を,それぞれ解答欄に記入しなさい。 also for the whole world. Secondly, air travel is actually unnecessary within the four islands of Japan. Now, while I appreciate that travel to Okinawa is (1) Keiko's main reason for opposing domestic air travel is the damage it a different case, there are efficient train services throughout Japan that are causes to the environment. h fast and environmentally friendly. These make an excellent alternative to air (2) Keiko thinks that air travel is cheap and efficient. flights, so there is really no need to use airplanes in most cases. Finally, (3) Keiko recommends that people travel between Okinawa and mainland there is an economic reason. Air travel is expensive for passengers because Japan by ship. the price of fuel keeps increasing, but airline companies are still struggling (4) Junko thinks that climate change is not an important problem. to make profits. Moreover, regional airports often cannot attract enough (5) Junko thinks that a lot of jobs will be lost if air travel is reduced. customers, and, overall, the industry is not cost-effective, It's time to admit that air travel is too damaging and expensive to be sustainable. Thank you. 問2 次の質問に英語で答えなさい。 Which of the two speakers do you more agree with? Give at least one JUNKO: Thank you, Keiko. I am going to disagree with the proposal for three reason for your answer. (解答欄:13.8cm×4行) reasons. Firstly, I think there is a strong economic case to support flying. Many jobs depend on air travel, not just the pilots and cabin staff, but also people who work in airports or for airlines, or who rely on fast transport.

回答募集中 回答数: 0