学年

質問の種類

日本史 高校生

黄色いQの答えを教えて欲しいです!お願いします🙇‍♀️

く盡途方の力協に!ば さよ盟聯 總勧告書を探し 我が代表堂々退場す 四十二野一票棄權一 代イマンスを はいよ!十四日午前十時四十九日本時間午後六時四十九 された、ある の をなすこころあり、 ニア ダニネズエラ、カナダ 日本のみで一 ニューグ二十四日に関する十四の動含む 時三十分(日本時間午後七時三 によってされた がれた、その 一日五分(日本時間午後九時 に にされた 十分 である。 (日本時間午後九時三十代表 し、一時四十六 話し にそのま [ジュネーク員二十四日 あの拍手が起った その代してくだ日本人間より 支那側勸告受諾 第六項の權利強調 上から、イーマンス三 シュー二十四つ した。 にすることしょって日本が instance shum MARAS イーマンス 十六 BIRCH.CZ/ZZW 44/ www.d これにようか受けることになっ けふ閣議で正式に 脱退方針を決定 聯盟離脱の最終手 なるかも知れない 1 にした が € あって、代 一 WHERE DOP ES? PRENT ... 第五項( けふ Da bick clearly 記事の写真で一番上の人 新聞記事 の日本の世論の状況を 時 当 、 決を報じる 記事の見出しの文言から 物は日本全権の松岡洋右。 『東京朝日新聞』 1933年2月25日) 8 国際連盟の対日勧告案可 読み取ってみよう。 ぜんけん まつおかようすけ 新聞社などの共同宣言 ほぜん 満洲の政治的安定は、極東の平和を維持す ・東洋平和の保全を自 る絶対の条件である。 己の崇高なる使命と信じ、且つそこに最大の利 害を有する日本が、国民を挙げて満洲国を支援 するの決意をなしたことは、まことに理の当然 も満洲国の厳 といわねばならない。 そんりつ あや 然たる存立を危うするが如き解決案は、たとひ 如何なる事情、如何なる背景に於いて提起さ じゅだく あら る 間はず、断じて受諾すべきものに非ざる ことを、日本言論機関の名に於いて茲に明確に 声明するものである。 昭和七年十二月十九日 日本電報通信社 報知新聞社 東京日日新聞社 東京朝日新聞社 中外商業新報社 大阪毎日新聞社 国民新聞社 読売新聞社 大阪朝日新聞社 都新聞社 時事新報社 新聞連合社 外百甘社 (『東京朝日新聞』 一九三二年十二月十九日) すうこう いか きょくとう こと いやし

回答募集中 回答数: 0
英語 高校生

至急!!私立大学看護学部の過去問です。答えがないため、回答を作って欲しいです!!科目は英語です。

問題番号に対応 効とする。 うち受験票お researchers at the University of Veterinary Medicine in Vienna, Austria, have found. Dogs won't give food to a human, even if that person gave them some food first, and that they would help other dogs that had helped them before. Therefore, the team Previous studies have shown that dogs can recognize cooperative and uncooperative humans, "reciprocal altruism"- that is, doing a good thing in return to a human who had given expected to find that their test subjects would put these two things together and show To start, the team trained a group of 37 dogs to press a button which would activate a them food first. *enclosure with the dispenser, while one of (2) two humans was in a separate enclosure with the button. One would press the button to food dispenser. Then, they put each dog in an would not. Each dog was paired with both humans in give food to the dog, and (4) unhelpful one. turn. After that, the researchers switched over the button and the dispenser. They expected that the dogs would press the button to give food to the helpful human but not to the though the dogs did press the button, they did it just as often when either human had the food dispenser, and even when no human was there at all. "In these kinds of studies (5) [perform / to / dogs / which/ trained / are in a particular behavior for an experiment, they will usually do the behavior a few times as they have simply learned the association between the behavior and getting a reward, and it may be enjoyable for them to do the behavior," said Jim McGetrick, a PhD student at the University of Veterinary Medicine in Vienna who led the research. 身を正しく が本冊子 1番 2 次の英文を読んで下の設問に答えなさい。 (3) giving us some food? Are they a combination of reasons. "It is (6) Why wouldn't our best pals want to help us out by secretly all bad boys and girls? McGetrick believes there is possible that the dogs did not understand enough about the task to realize that only one of the humans was providing them with food," he said. It could also be because they didn't fully understand the button and dispenser system, or because they were too focused on the food to notice whether a particular human was pressing the button or not. "Having said all that, even if they did completely understand the task and were fully attentive to the actions of the humans, there is still a good possibility that they wouldn't have given food back in return," he added. "It could be that providing food to a dog as they do not typically do that in everyday life." After all, humans are the ones who human is something very strange for (7) already have food, from a dog's perspective. why would your pet need to worry about (8) making sure you have enough? However, all the humans in the study were people the dogs didn't know. "It is quite 5

回答募集中 回答数: 0