学年

質問の種類

TOEIC・英語 大学生・専門学校生・社会人

訳して欲しいです至急ですお願いします🙏

s not something you Want 9 eir horme5・ It* 8 。 tak eople out of th 村 K you are ga ing 1 other than definitely needing to 9" 叶 dose 』 do lightIy , for 「@d rter to taKe shelter・ 1f is a plum, radiation・ Tn S0TTe accldents, IE 15 DTP indows 2 d or puf人 relea5e, people shelter In hou5e5 witl nt いい rhead2/" 58yS・ the puff has passed overheady Milligan 58Y : NeceSsarY changeS? In Japan, even the wake of the deadIy earthquake and ME d i ins25 We left local infrastructure ruin5, thousands of people た 抽 ta from the vicinity of the nuclear POWeT plant within 24 hourS・ MM 3 Milligan, dt least, does not anticipate anY chan9ges to the「Uu e5 ー し from27 less0nS learned from Fukushimaa ro nuclear DOWe「 plants stemmin9 now Provide adequate? ion for public| ww e Can See i ゞThe planning ZOneS in place There IS nothing W cate that We would need to expand、 zio る le health and safety,′ She SayS・ Fukushima meltdowns that would indi the_.plume eXxDOSU「 pathway“" an aircra介 mi ar USS Ronald Rea9 gase5?1 On ah dioactIVe noble e aircraft carrier found ほぼ: s for civilianS, after miles from the plant| e case of Fukushirma, the carrier? sailed into the plume of escaping「す March 12. More than 100 miles aWay, sailors on th jevels high enough to exceed the EPA'Sデ guideline zo roughly 10 hours of exposure. "They went up to 130 and we were St reading a direct gamma shine33 of 0.6 milirem pe 因 nour” explained the NRCS Stephen Trautman on March 12, according t9 s34. Garmma「ayS d「e among the most energetic 一 and tnerefore forms of radiation. Nevertheless, in th transcript dangerous tO health 一 2。 Tn the end, the question i5 One of risk. No one has died from radioactiwe contamination as a result of the Fukushima meltdowns, at least not yeW And it may prove impossible to disentangle3* any extra cancers due 0 Fukushima S radiation, from those that happen as a result of all the othW carcinogenic37 factors a DerSOn is exposed to in the modern world froW diet to smoke. But it remai i jns unclear how far radioactive emissions3 might reach In WW Case of a another 0 央0 1 Fukushima. "At that point its from We ? Another five miles? Another 10 miles? Do you 8 a Sense?” ask 1] Sked NRC chairman Gregory Jaczko on March 12, as he t his staff anal yzed computer modeling of a catastrophic meltdown す

回答募集中 回答数: 0
英語 高校生

このテキスト何だか分かりますか? 分かる方がいたら教えて欲しいです。(´θ`llll)

1 隊 次の英文を読み、問いに答えなさい。(50 ) O 2 me of the most fascinating parts of any child's development, for its parente ar * さい other *onlookers、is the fapl growth of language. inguistゅhave paid 4 good deal attention to the aquisiton of language by children during the past to 2 particulaw一一the resti in fact に seek much f ーー mo now any Coure s hnguistics is likely to offer you at 1計 人 ay helping of research 包申 theories about how (nt happensl (9)There is no Shorta eyof unsolved roblem8。 parent ought to know about. | there are some agreed conclusions that anY for parents to t robably that there 5 no need know exactIy what to er speakers and (3)(3p! The most important one il their language to their children. Every child seems to 10 order to get efficient at languagey Simply. by ohserving oth / are / guessing / rules / the / they)- COこい4 dehiberate attempt by parents to ie ]anguage system is tikely to be at best yaste of time and。 gr mite possib unnecessary source of friction between Par arent and child. The fact is that eVen < are largely in the dark about how children learn ther 1anguage when 辻 come 15 to details, so no parent is jikely to know enough about the child's Way of lean be able to guide it by teaching. Having picked out this one general point, it is hard to select others io mention here because there are 50 manツ equally good candidates 一 the two equally normal, bright children may start speaking at different ages, 20 that children may know' adult forms but use different ones themselves and On. Moreover, (9共 would be wrong tO conclude, from my earlier remarks uselessneSs each 3 to children, that MS is nothing tha

解決済み 回答数: 1