学年

質問の種類

英語 高校生

(a)に入るのが、attendingなのですが、なぜでしょうか? 教えてください!

その番号を記入せよ。 なんて attend ing (24点) This weekend, I had the pleasure of ( a ) my dear friend Dara Lynn's baby shower. Over a lunch of clam chowder, sirloin steak, and chocolate cake, I caught up (b) two of her friends, Amanda and Andrea, from law school. They were both lawyers now, and the subject of networking and responding to requests from people who were looking for career advice ( c ) up. Like many successful professionals, the two women were happy to help those who reached out to them for their professional opinion and guidance. However, they had a hard ( d ) believing how many of those people failed to thank them for their time afterward. It is unbelievable that anyone would reach out to a person who is obviously quite busy witha demanding job in addition to ( e )a parent and home-owner, ask that person to give up their time, and then not follow up with a simple thank you. If you are asking someone for a ( f ), you should let them know you appreciate that person's effort. Amanda told the story ofa young man, a few years out of law school, with (g) she had spent more than an hour giving advice. Shenoted he was not writing down any of the names of people or organizations she had suggested he contact. Instead of a thank-you note the following day, she received an email from him asking her ( h ) send him the names of the people she had mentioned. I was shocked that someone would be so “self-important"” and show such a ( i )

回答募集中 回答数: 0
英語 高校生

見辛かったらすみませんが、問2の英作文の添削をしていただきたいです🤲

2015年度 英語 13 They should not have to lose their livelihoods. Secondlv. although I agree 次の英文は、英語のディベートの授業での対話です。この対話を読み,下の問い に答えなさい。 with Keiko that climate change is a serious problem, I think air travel is a much less damaging source of carbon pollution than, for example, burnimg MR. ROBERTS: Good morning, everybody. Today we have the first of our Coal. We should address these more serious causes first. Finally, the most student debates. The topic this morning is air travel, and the argument is. 法 important reason is the issue of freedom. People in a democracy expect the “Domestic air travel in Japan should be discouraged." Keiko will first argue right to travel as they wish. It has made our lives more convenient and in favor of the proposal and Junko will speak against. Over to you, Keiko. created more opportunities for everyone. We should not reduce our quality of life. Thank you for listening. KEIKO: Good morning, everybody. I am going to speak today in favor of the proposal. Limitless air travel inside Japan is a luxury that we can no longer MR. ROBERTS: Thank you to our two speakers. Now, are there any afford. The main reason is that it is extremely damaging to the questions from the audience? environment. The carbon gases produced by aircraft are very high and are a 頭人 proven cause of global warming. Therefore, we should try and reduce air 問1 次の(1)~(5)の文について, 本文の内容と一致するものには○.一致しないも travel as much as possible to protect the environment, not only for Japan but のには×を,それぞれ解答欄に記入しなさい。 also for the whole world. Secondly, air travel is actually unnecessary within the four islands of Japan. Now, while I appreciate that travel to Okinawa is (1) Keiko's main reason for opposing domestic air travel is the damage it a different case, there are efficient train services throughout Japan that are causes to the environment. h fast and environmentally friendly. These make an excellent alternative to air (2) Keiko thinks that air travel is cheap and efficient. flights, so there is really no need to use airplanes in most cases. Finally, (3) Keiko recommends that people travel between Okinawa and mainland there is an economic reason. Air travel is expensive for passengers because Japan by ship. the price of fuel keeps increasing, but airline companies are still struggling (4) Junko thinks that climate change is not an important problem. to make profits. Moreover, regional airports often cannot attract enough (5) Junko thinks that a lot of jobs will be lost if air travel is reduced. customers, and, overall, the industry is not cost-effective, It's time to admit that air travel is too damaging and expensive to be sustainable. Thank you. 問2 次の質問に英語で答えなさい。 Which of the two speakers do you more agree with? Give at least one JUNKO: Thank you, Keiko. I am going to disagree with the proposal for three reason for your answer. (解答欄:13.8cm×4行) reasons. Firstly, I think there is a strong economic case to support flying. Many jobs depend on air travel, not just the pilots and cabin staff, but also people who work in airports or for airlines, or who rely on fast transport.

回答募集中 回答数: 0