学年

質問の種類

英語 高校生

明日までの英語の課題の答えがわかりません💦 だれか教えて下さい、お願いします💦💦🙏

13-16 を完 A ch] 1 (3) その男性は仕事を探していました。 The man was [] (4) リックはきっとその困難を克服するでしょう。 Rick will surely get over a job. the difficulty. get along with/look for / get over / put on ] ⑤ [ ]内の語句を参考にして、 日本語の意味になる英文を書きなさい。 (1) その建物は、あるドイツ人建築家によってデザインされました。 [design, architect ] The building (2) その洞窟では何が見つかりましたか。 [ be found, cave ] (3) 窓はすべて閉めておいてください。 [ keep, all ] (4) 『源氏物語』 は, 1920年代に英語に翻訳されて以来、多くの国々で読まれてきた。 [The Tale of Genji, translate ] (日本女子大) 英訳ポイント (2) 「何が見つかりましたか」 → 「何が見つけられましたか」と考える。 (3) 「窓はすべて閉めて おく」→「すべての窓を閉まった状態にしておく」と考える。 6 下線部 (1)~(3)の日本語を英語にし、 (4) (5) の質問に英語で答えなさい。 One popular American old-fashioned tradition is to give your partner a diamond engagement ring when you propose marriage. This is partly because diamonds are the hardest natural substance on Earth, so a diamond ring symbolizes how strong and never-ending your love is. The main reason, however, is that (1) ダイアモンドの指 輪が大きな広告キャンペーンで長年売り込まれました (be promoted) These ad campaigns 5 were from the largest diamond company in the world, De Beers. In the early 20th century, sales of diamonds in the U.S. were declining, so (2) デビアスは広告会社を雇って それを変えようとしました。 In 1948, the ad company started the “A Diamond Is Forever” campaign, which appeared in many fashion magazines. According to those ads, when you decide to get married (3) あなたはダイアモンドの婚約指輪をパートナーに贈るべき10 です。 Now, giving such a ring is popular not only in the U.S. but around the world. engagement ring: 婚約指輪 substance : 物質 symbolize: 表す De Beers: デビアス ad company: 広告会社 (1) (2) (4) Why does a diamond ring symbolize a love that lasts forever? (5) When were sales of diamonds declining in the U.S.? C

回答募集中 回答数: 0
英語 高校生

mainstreamⅢ chapter18 章末問題 解答教えてください!

6 Chapter 18 Comprehension a. On the basis of Gurdon's research, Yamanaka revealed that specialized cells from a mature Choose the appropriate answer. body can be transformed into iPS cells. frog. b. Gurdon placed cells from the skin of mice into an unfertilized egg cell of a c. Yamanaka took cells from the blood of mice and transformed them into a baby. d. The only difference between Gurdon's and Yamanaka's experiments was what cells they used. e. Organ rejection will no longer be a problem because it has become possible to develop organs from the patients' own cells. f. iPS cells will soon make it possible to cure all types of diseases. g. Yamanaka admits that iPS technology has done harm in some cases. h. Even as a scientist Professor Yamanaka believed that his mother saw his father's ghost. i. Professor Yamanaka has never thought of giving up research. found iPS ce j. What Professor Yamanaka wanted to say in the speech was what seems unfortunate at first may turn out to be fortunate in the end. not e mes B Choose the most appropriate main theme. a. John Gurdon and Shinya Yamanaka won the Nobel Prize because they helped each other for 40 years to create iPS cells. Chapter 18 | Minis SO 15 b. We should be careful about new technology because it takes time to put it into use and it can do harm. 24 c. Professor Yamanaka has experienced challenges in his life but they were also opportunities, one of which led to the Nobel Prize.

回答募集中 回答数: 0
英語 中学生

どこを抜き出して答えればいいのか分からないので答えをお願いします🙇‍♀️もし出来れば解説もお願いします🙏

次の英文を読み、以下の問いに答えなさい。 Cow. Chicken. Grass. Which two are in the same group? Your answer depends on where you were born and raised. T fedt af gnofed For a long time, *research psychologists have had an idea that East Asians and Westerners think about the world in different ways. There was not enough scientific *evidence to support this idea until recently. In the past 15 years, however, researchers have learned a lot about different thinking styles and the cultural differences that produce them. The story begins in 1972, when *Liang-Hwang Chiu, a professor of *educational psychology at *Indiana University, tested more than 200 Chinese and 300 American children. He showed some cards to each child. Each card had pictures of three things. One card, for example, showed a cow, a chicken, and grass. Chiu asked the children to say which two things were in the same group. Most of the American children picked the chicken and cow. They explained the reason by saying that "both are animals." Most of the Chinese children, however, put the cow and grass together because "cows eat grass." solib - People didn't think Chiu's study was very important in the years after its *publication because $*psychological scientists at that time paid little attention to cultural differences. In the 1990s, however, *cross-cultural psychology became 2"hot" and Chiu's findings were paid attention to again. 3 Researchers at the University of Michigan did Chiu's study again by testing college students from China, Taiwan, and the United States. Without using pictures, the researchers gave the students with and asked them to say which two three words shampoo, hair, and conditioner, for example 20 were in the same group. The Americans were more likely than the Chinese to say that shampoo and conditioner go together because they're both hair care goods. The Chinese were more likely to say that shampoo and hair go together because "shampoo washes and cleans hair." Why do East Asians and Westerners think differently? Most researchers believe the answer can be Taplapo 77 Step A Step B Step C

回答募集中 回答数: 0