学年

質問の種類

英語 高校生

あまり理解できなかったので翻訳お願いしたいです。

Lesson 1 B A few days later, when the terror caused by the executions had died ; thought they remembered down, some of the animals remembered that the Sixth Commandment decreed: ‘No animal shall kill any othe or animal.' And though no one cared to mention it in the hearing of the nia. or the dogs, it was felt that the killings which had taken place did no square with this. Clover asked Benjamin to read her the Sixth Commandment, and when Benjamin, as usual, said that he refused to meddle in such matters, she fetched Muriel. Muriel read the Commandment for her. It ran: ‘No animal shall kill any other animal without cause." Somehow or other the last two words had slipped out of the animals’ memory. But they saw now that the Commandment had not been violated: for clearly there was good reason for killing the traitors who had leagued themselves with Snowball. There, com Throughout that year the animals worked even harder than they had worked in the previous year. To rebuild the windmill, with walls twice as 、thick as before, and to finish it by the appointed date, together with the 2 2 regular work of the farm, was a tremendous labour. There were times when it seemed to the animals that they worked longer hours and fed no 5 better than they had done in Jones's day. he is lord of them the bare min (Animal Farm) he rest he keeps for himself. Our labou yet there is notone of us tha 注 square: 両立する、矛盾しない meddle: 干渉する bare skin. 問1 下線部の~⑤の働きを下の1~7から選びなさい。 (各2点) (Animal I'rin) 間2 英文中には準動詞が8つ含まれている。各準動詞を抜き出し、かつその準動詞の働きを下 の1~7から選びなさい。 (抜き出し各2点、 働き各1点) 1. 主語 2. 動詞の目的語 3. 前置詞の目的語 4. 補語 を下 5. 名詞修飾 6. 副詞の働き 7. 同格 (抜き出し各2点 州

解決済み 回答数: 1
英語 高校生

スタディサプリでは前置詞プラス関係代名詞は、whichとwhomの後は、文が完全でないといけないと習いました。 なのに、なんで使えるんでしょうか? また、allの後は、thatを使うのでは、ないのでしょうか?

293 As a result of working at the newspaper, I met my future h 114 ● Part 1 文法 加( のwhen @ which ③ that ④ whow )was also working there. h 第10章 関係詞 293~298 ● 115 294 Last winter I went to Hong Kong, ( ロ expected. のwhen wasn't od 2where it 3where wasn't ) as warm 293 非制限用法の who odo who-uied s od c blot 国本 >「人」が先行詞の主格関係代名詞 who を入れる。 ト非制限用法で that は用いられないので③thatは不可。(→Point 079 の下の説明の 題のの) P国 asn't の which it wasn't わ は bthhih T80n準 294 関係副詞の非制限用法 (セン) ート oin>関係副詞の where と when は, 非制限用法で用いられることがある。 why と how には非制限用法はない。 「Last winter I went to Hong Kong. /2 1nT 110 It wasn't as warm in Hong Kong as I had expected. hot したがって, 関係代名詞を使えば in which it wasn't となるが,その in which を関係副詞 where で言いかえた② where it wasn't が正解。 >where it wasn't の it は寒暖の it。 ) became doctors. 295 She had three sons, all ( ロ 0of whom 3who 200 2which の of which O w 296 He lent me two books, neither of ( )I have read. m Othat @which ③ what の them 6 50 thotnsw) owT9gBg o lond edi nO 標準 all of whom >A of whom/ A of which の形をセットにして節の頭に置き,非制限用 法で用いることがある。 She had three sons. (All of them became doctors. them を whom にし、all of whom を節の頭に置いたもの。 295 w oeC 9d af ad 02091 301 Point 080 om 山 J2of ynM co ) made us forty minuts 297 We got stuck in a traffic jam, ( ロ for the meeting. O which 2 that ③it ④as 296 , neither of which >「He lent me two books. の lI have read neither of them. 考え方は問題295 と同じ。them を which にし, neither of which を節の 頭に置いたもの。 標準 io )I found a waste of time. Itied to solve the problem, ( ロ Owhat 2 which ③ that when 303 daidw Oa aer Point 非制限用法で用いる which の注意すべき用法 297 前文の文内容が先行詞一which w 5ns s今ty t 関 関係代名詞 whichは非制限用法の場合に限って、 前文全体またはその一 部の文内容を先行詞として用いることがある。本問の which は, 前文 体の内容を先行詞とする, 主格関係代名詞。 の け (代以人1そ sdodoY 298 前文の一部の文内容が先行詞-which 人doirtw 診分開番主 させJC1コ中の 本さ 0metokoY O 0 1限 JS 合の行 which は,前文のto solve the problem の内容を先行詞として、 目作 で用いられている( 297)。 なお、 found は「find O C 「OがCだとわ る」の用法であり; その目的語が which になっている。 本日 さりささりっお ] ケのるで 293 その新聞社で働いた結果として、私は未来の夫に出会ったが, 彼もやはりそこで 294 この前の冬,私は香港に出かけたが,そこは私が思っていたほど暖かくはなかった たのだった。 295 彼女には3人の息子がいたが,全員が医者になった。 296 彼は私に本を2冊貸してくれたが、私はそのどちらも読んでいない。 297 交通渋滞に巻き込まれてしまい, それで私たちは会議に40分遅れてしまった。 298 私はその問題を解こうとしたが,それは時間のむだだとわかつた。 293 294 295 296 297 298

回答募集中 回答数: 0
英語 高校生

穴埋め問題です。教えてください。よろしくお願いします。

く練習問題 2>次の( )内に、up, down, out, off, awayのいずれかを入れなさい。 ]内はヒント) (復習)(I 1. It was thoughtless of him to do such a foolish thing. Mary began to look ( on him. [Maryは彼を軽蔑し始めた) 2. Toshiko is fed ( )with 2-hour ride on the train to the office every day. [電車に2時間も乗って通勤するのはうんざりだ] 3. Iworked all day long today, so l'm tired ( )and want to lie ( [疲れきった、だから横になりたい] 4. I can't catch who is singing the song. Willyou please turn the radio ( [ラジオのボリューム上げる?下げる?] 5. We enjoyed talking very much. We talked ( )for several hours. [数時間しゃべり続けた) 6. Tom worked so hard that he could pay ( ) his debts. [借金完済) 7. When Bill turned ( ), the party was over. He said that a traffic jam made him too late. [Bill が現れた時] 8. The snow was so deep that school was called ( ) for the rest of the week. [授業が中止された] 9. After she enjoyed playing the video game, Jill put ( [Jill は明かりを消して寝た] ) the light and went to bed. 10. This room is a mess. First of all, put ( ) those things. [この部屋は散らかっているね。まず最初に、そこにある物を片付けなさい。] 11. The French Revolution broke ( )in 1789. [フランス革命は 1789年に起こった。(勃発した。)(災い·戦争などが起こるとき は、くすぶっていたものが、 から れ出 くるイメージ)] 12. The bomb blew( ) the wall to bits.(blow: 爆破する) [その爆弾は壁を粉々に爆破した。]

解決済み 回答数: 1
英語 高校生

BとDを教えてほしいです

Suppose you were asked to participate in a blind taste-test of five different brands of strawberry jam. After tasting all of the jams, but before being asked to rate their quality, you spend a couple of minutes ( I 1 ) down your reasons for liking and disliking each jam. Then you rate each one on a scale from 1 to 9. How accurate would your ratings be, assuming we judged accuracy by comparing your ratings with those given bya panel of experts assembled by Consumer Reports magazine? When psychologists Timothy Wilson and Jonathan Schooler conducted this experiment with college students as their subjects, they found that the ratings the students gave to the jams had almost no resemblance to , those given by the experts. 2 They should have been able to tell which ones were good and which ones were not the jams varied widely in quality and included those ranked 1st, 11th, 24th, 32nd, and 44th best out of 45 that Consumer Reports had reviewed. Did the students have no taste for jam? Did their preferences differ from the experts'? Not at all. In a separate condition of the experiment, rather than writing the reasons they liked and disliked each jam, each subject wrote about something entirely ( 4 ): their reasons for choosing their college major. The subjects then rated the jams, and despite not having thought about them at all after tasting them, they made ratings that were much closer to those of the experts.

未解決 回答数: 0