学年

質問の種類

英語 高校生

長文どなたか教えてほしいです。 不安なんで…

ロ には 唱】 火のスピーチ放入を読んで、下紀の癌に和えなさい。 なおの人た家 本文の後に注があります。 As an old science reporter Tnd myselfin a diHfenlt position todai 0 Tighrtech executives on the topic of artifcial inteligence or AI Fnn surecoll 際。 far more about AI than 1 do. Stil. 1 think I can contribute some historical perspectHVe. Thave been writing science columns since many cf you were kids ( Z ) Hmrote my frst column on AT back in 1963。 Tm( イ ) because when T say *artifcial intelhgence"Tm talking about something that Tm not sure really exists. Those of you who have read my articlealand books on the subject know that Tbehieve in what we call imealk AT' and that 1 aminotieal onvineed by what we call srongALy oto Whats the difference? Lets say we program a computer to say Rhank youl in situations where real people would feel grateful. 1 think we could make eally sound like a thankful person。 Tm sure that such a machine and tuned so well that it could fool me were blindfolded But here's the question: Did the program actually feel thankf me? Or did the team who wrote the program thank me? Was According to the strong AL approach, the computer really couldibe ex According to weak AI, iCs just a machine making sounds。 Tim reminded of an old classic comedyy routine imagined a future world in which computers made 。 people really worried about that in the 1960s. In this ima handled every decision that humans didmt like making. One fmring other computers. So the comedy routine consists of a conm ose computer ecplaine to worker computer why itmust be fred The reason this comedy routine is interesting js not just bec because it expresses fears about strong AI。 ICs int 50 years ago- That's right。 a halfrcentury ago。 people uman decisions.They thoughtit might happ8mi the future.( ウ ).the predicted robotdominant、 Im my opinion, no matter how impressed none of us realiy believes that truly selfraware di exist. Tknow youre ll experts on AI but ileEs rogram, no matter how sophisticeted,( 王 ) marmyi jn or reject God. or say “Tlove you and mean it W cperatipg the machine-or who wrote the Dio As a real. thinking person who has obaerved tk research for many yearsu Tbelieve there will alaya bela efieve that no matter how sophisticated ATbeoon as a thinking person。T also know that 1 can be wi the future of science. Perhaps momeday those of yo

未解決 回答数: 1
英語 高校生

この文章の、緑の蛍光ペンで線を引いたすぐ前のtheir(分かりにくくてすみません)って何の代用ですか? その前までに出ていた複数形がlower-grade employeeしかないのですが、これじゃないような気がして分からなくなりました😥 教えて下さい。

【 2】 次の英文を読んで, 設問に答えよ。 ① While we may not face the threat of captivity* ike our animal c6unterpart, humans omneny 語 and follow systeme 6hat restrict some oFour individual choiees to beneft 6 を the greater 60o9) We vote to reate ws, epact* oo放Racts。 and agree to be gainfuly* employed [beeause we recognize that 0 間 js dhaoglButiwhat happens when our abilty to Geonally recognize the benefts ofthese restrictions conflicte with anGnetinetive avereion* to \ 侍 1g The deewe to whichwe are able to strike a balanee of control in our ive)has a 人 ebearing on our health. ② Adecadesong research project known as the Whitehall Studies, conducted by Pofsssor MichaelMarmotoFUniversity Colege 欄" provides a powerful demonstration ofhow or 3) ofchoice cam し our wellbeing. Beginning in 1967, researchers followed more 郊 than 10.000 British ciwiTserYante aged 20 to 64 comparing 隊2 outcomes ofemployees トド 8ofthe hardilarie Doo dn季向et (9 cetedackat4 (he studiew found that(thougHlthe higherpayingjobacame with greater Preesurer employeee in the loweat pay grade。 sueh ae doormen。 were thyee 0mes more ikely todie』 mary* heart disease.ibanthe highest-grade workers were) ④ Part this waslbecmued lvermade employees wae( アァ ) 1ikely to smgke and be ・ merweight and( イ )Hikely to exereiee regulariy。 We | 9 [BC caientfte aceounted fr the dfRreneee in amokinge oh and exereie Ne 1owestrgrade employees were still twice as jikely to die from heart disease. Though the higher jncome that comes with being at the top ofthe Iadder cbviowgly enhaneeer the potential tr centlm ones jity this im the(6o PPetion for the poorer health of the lowergrude Mb Even employees from the secohd-highest grade jncluding doctors。 lawyers ad Coneidered welofP by societys standards, were at notably higher risk rade (

回答募集中 回答数: 0