最後の文の関係代名詞thatは何を指しているのでしょうか？教えて頂きたいです。よろしくお願いいたします。

→ Butがくる。 Indeed, this tendency is found often enough that it suggests a principle: とばしよみ we skim. 当てはまる。 And the better we are at something, the more likely we are to skim. This is true not 初見演奏 only in subjects like reading but in other fields, like music. Musical sight-reading is 楽語 the ability to play music from a printed score for the first time without the benefit o practice. Good sight readers don't read music note by note; they scan for familia 注 patterns and for cues (to those patterns.) Indeed, good sight readers seem to proces おんぷ B 1つずつ A groups of notes as a single perceptual unit. To use a metaphor: they see constellation 5) individual stars. (6) V This is what allows them to play with the speed an luidity that other musicians must practice to achieve. VK Viもある。 t これによって彼らは んになる

仮定法の問題です。教えてください。よろしくお願いします🙇

REVIEW 下の日本語を参考に、( )に適当な1語を入れなさい。 0 if 1 ( ) you, I ( → If it had not rained yesterday, we ( ) accept the offer. )( 3 ( ) taken a walk in the park. > you come earlier, you could have seen her. A good jumper ( 6 i ( ) it ( 6 He suggested that she ( ③ My father talks ( ) leap across the ditch. } snowing today. } alone. ) if he ( ) ( everything. 8 If it ( } for music, life would be dull. ● 私があなたなら、その申し出を受け入れるだろう。 昨日雨が降っていなければ、公園で散歩すること ができたのに. 君がもっと早く来ていれば、 彼女に会えただろうに、 ● 跳躍の得意な人なら、 その溝を飛び越せるでしょう. 6 今日雪が降っていればいいのになあ. ● 彼は、彼女が一人で行くように提案した。 父はまるで何でも知っているかのように話す。 ● 音楽がなければ、 人生は退屈だろう. 〈仮定法過去 現在の事実と違うこと> 〈仮定法過去完了: 過去の事実と違うこと> <if の省略 = if you had come earlier....> < if-節の代わりとなる表現> <願望 : 「(今)~であればいいのに」> 〈 仮定法現在 > <仮定法を使った慣用表現: 「まるで~ であるかのように」> <仮定法を使った慣用表現: But for [Without]> (1

This means that there is a lot of work to be done over the next several months to bring product concept to form. 訳: このスケジュールからすると、商品コンセプト... 続きを読む

49行目についてなのですがhealthy enoughを十分健康と捉えてしまったのですが和訳がほどほどに健康となっていました。なぜそのように捉えたのか分からないので教えて頂きたいです。よろしくお願いいたします。

45 distribution was valid; all the rest had to be thrown ou the IQ scores now fall into a bell curve mainly because that is where the original English and American *psychometricians thought they should fall. But suppose they'd started out with different preconceptions. Suppose they believed that "intelligence" was something like "health": some people were weak and some were strong, but most people were "healthy enough." Their bodies may have been shaped differently, but one 50 type couldn't be called healthier than another. In that case, the distribution of IQ scores would have been very different.

以前画像3枚目の様に修飾限定予告のthatというものを習ったので今回もその形なのかと思い、それらのと入れずに訳してしまったのですがこのthoseの識別は文脈判断ということでしょうか？ 教えて頂きたいです。よろしくお願いいたします。

実理 K The starting point for today's *meritocracy, of course, is the idea that intelligence exists and can be measured, like weight or strength or fluency in French. The most obvious difference between intelligence and these other traits is that all the others are presumably changeable. If someone weighs too much, he can go on a その人 →Heyで受けるのが一般的 5 diet; if he's weak, he can lift weights; if he wants to learn French, he can take a course. But in principle he can't change his intelligence. There is another important difference 原則として MV between intelligence and other traits. Height and weight and speed and strength and サフィス体例 関係性が強い文がくる even conversational fluency are real things; there's no doubt about what's being 間違いなん measured. Intelligence is a much murkier concept. Some people are generally (2) m2 Vogue 10 smarter than others, and some are obviously talented in specific ways; they're chess 天才 S masters, math *prodigies. But can the factors that make one person seem quicker than another be measured precisely, like height and weight? Can we confidently say that one person is 10 percent smarter than another, in the same way we can say he's 10 へんて、いつだっ S percent faster in the hundred-yard dash? And can we be confident that two thirds of 櫂へん 言いかえ 15 all people have IQs within one standard deviation of the norm that is, between 90 ように and 110 - - as we can be sure that two thirds of all people have heights within one standard deviation of the norm for height? Yes, they can, and yes, we can. besure least, are the answers that the IQ part of the meritocracy rests on. Those, at (3)-

一生分かりません。教えてください。フォローします。

Part 5 Incomplete Sentences A word or phrase is missing in each of the sentences. Select the best answer to complete each sentence. 15. This winter has been one of the coldest we. (A) are having (C) will have 16. I have had the same math teacher (A) by (C) since 17. By the time he reached home, he (A) would be (C) had been 18.1 in years. (B) had (D) have had two years now. (B) after (D) for soaked to the skin. (B) was being (D) has been (A) will try to get hold of Peter for over a week now. (B) have been trying (C) had tried 19. Yesterday, I came across a book which I (D) will be trying (A) been looking for (C) was looking for since I left New York. (B) looked for (D) had been looking for

高二英語 ⑧ 答えは1です。4と1で迷いました。解説していただきたいです。よろしくお願いします🤲

possible answers to this, one is poetic and a little sad, while the others are far more practical. The first concerns the English scientist, Alan Turing. This brilliant man is ( ⑧) to be the father of modern computing. It is in no (⑨) part thanks to him that World War Two ended in 1945 and not two or three years (①), for it was he who

長文のI（私）がmiyazakiのことなんですけど、I wasn't angryで本当に怒ってないことはわかるんですが、They were expressing their anger から起こる表現はしてることが分かるから、3の問題は間違っていて、Fではないんですか？

In London, I live うけいれる money. No gallery accepted my paintings. My street artist friends and I thought it was cool to look angry. They 表現 were expressing their anger at social injustice, and their anger was real. But I was from まったくない an ordinary family living an ordinary life. I wasn't angry at all. I was in London for two years, but still I wasn't a famous artist. I decided I had to find a different way of expressing myself.

Known for its high-quality portraits and portfolio that includes several Boston mayors and other high-profile Bostonians, as well as its ... 続きを読む

カッコで囲んだとこの英文の1つ目のandからの訳がどうして2枚目のようになるのか教えてください。 2枚目のどんな疑問が重要か〜の次のとこからです

ample practices varied across time and place. The truth is that we about what preliterate societies knew or believed. But they left behind *. evidence of their attention to the movements of the Sun and the phases of the Moon. And we can be sure that whatever questions they asked of the heavens were very different from those that motivate space exploration today. (A) rotic othe In reality, the difference between ancient and modern knowledge systems is more qualitative than quantitative; it is not about how much is known, but about what questions are important and about the acceptable ways of asking and answering those questions. And while we may not easily be able to slip between our modern worldview and those of others, we can nonetheless attempt to do so by asking not what ancient people knew about the world, but what their questions were when they looked at it. If we do this in the case of Mars, examining a few of the earliest known examples from around the world, we can see how sky knowledge was considered important to the functioning of the state whether it was *astrological knowledge in the service of good governance, or knowledge of bloodlines and relationships with the gods and other sky entities, which was used (B) - verdd