学年

質問の種類

法学 大学生・専門学校生・社会人

教えてください🙇‍♀️

ⅡI 以下の問いに答えなさい。 解答は、記述用の解答用紙に記すこと。 なお、 解答は読みやすい文章で書くこと。 X (21歳の大学生男子、身長170センチ、体重65キロ)は、 神戸市東灘区岡本駅前の路上において、 A (当時57歳、身長160センチ体重75キロ)に対して、 その左顔面をげ んこつで2回るなどの暴行を加えて転倒させた。 Aはその際に頭部を地面に打ち付け、病院に搬送されたが脳挫傷等により死亡した。 本件の状況は以下の通りであった。 Aは当日、午後7時過ぎから飲酒店で酒を飲み、 店内でも「馬鹿野郎」と大声で怒鳴るなどし、 午後8時過ぎに退店した。 Xは午後8時過ぎころ、アルバイト先から自宅に帰る ために、 自転車で摂津本山駅前の車道を東から西に向かって進行していた。 そうしたところ、対面から徒歩で通行してきたAが両手を広げて歩道から飛び出し、 X の前に立ち ふさがって因縁をつけてきた。 Aは、Xの右肩あたりに自分の肩や胸を3回くらいぶつけたり、 Xの首元につかみかかったりしようとした。 Aは奇声を発していたのでXはかか わりたくないと思い、Aから離れて自転車に乗ってその場を立ち去った。 AはXに向けて「この野郎、ぶっ殺すぞ」と叫んだ。 金 Xはいったん自宅に戻ったが、翌日の朝食を買い忘れたことを思い出し、 午後9時半ころ、 もう一度岡本駅近くのコンビニに向かった。そうしたところ、Aが20メートル離れた 地点から「てめえ、見付けたぞ、この野郎、くそがき、ぶっ殺してやる。」と大声で怒鳴りながらXの方に向かってきた。AはXの襟首をつかみ、Xを殴ったり、足をけったりしてき た。そこでXはAの肩を2度小突いて道路の端に追いやったのち、A がさらに向かってきたので、 Aの顔面を2度こぶしで殴った。 そうしたところ、Aは路上に転倒して後頭部 を打ち付けて、その後Xが呼んだ救急車によって病院に搬送されたが死亡した。 XはAが路上に転倒したのちはAに一切攻撃を加えておらず、 すぐに周囲に対して119番通 報をするように依頼したことを、近くを通りかかった目撃者のWが証言している。 なお、Aの死因について、 法医学者のK医師は、Xによる暴行により路上に転倒して後頭部を打ち付けたことで生じた歴坐傷、急性硬膜下血腫を主な原因として死亡したもの と認められると判断した。 Xの罪責を論ぜよ。 刑法 35条 法令又は正当な業務による行為は、罰しない。 * 東京地判平成23年10月24日の事案を参照した。 36条 急迫不正の侵害に対して、自己又は他人の権利を防衛するため、やむを得ずにした行為は、罰しない。 2項防衛の程度を超えた行為は、情状により、その刑を減軽し、又は免除することができる。 50点 37条 自己又は他人の生命、身体、自由又は財産に対する現在の危難を避けるため、やむを得ずにした行為は、これによって生じた害が避けようとした害の程度を超えなかっ た場合に限り、罰しない。ただし、その程度を超えた行為は、情状により、 その刑を減軽し、又は免除することができる。 第204条人の身体を傷害した者は、15年以下の懲役又は50万円以下の罰金に処する。 顔面なぐる 第205条 身体を傷害し、 よって人を死亡させた者は、3年以上の有期懲役に処する。 脳挫傷等で死亡 第208条 暴行を加えた者が人を傷害するに至らなかったときは、2年以下の懲役若しくは30万円以下の罰金又は拘留若しくは科料に処する。

回答募集中 回答数: 0
英語 高校生

これといてください。至急です お願いします 英語分かるかた

2010 解答用紙を6/1(木)に提出 解説は英語でします。 【1】 次の英文を読んで、後の設問に答えよ。 (配点 50) A few years ago, a certain famous university in Japan asked a unique question as its entrance examination in English. The question was this: Write a reply in English to a junior high school student who doesn't like studying. He says he has no intention of going abroad, so he doesn't think he needs to study English. Nor does he want to get a job in which the knowledge of math or science is required. He, therefore, insists that he cannot understand the reason he is forced every day to study subjects he is not interested in. As an entrance examination, it's not very difficult to write an answer to this question. (2) you take it seriously, however, it touches on such a profound aspect of human nature that it is worth thinking about. Fundamentally, why do you have to study? What is learning for? Would you still like to study even if there were no schools or examinations in the world? In my opinion, it is possible to answer such questions from a practical and essential point of view. First, it is not rare for anyone to find changes in their own preferences or desires over time. Sometimes we find ourselves possessing no interest in what we thought to be precious before. Sometimes we are surprised to realize that what we thought to be of little value is so important. So it is quite hard, especially for young people, to predict actually what one will want in the future, say, ten years from now. That's why it is highly desirable for students to prepare for their future by increasing their knowledge and improving their intelligence. Whatever job one may get, it is quite (4) that knowledge or intelligence gets in the way. This can be demonstrated partly by many adults confessing that they should have studied harder. ( 5 ), it's only while one is young that one has a good memory and can absorb and retain a vivid impression of what one has learned. Next, I would like to talk about a more subtle viewpoint. Essentially, no human beings can be satisfied with what they already have, and everyone has, at 1921 the bottom of their heart, the desire for a better existence. Please do not interpret (67 INT this only in terms of materialism or religious belief. Of course, food, clothing. and housing are important. Still, ( 7 ). Also, in the present age, it is difficulí to feel there is anything in the belief that God will come to help you have a better existence some day. Even if all of your basic needs are met, without one important thing, you cannot feel that your life is meaningful. This one thing is the ambition to improve yourself. When you learn something you didn't know before, you will surely feel the satisfaction that no other element in life can give. In this sense, learning will enable you to broaden your world, giving you the joy of knowing. In short, learning is an important way to make your own life richer. (A) 下線 (1) (3) を和訳せよ。 (B) 空所 (2) ( 5 )に入れるのに最も適切なものを、それぞれ次のア~エ の中から1つずつ選び、 その記号を記せ。 (2) 7 Because If (5) 7 For example In conclusion Though In addition What is worse (C) 空所 (4) に入れるのに最も適切な 同じ段落の中から抜き出して、 解答欄に記入せよ。 下線部)が表す内容を、 本文に即して70字以内の日本語で説明せよ。 1931 1. Unless

回答募集中 回答数: 0
英語 高校生

英文がわからないです心の優しい方、英文の解き方を教えて欲しいです🙇‍♀️

35 15 20 signatures in business. However, no one used fingerprints in crime work until the late In ancient times, people used fingerprints to identify people. They also used them as 1880s. Three men, working in three different areas of the world, made this possible. (1) The first man who collected a large number of fingerprints was William Herschel. He worked for the British government in India. He took fingerprints when people (7) official papers. For many years, he collected the same people's fingerprints several times. He made an important discovery. Fingerprints do not change over time. At about the same time, a Scottish doctor in Japan began to study fingerprints. Henry Faulds was looking at ancient Japanese pottery* one day when he noticed small It occurred to him that the lines were 2,000-year-old fingerprints. Faulds wondered, "Are fingerprints unique to each person?" He began to take fingerprints of all his friends, co-workers, and students at his medical school. Each print was (). He also wondered, "Can you change your fingerprints?” shaved the fingerprints off his fingers with a razor to find out. Would they grow back lines on the pots. (2) He the same? They did. One day, there was a theft in Faulds's medical school. Some alcohol was missing. Faulds found fingerprints on the bottle. He compared the fingerprints to the ones in his records, and he found a match. The thief was one of his medical students. By examining fingerprints, Faulds solved the crime. Both Herschel and Faulds collected fingerprints, but there was a problem. It was very difficult to use their collections to identify a specific fingerprint. Francis Galton in England made it easier. He noticed common patterns in fingerprints. He used these to help classify fingerprints. These features, called "Galton details," made it easier for police to search through fingerprint records. The system is still in use today. When 25 police find a fingerprint, they look at the Galton details. Then they search for other fingerprints with similar features. (4) Like Faulds, Galton believed that each person had a unique fingerprint. According to Galton, the chance of two people with the same fingerprint was 1 in 64 billion. Even the fingerprints of identical twins are ( ). Fingerprints were the perfect tool to 30 identify criminals. For mo than 100 years, no one found two people with the same prints. Then, in 2004, terrorists (I) a crime in Madrid, Spain. Police in Madrid found a fingerprint. They used computers to search databases of fingerprint records all over the world. Three fingerprint experts agreed that a man on the West Coast of the United States was one of the criminals. Police arrested him, but the experts were wrong. The man was innocent. Another man was (). Amazingly, the two men who were 6,000 5 10 136 Lesson 日本大学 470 words 22 (3) 23 024 25 26

回答募集中 回答数: 0