学年

質問の種類

世界史 高校生

2枚目にある(5)がわからないです💦 どなたか教えていただきたいです!お願い致します🙇🏻

Bさんのメモと生徒の会話 [メモ] テーマ「第二次世界大戦において日米関係はどのように変化した?」 ○ 年表 関連するできごと 1940年 1941年 9月 4月 7月 H 1945年 8月 10月 11月 20 12 BDG PHEX 1942年 6月 1944 年 7月 12月 4月 7月 8月6日 8月8日 8月9日 8月14日 9月2日 WARAKSTASJO 八頼した。 LA) 日本、北部フランス領インドシナを占領、 日独伊三国同盟の締結 →日米交渉開始 ( 1941年~) 日ソ中立条約 日本、南部フランス領インドシナを占領 AJ+KORN 日18 AME →アメリカ、 在米日本資産を凍結・日本への石油輸出を禁止 ARRE |大西洋憲章発表 |東条英機内閣成立 アメリカ、日本にハル=ノートを提示 日本、イギリス領マレー半島とアメリカ領ハワイを奇襲攻撃 →両国に宣戦し、 太平洋戦争の開始 ミッドウェー海戦 アメリカ軍、サイパン島に上陸 ヤルタ会談 アメリカ、沖縄本島に上陸 沖縄 ポツダム宣言を発表 広島に原子爆弾が投下 ソ連、日本に宣戦 アメリカ、長崎に原子爆弾投下 ポツダム宣言を受諾 日本、連合国への降伏文書に調印 担当まで優先 AJA ○ 資料1 ポツダム宣言に対する日本側の反応 (1945年) KERESE # 3/1 10: L.TEVE ******# ST330 @ ²2: A 18+ 豊田副武軍令部総長 「いずれ本宣言は世間に伝わることになると思うが、・・・・・・ この宣言 を不都合だという大号令を発することが必要だと思う。」 東郷茂徳外務大臣「これ〔ポツダム宣言] を拒否するような意思表示をする場合には、 重大な結果を引きおこす恐れがある。 なお戦争終末については、(え)側との交渉は 断絶したわけではないので、 そのあたりを見定めたうえで措置すべきである」 2 Aough 44 R100 りの

回答募集中 回答数: 0
英語 高校生

至急!!私立大学看護学部の過去問です。答えがないため、回答を作って欲しいです!!科目は英語です。

問題番号に対応 効とする。 うち受験票お researchers at the University of Veterinary Medicine in Vienna, Austria, have found. Dogs won't give food to a human, even if that person gave them some food first, and that they would help other dogs that had helped them before. Therefore, the team Previous studies have shown that dogs can recognize cooperative and uncooperative humans, "reciprocal altruism"- that is, doing a good thing in return to a human who had given expected to find that their test subjects would put these two things together and show To start, the team trained a group of 37 dogs to press a button which would activate a them food first. *enclosure with the dispenser, while one of (2) two humans was in a separate enclosure with the button. One would press the button to food dispenser. Then, they put each dog in an would not. Each dog was paired with both humans in give food to the dog, and (4) unhelpful one. turn. After that, the researchers switched over the button and the dispenser. They expected that the dogs would press the button to give food to the helpful human but not to the though the dogs did press the button, they did it just as often when either human had the food dispenser, and even when no human was there at all. "In these kinds of studies (5) [perform / to / dogs / which/ trained / are in a particular behavior for an experiment, they will usually do the behavior a few times as they have simply learned the association between the behavior and getting a reward, and it may be enjoyable for them to do the behavior," said Jim McGetrick, a PhD student at the University of Veterinary Medicine in Vienna who led the research. 身を正しく が本冊子 1番 2 次の英文を読んで下の設問に答えなさい。 (3) giving us some food? Are they a combination of reasons. "It is (6) Why wouldn't our best pals want to help us out by secretly all bad boys and girls? McGetrick believes there is possible that the dogs did not understand enough about the task to realize that only one of the humans was providing them with food," he said. It could also be because they didn't fully understand the button and dispenser system, or because they were too focused on the food to notice whether a particular human was pressing the button or not. "Having said all that, even if they did completely understand the task and were fully attentive to the actions of the humans, there is still a good possibility that they wouldn't have given food back in return," he added. "It could be that providing food to a dog as they do not typically do that in everyday life." After all, humans are the ones who human is something very strange for (7) already have food, from a dog's perspective. why would your pet need to worry about (8) making sure you have enough? However, all the humans in the study were people the dogs didn't know. "It is quite 5

回答募集中 回答数: 0