学年

質問の種類

化学 高校生

2枚目の青線部についてですが、なぜ濃度が薄いと電離度が1になるんですか?回答よろしくお願いします!

322023年度 〔1〕 以下の文章を読み、 問1~ 問4 に答えよ。 なお, [X] は分子もしくはイオンX 大阪大-理系前期 8 のモル濃度を表す。 濃度 C [mol/L] の酢酸水溶液中でCH3COOH CH3COO + H+ の平衡が なりたっているとき,水のイオン積 Kw = [H+] [OH-] と酢酸の電離定数 [H+] [CH3COO-] Ka= [CH3COOH] 条件が を用いて,[H+] を表すことができる。 陽イオンと陰イオンの電荷のつりあいの 0.1=YOR [H+]= ア + イ を満たすこと,,および,濃度Cが C = ウ + I 00 20F 吉 4. 2. 2023年度 化学 33 H=RO 01-00 0 -10 -8 -6 -4 OH + 図1 log10( C (mol/L)) HU H -2 -2 0 (図) で表されることを考慮すれば, [H+] 以外の分子やイオンの濃度を消去すること により, [H+] に関する三次方程式 問1 空欄 ア よ。 2 エ にあてはまる分子やイオンのモル濃度を答え [H+] 3 + ( オ ) [H+]^+ ( ) [+] + ( キ )=0 問2 空欄 オ キ を Ka, Kw, ならびにCを用いて表せ。 が得られる。この方程式の解[H] を用い、酢酸の電離定数 K。 = 1.6 × 10-mol/L, 水のイオン積 Kw = 1.0 × 10-14 (mol/L) 2 として、酢 酸水溶液のpHの濃度変化曲線の一部を図1に描いた。 なお,濃度Cが高いときには、水の電離の影響を無視できるのでKw=0の近 問3 酢酸水溶液のpHは、濃度Cが低い領域でほぼ一定値をとる。その理由を 記せ。 さらに, C≦10mol/Lの範囲におけるpHの濃度変化を,解答用 [解答欄] 上の図と同じ。 紙の図1に実線で書き込め。 4804 似が許され, 三次方程式を二次方程式 [H+]? + Ka[H+] - KaC = 0 へと変形することができる。 この方程式の解 [H+] は, 高濃度の極限において KCで近似できる。 問4 酢酸水溶液のpHは,濃度Cが高い極限で10g10 (C[mol/L]) の一次関数と なる。 まず,C=1.0mol/Lの酢酸水溶液のpHを計算し, 小数点以下1桁 まで答えよ。 次に, C≧10-3 mol/Lの範囲でpHの濃度変化を, 解答用紙 図1に実線で書き込め。必要があれば10g10 2 0.3の近似値を用いよ。 [解答欄] 上の図1と同じ。

解決済み 回答数: 1
英語 高校生

ピンクで囲んだ部分のdestroyingとforcing、makingが何故ingが着いているのか分かりません😿分詞構文でしょうか?

You are preparing a presentation for the school science club, using this article from a scientific website. Reaching a Tipping Point: What to Do About the Problem of Space Junk? For over fifty years, slowly at first, but with increasing intensity, we've been sending objects up into orbit. Most of these items begin life as useful 使節を開始する有用な devices, such as the thousands of satellites that bring us information and give 装置として us our 21st century communication, but even these eventually fall out of use 結仕 使われなくなる or break. These satellites, living or dead, share an increasingly crowded layer, 混雑した層 known as near-earth orbit, with rocket parts, tools, and pieces of metal from objects that have already crashed together and broken into pieces. 粉々になる ?? This garbage poses a threat both (to working" satellites of which there are thousands), and (to the earth itself.) For example, in 2009 a disused Russian 使われなくなった module crashed into an active US satellite) destroying both and forcing the International Space Station to change course to avoid the thousands of broken ためらう pieces. While most junk that falls back to earth burns up in the atmosphere. 大気圏上空で larger chunks can occasionally hit the ground, posing a threat to people and Pieces that do burn up] leave pollutants in the atmosphere, such as Property aluminum particles, which can destroy the ozone layer アルミニウム 粒子 It's clear that removing space junk is vital if we are to maintain and build upon our current satellite network. The problem has been discussed continuously since the 1970s, when Donald Kessler, a senior scientist at NASA 継続的に described a scenario (later known as Kessler syndrome) (where a runaway 制御不能の others more and more likely. While the 2009 incident may be the first large cycle of collisions begins, with each collision creating more debris, making 衝突のサイクル near-earth collision, it is thought that Kessler syndrome has already begun with smaller objects. Since Kessler syndrome was first described, many solutions have been proposed, from using lasers to robotic garbage collectors, but cost has been an obstacle to most. In 2021, a Japan-based company named Astroscale launched ELSA-d (short for "End-of-Life Services by Astroscale Demonstration") to show

解決済み 回答数: 1
英語 高校生

英検準一級の要約問題です。 添削していただけないでしょうか?🙇‍♀️

英検公式サンプル問題 ⚫ Instructions: Read the article below and summarize it in your own words as far as possible in English. ⚫ Suggested length: 60-70 words Write your summary in the space provided on your answer sheet. Any writing outside the space will not be graded. From the 1980s to the early 2000s, many national museums in Britain were charging their visitors entrance fees. The newly elected government, however, was supportive of the arts. It introduced a landmark policy to provide financial aid to museums so that they would drop their entrance fees. As a result, entrance to many national museums, including the Natural History Museum, became free of charge. Supporters of the policy said that as it would widen access to national museums, it would have significant benefits. People, regardless of their education or income, would have the opportunity to experience the large collections of artworks in museums and learn about the country's cultural history. Although surveys indicated that visitors to national museums that became free increased by an average of 70 percent after the policy's introduction, critics claimed the policy was not completely successful. This increase, they say, mostly consisted of the same people visiting museums many times. Additionally, some independent museums with entrance fees said the policy negatively affected them. Their visitor numbers decreased because people were visiting national museums to avoid paying fees, causing the independent museums to struggle financially.

回答募集中 回答数: 0