学年

質問の種類

英語 高校生

長文どなたか教えてほしいです。 不安なんで…

ロ には 唱】 火のスピーチ放入を読んで、下紀の癌に和えなさい。 なおの人た家 本文の後に注があります。 As an old science reporter Tnd myselfin a diHfenlt position todai 0 Tighrtech executives on the topic of artifcial inteligence or AI Fnn surecoll 際。 far more about AI than 1 do. Stil. 1 think I can contribute some historical perspectHVe. Thave been writing science columns since many cf you were kids ( Z ) Hmrote my frst column on AT back in 1963。 Tm( イ ) because when T say *artifcial intelhgence"Tm talking about something that Tm not sure really exists. Those of you who have read my articlealand books on the subject know that Tbehieve in what we call imealk AT' and that 1 aminotieal onvineed by what we call srongALy oto Whats the difference? Lets say we program a computer to say Rhank youl in situations where real people would feel grateful. 1 think we could make eally sound like a thankful person。 Tm sure that such a machine and tuned so well that it could fool me were blindfolded But here's the question: Did the program actually feel thankf me? Or did the team who wrote the program thank me? Was According to the strong AL approach, the computer really couldibe ex According to weak AI, iCs just a machine making sounds。 Tim reminded of an old classic comedyy routine imagined a future world in which computers made 。 people really worried about that in the 1960s. In this ima handled every decision that humans didmt like making. One fmring other computers. So the comedy routine consists of a conm ose computer ecplaine to worker computer why itmust be fred The reason this comedy routine is interesting js not just bec because it expresses fears about strong AI。 ICs int 50 years ago- That's right。 a halfrcentury ago。 people uman decisions.They thoughtit might happ8mi the future.( ウ ).the predicted robotdominant、 Im my opinion, no matter how impressed none of us realiy believes that truly selfraware di exist. Tknow youre ll experts on AI but ileEs rogram, no matter how sophisticeted,( 王 ) marmyi jn or reject God. or say “Tlove you and mean it W cperatipg the machine-or who wrote the Dio As a real. thinking person who has obaerved tk research for many yearsu Tbelieve there will alaya bela efieve that no matter how sophisticated ATbeoon as a thinking person。T also know that 1 can be wi the future of science. Perhaps momeday those of yo

未解決 回答数: 1
英語 高校生

間違っていれば教えていただきたいです! 空欄補充など よくわかりませんでした。 問1で ⑴⑵ どちらでも良さそうなのですが、なぜ正解でない方はだめなんですか? まだ続きがあるのですが、写真が3枚までしか載せられないので、続きも見てくださる方は ‘続きも可 ’的にコメント... 続きを読む

hilosophers ave long_thonght<@bout the distinction [petweel humans animals> The_common yiew js lthat the ability<to thinlp js what て( umans and animals。 The French philosopher Ren6 Descarte who ia considered the father<6f modern phiosophw )arkued [that s animals can imitate, jmrman scdone]but they sannet came_ ae Giierwey( Da ls have Ge sbi repeat 説計るithe sftnet tey y hear, they do 人 I YO ror taow pytet 中 ey ae aingl IThe simple reaity<をhat amimam cannot 6 (omannteee。 (tith nyappears to support (he above_argument A lot of em researchC however。) suggests, Mthat 下 many animals have ttf lemotional landl oo語人Yer om reities。 ] Such research、 indicates that aome amimals have emoGonal_reacions、 <o their tving Eoy and some animals even 時 monatrate awerftul amotimaL hondsi other members<of > |their species>85 LM family memhery(Greorer) tt has also_become ro dlear khat some animals hav de 06jNy4Oeeoi Given (hese fimndings, it se oneh [reetne_anmas we important.| A number<of people h め heve long mved ha umans should show 人 交半om 4oward animal (Im recent decedes) some have ame animals actually have( ⑥ (し @ Xehat should be respeted> (For example) RmmeWHPPDETI了PT 員 sbased on KT

解決済み 回答数: 1