学年

質問の種類

英語 高校生

この文章の4行目にある、because they would harm whatever bacterial life forms might be present on the planet の文構造についてなのですが、might の前にあるはずの関係代名詞の主格whi... 続きを読む

次の文章を読んで、 問1~4に答えなさい。 The establishment of a colony on Mars has been a dream for decades. Inevitably some people have objected to the idea of colonizing Mars on both ideological and practical grounds. Some object to humans living on Mars because they would harm whatever bacterial life forms might be present on the planet. Others oppose Mars settlements because they disagree with the idea of using the Red Planet as a "backup" in case the Earth is destroyed. Those in favor of colonizing Mars, however, look to spread the human race beyond our single planet. The practical considerations of surviving long term on a world without a breathable atmosphere, no surface water, exposure to radiation, and extremes of heat and cold all have to be addressed first. Mars colonists could survive in domed cities, extracting and recycling resources from the Martian environment. However, a more interesting plan for the settlement of the Red Planet involves a process called terraforming, turning the dangerous environ- ment of Mars into something resembling Earth. Billions of years ago, Mars was more like Earth, with a thick atmosphere as well as oceans and rivers of surface water. The planet may well have had complex life forms. However, sometime in the distant past, Mars lost its (A ). When Mars found itself without the protection of that field, solar wind relentlessly stripped it of its atmosphere, quickly turning the planet into the frozen desert it currently is. While a number of schemes exist to restore Mars' atmosphere, creating a runaway greenhouse process that would raise its temperature, NASA and some academic researchers recently came up with a simple way to achieve the process naturally. The idea involves the creation of an electromagnetic shield between Mars and the Sun to protect the Red Planet from solar wind. Without the solar wind stripping it away, the atmosphere of Mars would gradually become thicker. Soon the temperature on the Martian surface would become high enough to release the trapped ( B ) at the poles, accelerating the (C). Water ice at the poles would melt, giving Mars back some measure of its oceans and rivers. All humans would have to do is introduce

解決済み 回答数: 1
英語 高校生

この問題の解き方がわからないです。誰か教えてくれると嬉しいです。

語句の付加などによる強調表現 do/does/did+動詞の原形 「たしかに/本 当に~する/した 」, the [this/that] very 十名詞 「まさにその~」, on earth, in the world 「いったい」 at all 「まったく」 同じ語の繰り返しによる強調, etc. [ ]内の指示に従って, 下線部を強調する文にしなさい。 1. This is the place I have wanted to visit. [very を用いて] 2. What are you going to do next? [in the world を用いて] 3. I tried to keep my promise, but I couldn't after all. [do の適切な形を用いて] 4. Where has she gone? [on earth を用いて] 5. He is not worried about his future. [in the least を用いて] 6. I'm not interested in such a thing. [at all を用いて] 7. He worked to support his family. [語を繰り返して] ガイド || It is that ... の強調構文は 「~」 の部分を強調する。 It is ~ that [who] ….. の強調構文を用いて, 下線部を強調する文を作りなさい。 D 1. I want to study Japanese history at college. 2. He bought a CD player at this store last Sunday. 3. John Lennon was shot at this spot in 1980. 4. I came to know her while I was in Kobe. 5. I was late because I missed the bus. 強調・倒置 73 ◆日本語をヒントにして ()内の語句を正しく並べかえ, 全文を書きなさい。 6. (it / was / who / you) told him the truth? [ 〜を彼に言ったのはあなたですか] 7. (it / that / was / where) you found the money? 8. It was (that / not / this morning / until) I heard the news. [ 〜を見つけたのはどこですか] [今朝になってはじめて~を聞いた]

解決済み 回答数: 1
英語 高校生

この文の第二段落のamid calls for ~のcallsは、名詞でしょうか?前置詞のamidとcalls forのつながりが、なぜこのような訳になるのか理解できません。このcalls が名詞だと仮定して直訳すると、管理下において大規模に火を放つことを求める要求の最中に... 続きを読む

王 jon 【目標解答時間 15分 配点 37点 15 次の英文を読み, 下記の設問 (A~D) に答えなさい。 Fire is "a good servant but a bad master." In my house, in summer, I smell the air for the faintest hint of smoke as keenly as any horse or dog or kangaroo. I watch for columns of smoke, visualising again and again how fire could rush( 1 )the hill towards us. But if you are philosophical about it, fire is a natural 5 part of the Australian environment and has been for millions of years. Living with the threat of fire in the bush, or in the wild, is like living with sharks when diving, or with snakes while walking, or with traffic accidents on a city street. The idea that we should remove every shark from the sea, or every snake from the land, and control- burn, or deliberately set fire, to prevent any risk of 10 bushfires is a recipe for making the environment even worse. As Phil Koperberg, head of the New South Wales Fire Brigades, said ( 2 ) the Sydney bushfires of 1994, amid calls for massive control burning, “Do you want to concrete over all the bush? If you choose to live in the bush, you choose to accept the risk. f It is often claimed that some Austratian plants and animals have actually adapted to fire, evidence of an extraordinarily long period (millions of years before human arrival) during which fire has been more significant in the Australian environment than it has been on any other continent, but this is probably not strictly true. Many plants have adapted to the environment in 20 ways that also happen to be valuable in times of fire. ( 3 ), animals have adapted to a variety of different habitats, and can therefore survive during different periods of vegetation regrowth after a fire (or after, say, a cyclone, a flood, or just a tree falling in a forest). A tree that has the ability to regenerate from roots or lower trunk when the 25 upper tree dies as a result of being broken off in a storm, or falls over, rotten to the core, will also be able to respond when the upper part is killed by a fire. Seeds adapted to long hot droughts, and requiring a combination of heat and water for germination", will also find a fire, if followed by rain, a good stimulus for growing new plants. There does appear to be evidence that chemicals in 30 smoke can help promote growth in plants, but whether this is a direct 可能性があるかを 何度も が続いているのだ。 森林地帯, ダイビングのときにサメ, そやカンガルーにも負けな の匂いを嗅ぐ。 私は,どのよ 暮らすようなものである。 海 しき主人である」( れば, 火事はオーストラリア >> のヘビを取り除くべきだと 意図的に火を放つべきだ , 1994年のシドニー ている真っ只中 と言った。 入れるこ

未解決 回答数: 0