学年

質問の種類

英語 高校生

基礎英文解釈の技術100 クジラの公式は理解できるのですが、この文章が理解できません。 特に語句を補っている部分が分かりません。

82 演習 82(問題→本冊:p.165) A man like Kasparov studies chess constantly and has memorized large numbers of openings, closings, and midgame situations, so that in some respects he plays mechanically. A computer can, in principle, do this with greater memory capability and thus, eventually, outmatch any human being. But this no more shows any real superiority than when it carries out vast numbers of mathematical operations simultaneously. 【全文訳】カスパロフのような人は常にチェスを研究して相当数の序盤, 終盤そして中 盤を記憶してしまっていて,その結果,場面によっては機械的にチェスをする。 理 論的にはコンピューターはそれよりも大きい記憶力で機械的にチェスをすることが できるし,それだから結局はどんな人間にも優る。しかし, だからといってコンピ ューターのほうが本当にすぐれていることにまったくならないのは, それが膨大な 数の数学の演算を同時に行う場合と同様である。 【解説】 第1文で前置詞句1like Kasparov は man を修飾している。large numbers of 「相当多くの」。 So that ~ 「その結果~」。 in some respects は, 内容から 「場面によ っては」とした。 第2文の do this は play mechanically のことである。blo arb tud stuo2 bas 第3文の〈no more than>をマークするのがポイント。次のように語句を補うと 意味がはっきりする。 h elS R this no more shows any real superiority ([when it plays chess|) 0 atitのか S Vt S Vt 「これが何ら真の優越性を示すものではないのは」 this は前文の内容を指す

解決済み 回答数: 1
英語 高校生

この長文がどんな話なのか理解できません😥 出来れば段落ごとに要約して頂けると助かります😔 よろしくお願いします!!!!!!!!!🙇🏽‍♀️🙇🏽‍♀️

We are,(to a remarkable degree, the right distance from the right sort of star, one e 5 of ten billion and we wouldn't be here now./ We are also fortunate to orbit where we that is big enough to radiate lots of energy, but not so big as to burn itself out swiftly t 1s a curiosity bf physics that the larger a stor the more rapidly it burns. Had our sun Ocen ten times as massive、it would have evhonsted itself after ten million years instead of do. 1o0 much nearer and evervthing on Farth would have boiled away. Much rarther away and everything would have frozen. の14 m 1978, an astrophysicist named Micheel Hart made some calculations and Concluded that Earth would have been uninhabitable had it been just 1 percent rartner That's not much, and in fact it wasn't enough. percent 10 from or 5.percent closer to the Sun. The figures have since been refined and made a little more generous 5 nearer and I5 percent farther are thought to be more accurate assessments 1oI om zone of habitability - but that is still a narrow belt. To appreciate just how narrow, you have only to look at Venus. Venus 1s only ©10 15 twenty-five million miles closer to the Sun than we are. The Sun's warmth reaches it just two minutes before it touches us. In size and composition, Venus is very like Earth, but the small difference in orbital distance made all the difference to (3)how it turned out. It appears that during the early years of the solar system Venus was only slightly warmer than Earth and probably had oceans. But those few degrees of extra 20 warmth meant that Venus could not hold on to its surface water, with disastrous consequences for its climate. As its water evaporated, the hydrogen atoms escaped into space, and the oxygen atoms combined with carbon to form a dense atmosphere of the greenhouse gas CO2. Venus became stifling. Although people of my age will recall a time when astrononmers hoped that Venus might harbor life beneath its padded 25 clouds, possibly even a kind of tropical vegetation, we now know that it is much too fierce an environment for any kind of life that we can reasonably conceive of. Its surface temperature is a roasting 470 degrees centigrade (roughly 900 degrees Fahrenheit), which is hot enough to melt lead, and the atmospheric pressure at the surface is ninety times that of Earth, or more than any human body could withstand We lack the technology to make suits or even spaceships that would allow us to visit Our knowledge of Venus's surface is based on distant radar imagery and som。 disturbing noise from an unmanned Soviet probe that was dropped hopefully into the

解決済み 回答数: 1