学年

質問の種類

英語 高校生

この話の内容がいまいち理解できません😔 どなたか詳しく教えて頂けると助かります!!!!!!!!!💧 宜しくお願いします!!!!!!!🙇🏽‍♀️🙇🏽‍♀️

0 The English language is full of words which have changed their meanings 3lightly or even dranmatically over the centuries. Changes of meaning can be of a number of I (of の用法)【nice の意味の変遷) different types. Some words, such as nice, have changed gradually. Emotive words tend 例示1企 今例示2 2(文構造) to change more rapidly by losing some of their force, so that awful, which originally とzthe meant ‘inspiring awe', now means Very bad’ or, in expressions such as awfully good, い 5 simply something like *very. In any case, all connection with ‘awe' has been lost. 2 Some changes of meaning, though, seem to attract more attention than others. (0This is perhaps particularly the case where the people who worry about such things 3 (the case where 】 【文構造】 believe that a distinction is being lost. For example, there is a lot of concern at the moment about the words uninterested and disinterested. In modern English, the positive 10 form interested has two different meanings. The first and older meaning is approximately 今説明 4 las の用法) 'having a personal involvement in', as in otniab neit The second and later, but now much more common, meaning is ‘demonstrating or He is an interested party in the dispute. pd cooig 不説明 1s experiencing curiosity in, enthusiasm for, concern for, as in 和 He is very interested in cricket. (2)It is not a problem that this word has more than one meaning. Confusion never 小理由 seems to occur, largely because the context will normally make it obvious which meaning is intended. In all human languages there are very many words which have more than one meaning- this is a very common and entirely normal (3)state of affairs. Most 20 English speakers, for example, can instantly think of a number of different meanings for the words common and state and affairs which I have just used.

解決済み 回答数: 1
英語 高校生

見辛かったらすみませんが、問2の英作文の添削をしていただきたいです🤲

2015年度 英語 13 They should not have to lose their livelihoods. Secondlv. although I agree 次の英文は、英語のディベートの授業での対話です。この対話を読み,下の問い に答えなさい。 with Keiko that climate change is a serious problem, I think air travel is a much less damaging source of carbon pollution than, for example, burnimg MR. ROBERTS: Good morning, everybody. Today we have the first of our Coal. We should address these more serious causes first. Finally, the most student debates. The topic this morning is air travel, and the argument is. 法 important reason is the issue of freedom. People in a democracy expect the “Domestic air travel in Japan should be discouraged." Keiko will first argue right to travel as they wish. It has made our lives more convenient and in favor of the proposal and Junko will speak against. Over to you, Keiko. created more opportunities for everyone. We should not reduce our quality of life. Thank you for listening. KEIKO: Good morning, everybody. I am going to speak today in favor of the proposal. Limitless air travel inside Japan is a luxury that we can no longer MR. ROBERTS: Thank you to our two speakers. Now, are there any afford. The main reason is that it is extremely damaging to the questions from the audience? environment. The carbon gases produced by aircraft are very high and are a 頭人 proven cause of global warming. Therefore, we should try and reduce air 問1 次の(1)~(5)の文について, 本文の内容と一致するものには○.一致しないも travel as much as possible to protect the environment, not only for Japan but のには×を,それぞれ解答欄に記入しなさい。 also for the whole world. Secondly, air travel is actually unnecessary within the four islands of Japan. Now, while I appreciate that travel to Okinawa is (1) Keiko's main reason for opposing domestic air travel is the damage it a different case, there are efficient train services throughout Japan that are causes to the environment. h fast and environmentally friendly. These make an excellent alternative to air (2) Keiko thinks that air travel is cheap and efficient. flights, so there is really no need to use airplanes in most cases. Finally, (3) Keiko recommends that people travel between Okinawa and mainland there is an economic reason. Air travel is expensive for passengers because Japan by ship. the price of fuel keeps increasing, but airline companies are still struggling (4) Junko thinks that climate change is not an important problem. to make profits. Moreover, regional airports often cannot attract enough (5) Junko thinks that a lot of jobs will be lost if air travel is reduced. customers, and, overall, the industry is not cost-effective, It's time to admit that air travel is too damaging and expensive to be sustainable. Thank you. 問2 次の質問に英語で答えなさい。 Which of the two speakers do you more agree with? Give at least one JUNKO: Thank you, Keiko. I am going to disagree with the proposal for three reason for your answer. (解答欄:13.8cm×4行) reasons. Firstly, I think there is a strong economic case to support flying. Many jobs depend on air travel, not just the pilots and cabin staff, but also people who work in airports or for airlines, or who rely on fast transport.

回答募集中 回答数: 0
英語 高校生

見辛かったらすみませんが、問2の英作文の添削をしていただきたいです🤲

2015年度 英語 13 They should not have to lose their livelihoods. Secondlv. although I agree 次の英文は、英語のディベートの授業での対話です。この対話を読み,下の問い に答えなさい。 with Keiko that climate change is a serious problem, I think air travel is a much less damaging source of carbon pollution than, for example, burnimg MR. ROBERTS: Good morning, everybody. Today we have the first of our Coal. We should address these more serious causes first. Finally, the most student debates. The topic this morning is air travel, and the argument is. 法 important reason is the issue of freedom. People in a democracy expect the “Domestic air travel in Japan should be discouraged." Keiko will first argue right to travel as they wish. It has made our lives more convenient and in favor of the proposal and Junko will speak against. Over to you, Keiko. created more opportunities for everyone. We should not reduce our quality of life. Thank you for listening. KEIKO: Good morning, everybody. I am going to speak today in favor of the proposal. Limitless air travel inside Japan is a luxury that we can no longer MR. ROBERTS: Thank you to our two speakers. Now, are there any afford. The main reason is that it is extremely damaging to the questions from the audience? environment. The carbon gases produced by aircraft are very high and are a 頭人 proven cause of global warming. Therefore, we should try and reduce air 問1 次の(1)~(5)の文について, 本文の内容と一致するものには○.一致しないも travel as much as possible to protect the environment, not only for Japan but のには×を,それぞれ解答欄に記入しなさい。 also for the whole world. Secondly, air travel is actually unnecessary within the four islands of Japan. Now, while I appreciate that travel to Okinawa is (1) Keiko's main reason for opposing domestic air travel is the damage it a different case, there are efficient train services throughout Japan that are causes to the environment. h fast and environmentally friendly. These make an excellent alternative to air (2) Keiko thinks that air travel is cheap and efficient. flights, so there is really no need to use airplanes in most cases. Finally, (3) Keiko recommends that people travel between Okinawa and mainland there is an economic reason. Air travel is expensive for passengers because Japan by ship. the price of fuel keeps increasing, but airline companies are still struggling (4) Junko thinks that climate change is not an important problem. to make profits. Moreover, regional airports often cannot attract enough (5) Junko thinks that a lot of jobs will be lost if air travel is reduced. customers, and, overall, the industry is not cost-effective, It's time to admit that air travel is too damaging and expensive to be sustainable. Thank you. 問2 次の質問に英語で答えなさい。 Which of the two speakers do you more agree with? Give at least one JUNKO: Thank you, Keiko. I am going to disagree with the proposal for three reason for your answer. (解答欄:13.8cm×4行) reasons. Firstly, I think there is a strong economic case to support flying. Many jobs depend on air travel, not just the pilots and cabin staff, but also people who work in airports or for airlines, or who rely on fast transport.

回答募集中 回答数: 0
英語 高校生

NEO 現代を読む standard ユニット7について、和訳をお願いします。

The Ancient Egyptians used a writing system called hieroglyphs*. It is a very good system Unit 7 |423 words / 中央大 - Language - of writing and was used in Egypt for almost four thousand years. (1)This means th hieroglyphs were being read and written for longer than the Roman alphabet has been. The. only stopped being used when Egypt became a Christian country and its people stopped 5 worshipping the Egyptian gods. |2 Centuries later, people were puzzled about how to read hieroglyphs. They thought that the hieroglyphs must be pictures of ideas and things and not an alphabet. There were about 750 hieroglyphic* symbols in use during most of the period of the ancient Egyptian civilization. This is far fewer than the 85,568 Chinese characters contained in the 1994 Zhonghua Zihai 10 Chinese dictionary. So, 750 hieroglyphs would seem to be too few to be pictures of all the things that humans need to describe%; but, at the same time, far too many to be an alphabet - only requires 26 letters to make all its words. 3 The answer is that hieroglyphs are ( 2a ) an alphabet ( 2b )a system of pictures. It is as if Japanese hiragana and kanji were combined in one system. The basic Egyptian alphabet consists 15 of twenty-four letters. Vowels* were not written. If this is done in English, it looks like this: (3)Ths hs n vwls'. This may seem difficult to read in a foreign language, but for native speakers, it is fairly easy (most people who send text messages between mobile phones take out vowels to make the words shorter). |4 In many ways, the Egyptian hieroglyphs are surprisingly similar to Japanese. Both systems 20 can be written in either vertical or horizontal lines and they can also be written either from right to left or left to right. With hieroglyphs, (ait is easy to tell whether they should be read from the right or left because many of them can be turned to face the direction they should be read from. Hieroglyphs, like Japanese kanji, were a form of art. Also like kanji, there are no ( 5a ) between the words-whidh are so helpful for understanding English. (sbIfwemissoutthespacesinEnglish, 25 itisratherdifficulttoread! Some words were written using the alphabet, some with just one hieroglyph.(6)'Sun', for example, was written with two circles, one inside the other. As with Japanese, it also means 'day'. 5 Hieroglyphs look to most people like an impossibly difficult system derstand. In truth, they are one of the most practical and beautiful writing systems ever created, combining 30 the advantages of kanji with the advantages of an alphabet system. hieroglyph:ヒエログリフ(古代工ジブトの聖刻文字) hieroglyphic : ヒエログリフの vowel:母音 18

回答募集中 回答数: 0
英語 高校生

NEO 現代を読む standard ユニット7について、和訳をお願いします。

1 The Ancient Egyptians used a writing system called hieroglyphs*. It is a very good system of writing and was used in Egypt for almost four thousand years. (1)This means that Unit 7 | 423 words / 中央大 - Language - hieroglyphs were being read and written for longer than the Roman alphabet has been. Th. only stopped being used when Egypt became a Christian country and its people stopper 5 worshipping the Egyptian gods. |2 Centuries later, people were puzzled about how to read hieroglyphs. They thought that the hieroglyphs must be pictures of ideas and things and not an alphabet. There were about 750 gyptian civilization. hieroglyphic* symbols in use during most of the period of the ancient This is far fewer than the 85,568 Chinese characters contained in the 1994 Zhonghua Zihai 10 Chinese dictionary. So, 750 hieroglyphs would seem to be too few to be pictures of all the things that humans need to describe; but, at the same time, far too many to be an alphabet - English only requires 26 letters to make all its words. 3 The answer is that hieroglyphs are ( 2a ) an alphabet ( 2b ) a system of pictures. It is as if Japanese hiragana and kanji were combined in one system. The basic Egyptian alphabet consists 15 of twenty-four letters. Vowels* were not written. If this is done in English, it looks like this: (3)Ths hs n vwls'. This may seem difficult to read in a foreign language, but for native speakers, it is fairly easy (most people who send text messages between mobile phones take out vowels to make the words shorter). In many ways, the Egyptian hieroglyphs are surprisingly similar to Japanese. Both systems 20 can be written in either vertical or horizontal lines and they can also be written either from right 4 to left or left to right. With hieroglyphs, (4)it is easy to tell whether they should be read from the right or left because many of them can be turned to face the direction they should be read from. Hieroglyphs, like Japanese kanji, were a form of art. Also like kanji, there are no ( 5a ) between the words - which are so helpful for understanding English. (5b)IfwemissoutthespacesinEnglish, 25 itisratherdifficulttoread! Some words were written using the alphabet, some with just one hieroglyph. (6YSun', for example, was written with two circles, one inside the other. Aswith Japanese, it also means 'day'. [5 Hieroglyphs look to most people like an impossibly difficult system tounderstand. In truth, they are one of the most practical and beautiful writing systems ever created, combining 30 the advantages of kanji with the advantages of an alphabet system. hieroglyph:ヒエログリフ(古代エジブトの聖刻文字) hieroglyphic: ヒエログリフの vowel:母音 18

回答募集中 回答数: 0