学年

質問の種類

英語 中学生

本日、投稿し直します! 今日こそ、これを教えてくれる人、来て~!(ガチでへるぷみー)

【7】 次の英文の空所に入る適切な単語 (前置詞) を書きなさい。 Most of us are interested ( ) science. He is very good ( at ) speaking English. Suma is famous ( ) its beautiful beach. Wine is made ( The top of the mountain is covered He is looking forward ( We were much surprised ( I got a letter written ( Please take ( (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) 次は、 前置詞の穴埋め問題 ・・・ 覚えた連語や文法が役立ちます (6) (7) (8) (9) ) grapes. (10) The basket is full ( (11) They don't work ( (12) These shoes are too big ( (13) I can swim fastest ( (14) Tom read books about Japanese (15) I usually drink coffee ( (16) This desk is made ( (17) Ken is very fond ( (18) Yuki takes care ( (19) My mother was born ( (20) Don't be late ( (21) How ( (22) Arisa took part ( (23) It is difficult ( (24) Why were you absent ( ( (25) I have lived in Nagoya (26) His name was known ( (27) Thank you very much ( (28) Have you ever been ( (29) February is ( (30) Tuesday comes ( (31) ( ) seeing ) English. ) your shoes when you enter a house in Japan. ) beautiful flowers. ) Sundays. ) ) snow. you. ) the news. ) me. ) all the boys. history ( ) sugar. ) wood. ) listening to rock music. ) this cat. ) school. ) taking a walk around here ? ) morning till night. ) January 28th, 1975. ) the festival last year. me to get up early. ) school yesterday? ) a long time. I must finish this English homework ( ) everyone. ) inviting me to the party. ) Singapore ? ) January and March. ) Monday. ) next Monday.

未解決 回答数: 1
英語 高校生

至急!!私立大学看護学部の過去問です。答えがないため、回答を作って欲しいです!!科目は英語です。

問題番号に対応 効とする。 うち受験票お researchers at the University of Veterinary Medicine in Vienna, Austria, have found. Dogs won't give food to a human, even if that person gave them some food first, and that they would help other dogs that had helped them before. Therefore, the team Previous studies have shown that dogs can recognize cooperative and uncooperative humans, "reciprocal altruism"- that is, doing a good thing in return to a human who had given expected to find that their test subjects would put these two things together and show To start, the team trained a group of 37 dogs to press a button which would activate a them food first. *enclosure with the dispenser, while one of (2) two humans was in a separate enclosure with the button. One would press the button to food dispenser. Then, they put each dog in an would not. Each dog was paired with both humans in give food to the dog, and (4) unhelpful one. turn. After that, the researchers switched over the button and the dispenser. They expected that the dogs would press the button to give food to the helpful human but not to the though the dogs did press the button, they did it just as often when either human had the food dispenser, and even when no human was there at all. "In these kinds of studies (5) [perform / to / dogs / which/ trained / are in a particular behavior for an experiment, they will usually do the behavior a few times as they have simply learned the association between the behavior and getting a reward, and it may be enjoyable for them to do the behavior," said Jim McGetrick, a PhD student at the University of Veterinary Medicine in Vienna who led the research. 身を正しく が本冊子 1番 2 次の英文を読んで下の設問に答えなさい。 (3) giving us some food? Are they a combination of reasons. "It is (6) Why wouldn't our best pals want to help us out by secretly all bad boys and girls? McGetrick believes there is possible that the dogs did not understand enough about the task to realize that only one of the humans was providing them with food," he said. It could also be because they didn't fully understand the button and dispenser system, or because they were too focused on the food to notice whether a particular human was pressing the button or not. "Having said all that, even if they did completely understand the task and were fully attentive to the actions of the humans, there is still a good possibility that they wouldn't have given food back in return," he added. "It could be that providing food to a dog as they do not typically do that in everyday life." After all, humans are the ones who human is something very strange for (7) already have food, from a dog's perspective. why would your pet need to worry about (8) making sure you have enough? However, all the humans in the study were people the dogs didn't know. "It is quite 5

回答募集中 回答数: 0
英語 高校生

37と38の赤線を引いた部分 関係代名詞が修飾する語句について 今までは直前の名詞を修飾すると思っていましたが 37番では直前の名詞spainではなく the noble animal を修飾しています 関係代名詞が修飾する語句の見分け方はどういうところからですか?

This is the book [(of which) the teacher is proud]. (1) the teacher (S) を修飾する場合: →先行詞 the book を which に代入して the teacher の直後に付ける。 the teacher (of the book) 意味が不明。 (2) is (V) を修飾する場合: is (of the book)意味が不明。 (3) proud (C) を修飾する場合: proud (of the book) (○) (3) では「その本を誇りにして」と意味がとおるので (of which) が修飾するのは (3) の proud (C)。訳は「これは本である[(その本のことを) 先生は誇りにしている]」 →「これは先生が誇りにしている本である」 となります。 第1文 (~している)間にに取り組んでいる 原子 爆弾 でロス アラモス の間 大戦 [While working on the atom bomb (at Los Alamos) (during ... War), (接) (現分) (Vt) O M “While working" は “While (he was) working” とも, 分詞構文 working に接 while を付加して “While he worked" の意味を明確にしたとも解釈できます (31課)。 ファインマンは•••に~をさせた Feynman S M 妻 ・・・に~を出す 自分(に) 手紙(を) him letters send his wife had Vt (使役) C → (Vt) (0₁) (O2) (それ) 自分が ない を知ら 鍵 [(to which) he did not know the key]: M S Vt (否) O を使って 暗号 彼はと感じた満足している(~する)ときに彼がわかった he felt satisfied S Vi C (過分) [when (接) in a code) M (to which) を (to a code) にして, the key (to a code) の結合を見抜くのがポイン トです。 <have Oⓘ> (→16課) に注意。 暗号 he discovered the code]. S Vt O 〈全文訳〉 第2次世界大戦中ロス・アラモスで原爆に取り組んでいる間、ファインマ ンは自分が解読の鍵を知らない暗号で妻に自分宛の手紙を出させた。そして、彼 は暗号を解読して満足した。 【【語句】 Feynman ファインマン (1918-88; 米国の物理学者; ノーベル物理学賞)/ work on に取り組む / Los Alamos (ロス・アラモス; 米国 New Mexico 北部の町; 最初に原爆を製造した研究所の所在地) / code 图暗号/key 图(問題・パズルの) 手 がかい / [] を発見する 時間関係の難 77 関係詞節の把握

未解決 回答数: 1
英語 高校生

関係代名詞がCになる場合があるというのは これは関係代名詞節が直前のCを修飾していると言うことで良いですか?

Cである関代は見えないことがしばしば 目的格の関代と同様, C の役割をする関代が 「透明接着剤」に変身し, I'm not the person I was before. のように,〈名詞 [Sbe/become]> の形で英文に入り込む場 合があります。〈名詞 [ (透明接着剤) Sbe/become]> とイメージしましょう。 第1と第2文 動物 ではスペイン [(そう)それがであるではイギリス is (in England)]. Vi M 犬はではない 身分の高い The dog is not the noble animal (in Spain) [that it S Vi (否) (形) C (先) M (関代) CS that-節がこの課のポイントです。 “The dog is C in Spain" と “it is (C) in England" を対比して、 「it=the dog で本来は “it is” の後にCが必要だが、後ろにな いので that が C の役割をする 関代」 と判断します。 には C, すなわち “The dog is in England.” という文を設定すると, that の先行詞が入ります。 先行詞は直前の名詞とは限りませんよ。 the noble animal なら OK ですね。 that-節の直訳は「それがイギリスではそのようなものである (下線 部は that の直訳)」 となります。 この訳を the noble animal につなぐと「犬はスペイ ンでは身分の高い動物ではない, イギリスでは身分が高い動物だが」となります。 いじめられ それが (られ) る gets... tormented ...]. V (受) (過分) 理由はについてのこのことであるということ で 街 The reason (for this) is [ that (in... streets) it S M ViC → (接) M S this は前文を指します。 is の後に 〈that (M) SVX〉は28課で既習ですよ。 〈get +過去分詞>の箇所は受動態なので「いじめられる」の意味です。 that-節の 中は so が見えて後に that SV ... となっていますから, <s0 ~ that ... > の構文 ( 30 課) です。 第3文は内容から判断すると [that it becomes cowardly, (and) then (it) forfeits respect] となるべきところです。 〈全文訳〉犬はスペインではイギリスとは違って身分の高い動物ではない。この理由 は、スペインの村や労働者階級の街では犬は小さな男の子たちからひどくいじめ られて臆病になってしまいそれで尊重されなくなる、ということなのだ。 【語句】noble 囲 身分の高い/working-class 形労働者階級の / torment V をいじめ る / cowardly 臆病な / forfeit [V] を失う / respect 尊重 関係詞節の把握

未解決 回答数: 1