学年

質問の種類

生物 高校生

24,25 答えが4,5なのですが、解説に書いてある②の説明って違くないですか? マルカメムシの方が孵化率高くないですか?

えよ。 (配点 17 ) クズやエンドウ, ダ 分布する近縁種のタ ほとんど利用しない。 て飼育することが可 ■内には共生細菌 A に生息している。 は見つけることが -れている。 2種の たカプセルを卵と 口吻を使ってカプ マルカメムシを用 れぞれに,その エンドウとダイ の孵化率を図1 監率を図1(b) に ■シを飼育 問1 第4回 生 物 「下線部(a)に関して, 細菌ドメインに関する記述として誤っているものを. 次の①~④のうちから一つ選べ。 23 ① 分子系統樹で古細菌よりも真核生物に近いドメインである。 ② 光合成を行うものがいる。 ③大腸菌が含まれる。 ④ 五界説では原核生物界に属する。 問2 実験の結果から導かれる考察として適当なものを、次の①~⑤のうち から二つ選べ。 ただし, 解答の順序は問わない。 24 25 ① マルカメムシの卵の孵化率は,幼虫に与えたカプセルの種類によって4 倍の差がある。 (mm) 30 31 32 33 ② 幼虫に与えたカプセルの種類によらず,タイワンマルカメムシよりもマ ルカメムシの方が,卵の孵化率が高くなる。 BASES ③タイワンマルカメムシは,本来利用していないエンドウとダイズを餌と して与えられたため, 幼虫に与えたカプセルの種類によらず卵の孵化率が 低い。 ④ カメムシの種類よりも、腸内に共生する共生細菌の種類の方が卵の孵化 率に大きく影響する。 タイワンマルカメムシは, 自然下で利用していないエンドウとダイズを 餌として与えられても, 共生細菌が別の種に替わると卵の孵化率が高くな る。 ワン メムシ プセル -29-

解決済み 回答数: 1
英語 中学生

(お)で、問いがjohnになったつもりで4語以上の英語をかきなさい、模範解答が can you take me なんですが 自分はwhy dont we go っと書きまして この場合減点ですか ばつですか? 

図2 青木さんの家にホームステイしている bag) を使って料理を作るバッククッキング (Pack Cooking) の講習会 ながら会話をしています。 次の英文は、講習会のちらしと会話の一部です。 ①~③に答えなさい。 会のちらし Be a Pack Cooking Are you interested in an easy way of cooking? If so, how about trying "Pack Cooking"? It's very easy! Cut ingredients, put them into a plastic bag, put the bags in Day : Every Saturday Time : 1:00 p.m. 4:00 p.m. (Time to start eating: 2:30 p.m.) Place Fee : Room 105, Kozue Hall : 500 yen for one person To join us, you must come with an adult if you are an elementary school student. For more information, call at 123-4567. John (300 yen for food, 200 yen for the room) Students do not have to pay for the room. : Today's dinner tastes so good! How did Ms. Aoki Oh, thank you. Look at this. It is John (63) you make this? call "Pack Cooking." We need only water. ingredients, seasoning, and plastic bags. We don't need many cooking tools. That sounds interesting! I have never heard that. Ms. Aoki When we cook in this way, we can make several dishes in one pot at the same John time by putting the bags in the hot water and boiling them together. That means we can (う) water, right? Ms. Aoki : John That's right. We also need only a little seasoning before we seal the bags. (え) Why? Is that enough? I'm afraid that the taste will be Ms. Aoki: No! The food tastes good. The flavor of the seasoning soon spreads through the food because the bags in the hot water are sealed. After enjoying the dish, we have to wash only the pot and a few other things. Easy, right? John Ms. Aoki John : That's cool. I'm interested in Pack Cooking. (お) to this seminar? Sure. Then, let's go there next Saturday. You will pay only for food because yo are a junior high school student. : That's perfect! Thank you, Ms. Aoki. (E) ingredient adult stel seasoning - boil ~をゆでる fee tool. A pay for 〜 〜の支払いをする pot なべ seal 〜を密封する flavor 講習会のちらしとして (あ) に入れるのに最も適当なのは、ア~エのうちではどれです 一つ答えなさい。 ( ( 7 Cartoonist 1 Newscaster ウ Chef I Lawyer

解決済み 回答数: 1
英語 高校生

問4の⑤の計算はどうすれば合うのですか。 教えてください🙇‍♀️ 3枚目が答えです。

次の英文を読んで,下の設問に答えなさい。 Last year, 4.2 million babies died. That is the most recent number reported by UNICEF of deaths before the age of one, worldwide. We often see lonely and emotionally charged numbers like this in the news or in the materials of activist groups or organizations. They produce a reaction. Who can even imagine 4.2 million dead babies? It is so terrible, and even worse when we know that almost all died from easily preventable diseases. And how can anyone argue that 4.2 million is anything other than a huge number? You might think that nobody would even try to argue (that, but you would be wrong. That is exactly why I mentioned this number. Because it is not huge: it is beautifully small. If we even start to think about how tragic each of these deaths is for the parents who had waited for their newborn to smile, and walk, and play, and instead had to bury their baby, then this number could keep us crying for a long time. But who would be helped by these tears? Instead let's think clearly about human suffering. The number 4.2 million is for 2016. The year before, the number was 4.4 million. The year before that, it was 4.5 million. Back in 1950, it was 14.4 million. That's almost 10 million more dead babies per year, compared with today. Suddenly this terrible number starts to look smaller. In fact (2)the number has never been lower. Of course, I am the first person to wish the number was even lower and falling even faster. But to know how to act, and how to prioritize resources, nothing can be more important than doing the cool-headed math and realizing what works and what doesn't. And this is clear: more and more deaths are being prevented. comparing the numbers. (3). We would never realize that without

解決済み 回答数: 1