学年

質問の種類

英語 高校生

問4① 彼らは少ない時間でより生産的になる、というのが仕事に対して言っていると特定できるのは何故でしょうか、、、?? 本文で生産的になるのが仕事のことしか言っていないからでしょうか??

第3回 実戦問題 73 Vou are going to have a debate about men taking parental leave. In order to prepare for the debate, your group is reading the article below. According t0 a recent survey, about 5.14% of new fathers in Japan Love taken parental leave. Over the years, the number of men who take 18u0 narental leave has grown, but it is still a big challenge for men to take it in male-oriented-Japanese society. So, here is my question: Do you think more Japanese men should take parental leave or not? Taking parental leave has one great benefit. If men take it for even a couple of weeks after the baby arrives, it is a great help to their wives. Most families are now nuclear families, so it is more difficult for couples with a new child to get support from their parents. Husbands can provide not only physical support but also mental support to their wives. Since new mothers face many unexpected situations every day, they can feel a lot of stress. Getting help is the key to reducing it. Another benefit is that parental leave is usually refreshing for men, allowing them to work more efficiently after they return to their jobs. On the other hand, there are reasons men should not take it. (First, during parental leave, they get no salary. This can put a lot of pressure on family finances. Second, many people are still against men taking it, which places psychological pressure on the men who do. What do you think about this issue? Ibelieve that when men take parental leave, it helps them understand how hard caring for a baby is. Knowing more about the hard work of their wives surely strengthens their relationship. Furthermore, when men eagerly raise their children, Tamily bonds become stronger. Nobody could argue that such things should be not be encouraged. 第3回 don

回答募集中 回答数: 0
英語 高校生

SDGSの英語長文問題です。 答えが配られなくて困っています、、 どなたか問題を解いていただきたいです

Before World War II, Japanese Consul-General Chiune Sugihara was sent to Kaunas to open a consulate service. Kaunas was the temporary capital of Lithuania at the time Reading Refugees in Recent Years J次の英文は第2次世界大戦当時、ナチスに迫害されていた多くのユタヤ人を救った杉原干動。 ついて書かれたものです。英文を読んで、問いに答えなさい。 For Chiune Sugihara u入 boobi 30 signi follim . Ba wrot be o chos. and was strategically situated between Germany and the Soviet Union. After Hitler.。 invasion of Poland on September 1, 1939, a wave of Jewish refugees living in Poland streamed into Lithuania. They escaped from Poland without possessions or money. By 1940, most of Western Europe had been conquered by the Nazis. Most free countries barred the immigration of Jewish refugees from Poland or anywhere in Nazi- occupied Europe. Germany and Soviets were approaching Lithuania rapidly. In July 1940, the Soviet authorities instructed all foreign embassies day to g 35 Lith the Ko all left immediately, but Sugihara managed to obtain permission to extend his Kaunas. Almost a 40 the STTOS stay. in 0quion as taqe On a summer morning in late July 1940, Consul Sugihara and his family awakened to a crowd of Polish-Jewish refugees gathered outside the consulate. Desperate to flee the q ynem CH approaching Nazis and Soviets, the refugees knew that their only path lay to the east. If Consul Sugihara them Japanese transit visas, they could race to possible re freedom. Sugihara was moved by their plight, but he did not have the authority to issue hundreds of visas without permission from the Foreign Ministry in Tokyo. Sugihara wired his government three times for permission to issue visas to the Jewish refugees. Three times he was denied. 45 u d 1 MOLIG- KOinE After repeatedly receiving negative responses from Tokyo, the Consul had a dificult decision to make. He was a man who was brought up in the strict and traditional : discipline of the Japanese. He was a career diplomat, who suddenly had to make a very difficult choice. On the one hand, he was bound by the traditional obedience he c all his life. On the other hand, he thought that he had to help those who were in need. He knew that if he defied the orders of his superiors, he might be fired and disgraced, and would probably never work for the Japanese government again. This # would result in extreme financial hardship for his family in the future. Sugihara even feared for the lives of himself, his wife and children, but in the end he just followed his conscience. The visas would be signed. 72

回答募集中 回答数: 0
数学 高校生

英語の長文ってどうやったら読めるようになりますか

1 次の英文を読んで、問 (1) ~ (5) に且本語で答えなさい。 Lobola is the African custom of paying fora bride. Although it is an old custom, not In fact, it is being debated in Botswana. everyone in African cultures is happy with it. Many people, including many women, support payment of lobola. They explain that in Tswana culture, a marriage means joining a family, not just marrying an individual. The idea of marrying into a family is very African. just the man.Through marriage, the young woman's family loses their daughter as she then becomes a part of her husband's family. Lobola is a way to show thanks. It is a form of generosity in African culture. In its traditional form, they also explain, the groom's family gave cattle to the bride's family. But it didn't matter whether the family owned cattle or not. A woman does not get married to A man only had to pay what he could afford if he had no cattle, he could give something else, even the smallest form of payment. The tradition of lobola was a matter of pride. Today, lobola is often given in cash. purchase of a bride. Lobola is meant to join two families together. They know that But its supporters say it is not about the some people abuse the custom. But they believe that the tradition should not be tossed out because it has many positive effects. Rather than get rid of it, many believe it should just be explained better. However, many others say this custom should be stopped. They think it has become commercialized. Families make lots of demands on the groom. They think this makes lobola look very bad. They argue that in Africa's past, a girl was an asset at home. and other household chores. She did the cooking When a family lost that child through marriage, it demanded payment. Today, they think that lobola has changed into a useless tradition. In this custom, a man is buying the right to control a woman. They say women are individuals with rights. In today's world, parents do not have to be paid for a bride because their male and female children are equal. They all work and make contributions to the household. They believe that paying lobola makes it seem like a man is buying a pair of shoes or a bicycle, instead of getting married. They also argue that it is often a financial burden for couples. It is too difficult for many people to pay the price asked. So, is lobola a rich tradition, bringing families together? Or is it an ugly custom of buying women? This debate continues in Botswana, as does the custom.

回答募集中 回答数: 0