These are increasingly important as part of the social infrastructure essential in such a logistics revolution. この英文の構造はどうなりますか？

1番上の（）には、cultures もしくはculture どちらが入りますか？

B Complete the following table using the words in the box. Change the form of the words if necessary. Paragraph 12 13 4 5 6 7 8 Summary けれども Though romantic love is universal, its expression varies according to (1. Cultures). Fale 83 Some psychiatrists argue that our romantic love is rooted in (2. child hood ) experiences. 9 主張する ~と関係がある Some psychologists argue that our choice of partners has to do with our instinct to have (3. healthy children. Professor Marazzitti argues that the (4. Chemical) condition in our brain and body influences romantic love. Helen Fisher argues that (5.dopamine ) promotes passion and (6.0xytocin) promotes mutual feelings of connection and bonding. We have seen several theories trying to explain love. However, is it possible to explain love completely with (7. Scientific) theories? 化学の 子ども時代 文化 科学の 危険そうな オキシトシン WHEEN ENESTE TION chemical childhood culture dopamine healthy oxytocin scientific

英作文の問題で「将来なりたい職業は何ですかまた、それはなぜですか？」という問題の私の回答です。スペルミスや文法の使い方の間違いなどを見てほしいです。 l want to be an psychologist in the future.she helped me when... 続きを読む

英語長文ポラリス1-8 「人が誰であるか」という訳になる理由を教えてください。

7 (For the social psychologist), it is the language [one identifies with SV C and through which one is identified]. 社会心理学者にとっては、母語とは、共感できる言語であり、 また、その言語 を通して人が誰であるか認識できる言語である。 語句 social psychologist 「社会心理学者｣ identify with ~｢~と同一とみなす」 和訳

最初の1文の文構造を教えてください！(svocとか)

57 タイエン doballsubra b. In a quiet room. Q. Where do we eat less? a. In a noisy room. チャ No more TV dinners, no more snacking with Paul McCartney on the kitchen stereo and certainly no listening to the more intellectual bits of Radio 4 over breakfast. If you want to lose weight, the best 1 2 3 accompaniment to a meal is the sound of your own chewing, a study 5 suggests. Psychologists in the US have found that people consume less food when they can hear themselves eating. They believe the effect to be so powerful that even simply telling somebody that they are eating a crunchy snack makes them eat less. In a considerable nonstopen benefit sps without

問題の解答解説がないため、 教えて頂きたいです🙏 よろしくお願いします🙇🏻‍♀️

(1) 彼らはフランス料理だけでなく日本料理もいくつか出来ます。 They [ but also / cook / some / French dishes / not only ] Japanese ones. (②2) 彼女は、コーヒーはブラックでいいですかと私にたずねた。 She [liked/my/ asked / black / if /me / I / coffee ]. (3) 調査によって、 心理学者は非常に嫉妬心が強い人に共通する性格の特徴を3つ見いだした。 In surveys, in common / three personality characteristics / have discovered / that / psychologists/ have / very jealous people / the fact ]. (4) 文学が役に立たないという考えに私は反対だ。 I disagree with [ that / literature / idea / the / is ] useless. (5) Tom no sooner had [ police / seen / the / than ] he ran away.

数学II　対数 この解き方で解けない理由を教えて下さい。

506 (2) log₂ (√9+4√3 √√9+4√√2 № 9-4√2 logis 3 Ţ = log₂ (№ 9 + 4√2 2 √ 1+4√√2 + 5 √√ (1+√7) ² 1-√√8 9-45√² ) Dag, ((1+52) + 11-201) log 9-452) 1 = 4√√2 + 8 +

この仮定法の文 if節は仮定法過去っぽいですが、 主節は仮定法過去っぽくてよく分かりません。 過去の話では無いのでhaveが出てくるのが不思議です

PARAGRAPH 6 10トピック 神経組織の働きからは｢経験」そのものを説明することはできない。 The psychol ologists. explained the experience itself! 0 Teol ③ But, (even if you could establish the correlation), you would not have con, even if y ontw S' V' O' S V Colorbyeq UNIT 12 徹底精読 AURRE この文は,まだ実現されていないことを仮定している, 仮定法の構文。 eoneigatorongd inanohib しかし,(たとえ,あなたがこの相関関係を証明することができたとしても)、経験自体を説 明したことにはならないだろう。 after all), aware of neurons firing you are aware of the enoo phics arVIOw C Tol A

全文訳お願いします！

4 20 科学 420 words Chapter 1 The recipe for making any creature is written in its DNA. So last year, when 1-1 geneticists* published the near-complete DNA sequence of the long-extinct woolly mammoth, there was much speculation about whether we could bring this giant creature back to life. 5 東京理科大学 Creating a living, breathing creature from a genome* sequence that exists only in a computer's memory is not possible right now. But someone someday is sure to try it, predicts Stephan Schuster, a molecular biologist at Pennsylvania State University and a driving force behind the mammoth genome project. So besides the mammoth, what other extinct beasts might we bring back to life? Well, 12 10 it is only going to be possible with creatures for which we can recover a complete genome Without one, there is no chance. And usually when a creature dies, the (1) - DNA in any flesh left untouched is soon destroyed as it is attacked by sunshine and bacteria. sequence. There are, however, some circumstances in which DNA can be preserved. If your 15 specimen froze to death in an icy wasteland such as Siberia, or died in a dark cave or a really dry region, for instance, then the probability of finding some intact stretches of DNA is much higher. Even in ideal conditions, though, no genetic information is likely to survive more than a million years. - so dinosaurs are out and only much younger remains are likely to yield good-quality DNA. "It's really only worth studying specimens that are less than 100,000 years old," says Schuster. The genomes of several extinct species besides the mammoth are already being sequenced, but turning these into living creatures will not be easy. "It's hard to say that something will never ever be possible," says Svante Pääbo of the Max Planck Institute 25 for Evolutionary Anthropology in Germany, "but it would require technologies so far removed from what we currently have that I cannot imagine how it would be done." But then (3) 50 years ago, who would have believed we would now be able to read the instructions for making humans, fix inherited diseases, clone mammals and be close to creating artificial life? Assuming that we will develop the necessary technology, we have 30 selected ten extinct creatures that might one day be resurrected. Our choice is based not just on practicality, but also on each animal's "charisma" - just how exciting the prospect of resurrecting these animals is. 1-3

どこを抜き出して答えればいいのか分からないので答えをお願いします🙇‍♀️もし出来れば解説もお願いします🙏

次の英文を読み、以下の問いに答えなさい。 Cow. Chicken. Grass. Which two are in the same group? Your answer depends on where you were born and raised. T fedt af gnofed For a long time, *research psychologists have had an idea that East Asians and Westerners think about the world in different ways. There was not enough scientific *evidence to support this idea until recently. In the past 15 years, however, researchers have learned a lot about different thinking styles and the cultural differences that produce them. The story begins in 1972, when *Liang-Hwang Chiu, a professor of *educational psychology at *Indiana University, tested more than 200 Chinese and 300 American children. He showed some cards to each child. Each card had pictures of three things. One card, for example, showed a cow, a chicken, and grass. Chiu asked the children to say which two things were in the same group. Most of the American children picked the chicken and cow. They explained the reason by saying that "both are animals." Most of the Chinese children, however, put the cow and grass together because "cows eat grass." solib - People didn't think Chiu's study was very important in the years after its *publication because $*psychological scientists at that time paid little attention to cultural differences. In the 1990s, however, *cross-cultural psychology became 2"hot" and Chiu's findings were paid attention to again. 3 Researchers at the University of Michigan did Chiu's study again by testing college students from China, Taiwan, and the United States. Without using pictures, the researchers gave the students with and asked them to say which two three words shampoo, hair, and conditioner, for example 20 were in the same group. The Americans were more likely than the Chinese to say that shampoo and conditioner go together because they're both hair care goods. The Chinese were more likely to say that shampoo and hair go together because "shampoo washes and cleans hair." Why do East Asians and Westerners think differently? Most researchers believe the answer can be Taplapo 77 Step A Step B Step C