学年

質問の種類

英語 高校生

仮定法を「現実」で表したとき、couldはcouldn'tになるのに、なせわwouldはwouldn'tじゃなくてdon'tになるのですか?

Focus 150 151 Focus 150 270 1. If I were free, I could go with you. 暇があれば 君と一緒に行けるのに。 2. If I knew his phone number, I would call him. 彼の電話番号を知っていれば、 彼に電話するのに。 現在のことを表す仮定法 (仮定法過去) +Plus> 仮定法過去 「もし(今)~ならば,…だろうに」と現在の事実と違うこと、実際には起こり得ない ことを述べる場合,過去形が使われる。これを仮定法過去と呼ぶ。形は過去である が、現在のことを表す。 仮定法過去の形は次のようになる。 ① 節の動詞には過去形を用いる。 be 動詞の場合,普通は were になる。 ② 主節には助動詞の過去形が使われる。 それぞれ次のような意味になる。 would(…だろうに), could (….. できるのに), might (…かもしれないのに) ► If you tried harder, you might solve the problem. GRAY (もっとがんばれば,その問題が解けるかもしれないのに。) 仮定法過去 「もし(今) ~ならば,…だろうに」 ! 注意> If + S' + 過去形 if 節 would , S + could might + 動詞の原形 BEC 参考> 《英》では主節に should が使われることもある。 文語的表現。 1. 現在形の否定文を使って, 「現実」 を次のように表すことができる。 →Iam not free, so I can't go with you. (暇がないので、君と一緒に行けない。) 主節 2. 「現実」 は次のように表すことができる。 →I don't know his phone number, so I don't call him. ( 彼の電話番号を知らないので,電話しない。) 405 406 仮定法の文で、1人称・3人称単数の場合, 口語では was が用いられることが多い = If I was free, I could go with you. 節は後ろに置くこともできる。 Sally would be pleased if she were here now. (サリーが今ここにいれば喜ぶだろうに。) If Cleopatra's nose had been shorter, the whole face of the world would have be changed. - Blaise Pascal

回答募集中 回答数: 0
英語 高校生

至急!!私立大学看護学部の過去問です。答えがないため、回答を作って欲しいです!!科目は英語です。

問題番号に対応 効とする。 うち受験票お researchers at the University of Veterinary Medicine in Vienna, Austria, have found. Dogs won't give food to a human, even if that person gave them some food first, and that they would help other dogs that had helped them before. Therefore, the team Previous studies have shown that dogs can recognize cooperative and uncooperative humans, "reciprocal altruism"- that is, doing a good thing in return to a human who had given expected to find that their test subjects would put these two things together and show To start, the team trained a group of 37 dogs to press a button which would activate a them food first. *enclosure with the dispenser, while one of (2) two humans was in a separate enclosure with the button. One would press the button to food dispenser. Then, they put each dog in an would not. Each dog was paired with both humans in give food to the dog, and (4) unhelpful one. turn. After that, the researchers switched over the button and the dispenser. They expected that the dogs would press the button to give food to the helpful human but not to the though the dogs did press the button, they did it just as often when either human had the food dispenser, and even when no human was there at all. "In these kinds of studies (5) [perform / to / dogs / which/ trained / are in a particular behavior for an experiment, they will usually do the behavior a few times as they have simply learned the association between the behavior and getting a reward, and it may be enjoyable for them to do the behavior," said Jim McGetrick, a PhD student at the University of Veterinary Medicine in Vienna who led the research. 身を正しく が本冊子 1番 2 次の英文を読んで下の設問に答えなさい。 (3) giving us some food? Are they a combination of reasons. "It is (6) Why wouldn't our best pals want to help us out by secretly all bad boys and girls? McGetrick believes there is possible that the dogs did not understand enough about the task to realize that only one of the humans was providing them with food," he said. It could also be because they didn't fully understand the button and dispenser system, or because they were too focused on the food to notice whether a particular human was pressing the button or not. "Having said all that, even if they did completely understand the task and were fully attentive to the actions of the humans, there is still a good possibility that they wouldn't have given food back in return," he added. "It could be that providing food to a dog as they do not typically do that in everyday life." After all, humans are the ones who human is something very strange for (7) already have food, from a dog's perspective. why would your pet need to worry about (8) making sure you have enough? However, all the humans in the study were people the dogs didn't know. "It is quite 5

回答募集中 回答数: 0